It's Wrong for the Right to be Rudyphobic

National Review Online ^ | October 12, 2007 | Deroy Murdock

[dforest]

Wow. So we were absent the truth. Gives the Roto rooties one less talking point.

I like post# 1790 at that link! A classic.

[wagglebee]

What then is Bush?

A major disappointment.

[wagglebee]

Gives the Roto rooties one less talking point.

You obviously haven't spent enough time observing the left, facts NEVER stand in the way of talking points.

[ARE SOLE]

There’s no way in hell that the cross dressing, gun grabbing abortionist liberal Rudy Giuliani’s ever going to sit behind Ronald Reagan’s desk.

Word.

Regards

[calcowgirl]

There is absolutely nothing liberal about Giuliani’s views on the role of the federal government, taxes, spending, crime, immigration (post 9-11),separation of powers, national defense, the war, islamo-fascism, pornography, and a host of other issues.

Then you obviously haven't looked at his record. Support for illegal immigration, record growth in government, huge debt obligations, gun control, constitutional abuses, etc. I don't care if you call it liberal or just-plain-wrong. I'll never vote for him.

[SirLinksalot]

typical Reagan bashing post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1911425/posts?page=75#75

I protest your characterization that this is Reagan bashing.

Ronald Reagan DID sign a bill in June 14, 1967 liberalizing California abortion laws (that was before Roe vs. Wade).

See here : The Ronald Reagan Archive

Yes, he did live to regret it. But that does not mean he didn't sign it. face the facts and stop calling someone who voted for him twice a basher.

A man is entitled to change his mind, but we cannot change the facts.

[sitetest]

Drop dead, Deroy Murdock.

[Man50D]

What then is Bush? Spends money light it falls out of thin air, but wears his SoCon bonafides on his sleeve.

Liberal or conservative?

He is a flaming socialist.

[bpop]

I agree-but he was better than Gore in 2000 and Kerry in 2004.

So we held our noses and voted for him.

[wagglebee]

Protest away, but trying to say that Reagan was an abortionist to try to make Rooty look better is still a LIE!

[LowCountryJoe]

Two-thirds of the states, NOT two-thirds of the population.

Um, no! Two-thirds of both houses of congress and three-quarters of each of the individual states.

[wagglebee]

You are correct, I was responding to a post and failed to double-check everything.

[LowCountryJoe]

We’ve heard all the RINO talking points before.

So, you're not tone-deaf to your own voices, afterall.

[darkangel82]

IF you were trying to be funny, it failed.

[LowCountryJoe]

It implies one can also be fiscally liberal(aka socialist) at the same time. It is impossible to support those issues that oppose socialism while supporting spending boat loads of taxpayer dollars on issues favored by socialists! Social conservative is another deceptive politically correct term used by socialists to disguise themselves as conservatives. Either you are a conservative or you are a socialist.

Really!? Then how else would you describe someone like Mike Huckabee?

[LowCountryJoe]

IF you were trying to be funny, it failed.

Oh, you heard that, too? Funny thing about RINOs, a list of them get published quite regularly by Human Events and TheClub For Growth. How many position of those two orginazations do you actually endorse/champion?

[William Terrell]

Ah, I see. I'm supposed to put my imprimatur, by deliberately voting for him/her/it, on a candidate whose political philosophy has no point in common with mine to avoid the election of another whose political philosophy have no point in common with mine?

Just to avoid the label "democrat" in favor of the label "republican" and ignore the actuality of liberalism?

[mimaw]

Right and do you really believe we are there yet?

[sitetest]

Dear wagglebee,

Actually, a constitutional amendment requires two thirds of each House of Congress, and then ratification by three quarters of the states.

sitetest

[TigersEye]

No Rudy Toot ever.