Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McGovern: Impeach Bush, Cheney Now
CBS News ^ | 1/6/08 | David Morgan

Posted on 01/06/2008 10:37:13 AM PST by melt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: melt

I think the country already made it known, 25 years ago, what they think of you George.

Now shut up and sit down


21 posted on 01/06/2008 10:50:01 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Didn’t you vote for McGovern in your younger years?

Probably not...I don't think anybody did.

22 posted on 01/06/2008 10:51:28 AM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: melt

The dhimmicrats have demonstrated such a commanding knowledge of the constitution....NOT! We really should be worried about the fact that both the dhimmicrats and the repulsicans both present to us “leaders” who are - by any means of measure - of even lower intellect than journalists.


23 posted on 01/06/2008 10:51:39 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingConspirator
Wasn’t his daughter one of Slick’s distracions...

You’re thinking of Eleanor Mondale.
24 posted on 01/06/2008 10:51:43 AM PST by Cheburashka (Liberals: hapless pigeons being torn apart by FReeper falcons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: melt
They have repeatedly violated the Constitution. They have transgressed national and international law. They have lied to the American people time after time. Their conduct and their barbaric policies have reduced our beloved country to a historic low in the eyes of people around the world. These are truly 'high crimes and misdemeanors,' to use the constitutional standard."

I don't suppose McGovern said exactly what these supposed Constitutional violations were?

25 posted on 01/06/2008 10:52:10 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

Very possible. Titles completely different. The other one is scrolling by now too.


26 posted on 01/06/2008 10:52:18 AM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

I was 15 when McGovern ran.

I did vote for Carter in 1976.

a decision whose fruit borne kickstarted my transformation


27 posted on 01/06/2008 10:52:51 AM PST by wardaddy (Huckabee is dancing on Thompson's card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: melt
Is this an ad for Dr. Kervorkian ? Before or after ?
28 posted on 01/06/2008 10:52:53 AM PST by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
This is the Washington Post editors’ idea of meaningful commentary in an election year! Thoughtful and insightful!

And people used to make fun of Pravda.

29 posted on 01/06/2008 10:53:20 AM PST by SIDENET (Hubba Hubba...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Pauline Kael of the New Yorker once famously said that she found it incredible that Nixon beat McGovern because “nobody I know voted for Nixon.” McGovern actually won Manhattan, one of the few large precincts he won. Even Cook County (Chicago) Illinois voted for Nixon, and they didn’t even vote for Reagan.


30 posted on 01/06/2008 10:54:16 AM PST by Clemenza (Ronald Reagan was a "Free Traitor", Like Me ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

I did, Then I voted for Carter... Ahhh to be young, drunk, and stupid again...


31 posted on 01/06/2008 10:55:57 AM PST by Mikey_1962 (Liberals want equality of outcome not opportunity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: melt

Impeach the ‘Rats and RINOs in Congress.


32 posted on 01/06/2008 10:56:23 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I was 16 when Clinton ran the first time, and would have voted for him back then were I eligible. I sort of came to my senses four years later and voted for Harry Browne.


33 posted on 01/06/2008 10:56:41 AM PST by Clemenza (Ronald Reagan was a "Free Traitor", Like Me ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: melt

GET A LIFE


34 posted on 01/06/2008 10:57:01 AM PST by Schichtel (Scorch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

McGovern reminds me of a song...STILL CRAZY AFTER ALL THESE YEARS.....Irrelevant since 1970 too....


35 posted on 01/06/2008 10:58:19 AM PST by Alright_on_the_LeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

I thought he would have been dead by now,but no-he’s still spitting bile as ever..


36 posted on 01/06/2008 11:00:46 AM PST by Farmer Dean (168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Mr. McGovern, those of us who are old enough remember your anti-American record from way back. Now sit down and shut up.

This article mentions that McGovern was an "anti-war" candidate. Let's not forget whos war this actually was. Many people seem to forget that it was the dems, under Kennedy, who got us into Viet Nam, and it was the dems, under Johnson, who escalated it, ensuring a long and bloody engagement. Only after the republicans got in did the dem establishment get "serious" about getting us out of the war. As usual, the dems got us into the mess, and the it was up to the republicans to extricate us from the dem's mess. All the while, the dems were doing all they could to make it more difficult for the republicans. To the point where the leader of the enemy's military practically thanks the media, and one senator from MA in particular, for helping them to win the war.

Mark

37 posted on 01/06/2008 11:01:10 AM PST by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: goldstategop
Good luck on doing that in an election year.

Their rationale of the left is obvious. The believe that impeachment hearings during the campaigns will generate so much bad publicity for the GOP, the party will lose the election. But the voters would see an impeachment attempt for what it is: a politically-motivated ploy to influence the election.

39 posted on 01/06/2008 11:04:21 AM PST by HAL9000 (Fred Thompson/Mike Huckabee 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: melt
he has "belatedly and painfully concluded that the only honorable course for me is to urge the impeachment" of the president and the vice president.

On what basis, George? Because 'Rats don't like them?

40 posted on 01/06/2008 11:05:38 AM PST by ErnBatavia (...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson