Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Act Repeal Could Make Franz Herzog von Bayern New King Of England And Scotland
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 4-7-2008 | Richard Alleyne and Harry de Quetteville

Posted on 04/06/2008 8:51:47 PM PDT by blam

Act repeal could make Franz Herzog von Bayern new King of England and Scotland

By Richard Alleyne and Harry de Quetteville
Last Updated: 2:48am BST 07/04/2008

Gordon Brown is considering repealing the 1701 Act of Settlement as a way of healing a historic injustice by ending the prohibition against Catholics taking the throne.

The Duke of Bavaria, with his niece Elisabeth, is a descendant of King Charles I

But doing so would have the unforeseen consequence of making a 74-year-old German aristocrat the new King of England and Scotland.

Without the Act, Franz Herzog von Bayern, the current Duke of Bavaria, would be the rightful heir to the British Crown under the Stuart line.

The bachelor, who lives alone in the vast Nymphenberg Palace in Munich, is the blood descendant of the 17th-century King Charles I.

"If it [the Act] goes then the whole Catholic line is reinstated," said Prof Daniel Szechi, a lecturer in early modern history at the University of Manchester.

"Franz becomes the rightful claimant to the throne. We would just exchange one German family for another one."

The Act was introduced as part of the power struggle between Parliament, the Christian churches and the monarchy, then dominated by the House of Stuart.

It prohibits any Roman Catholic from having access to the throne, even through marriage. Once a person marries a "Papist" they shall be "for ever incapable to inherit, possess or enjoy the Crown", it asserts.

The legislation effectively severed the Stuart line of succession, a family who favoured Catholicism, and switched it to their distant relatives the Hanoverians, from which our current Queen descends. James II, the son of King Charles, fled into exile.

The Stuarts stopped making claims to the Crown after the death of Henry Benedict Stuart (known to the Jacobites as Henry IX) in 1807, but there remains bitter feeling among many Catholics at their treatment.

The Royal Stuart Society still holds annual vigils at the bronze statue of Charles I in Trafalgar Square.

The Act of Settlement's reach continues today. Prince Michael of Kent renounced his claim to the throne when he married Marie-Christine von Reibnitz, a Catholic divorcee, in 1978.

Next month Peter Phillips, 30, the eldest grandson of the Queen and 11th in line to the throne, will automatically lose his birthright by marrying Autumn Kelly, a Canadian Catholic.

advertisement The Act has recently come under attack from Church leaders and MPs, in particular Scottish MPs, as an unjustifiable discrimination.

In the face of this new pressure, the Prime Minister indicated he would consider abolishing the legislation as it was "antiquated" and discriminatory.

Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, whose brief includes constitutional affairs, said the Government was ready to consider repealing the Act, although he added that it was an extremely complicated issue.

Dr Eveline Cruikshanks, the author of The Glorious Revolution and a former president of the Royal Stuart Society, said: "They ought to repeal the Act. The language is particularly offensive to Catholics and should go."

Patrick Cracroft-Brennan, the editor of Cracroft's Peerage, said that while theoretically the Duke's claim was good, it could never be actioned because Parliament now effectively chose the monarch.

"It is a very interesting hypothesis and theoretically he is the head of the House of Stuart," he said. "But the Government effectively chooses the monarch now and it is highly unlikely to remove the Windsors from the throne."

As for the Duke of Bavaria himself, he is a reluctant heir.

The graduate in economics, who values his privacy, has always laughed off pretensions to the British crown and prefers to concentrate on his modern art collection.

Baron Marcus Bechtolsheim, the president of the administration of the Duke of Bavaria, said: "The Duke generally does not comment on this issue because he sees it as an entirely British question which does not concern him. And he regards it as a purely hypothetical issue.

"Even if this change in Britain happens, it won't change his attitude. All this interest in his opinion makes him smile because, really, he is very happy and satisfied with being the Duke of Bavaria."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: act; actofsettlement; britain; britishcrown; catholic; england; godsgravesglyphs; king; royal; scotland; titulusregius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: CondorFlight
An independent Scotland will then use its offshore oil to join Opec; and use its oil revenues to buy enough F-15s to keep the Brits at bay.

Scotland is a net loss to the British economy, including oil receipts. Scotland can't secede soon enough IMO.

Scotland is only part of the Union because a Scottish King became King of England as well. Seriously: you want to go, we won't stop you. Secede already! And as a byproduct, England will go back to being Conservative.

21 posted on 04/07/2008 4:57:04 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie

Sheesh, I can’t imagine having to dust all that stuff every week.


22 posted on 04/07/2008 5:01:33 AM PDT by Mrs. P (I am most seriously displeased. - Lady Catherine de Bourg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Is it true that in Scotland the socialists are as common as Sheep turds?


23 posted on 04/07/2008 6:40:51 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blam

Looks like the UK version of the our debate about the Presidential Succession Act. (Let’s see, can Bill Clinton be Hillary’s VP?) IOW’s, FAT CHANCE!


24 posted on 04/07/2008 6:54:03 AM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

That seems like an awfully long title for an article, couldn’t they just say, “Chuckie’s Back!!!”?


25 posted on 04/07/2008 8:03:41 AM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I’ve been wondering when someone might decide to take the British monarchy seriously again and install a king who actually acts like one, fully using his powers as soveregn.


26 posted on 04/07/2008 8:07:09 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I have it on impeachable authority from Mel Brooks that it is good to be King. :)


27 posted on 04/07/2008 8:10:14 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Quite happy with a Queen who acts like one, thanks. As for the monarch’s powers...we went through quite a bit of trouble in the 1640s, if I remember, to establish that sovereignty lies with Parliament.


28 posted on 04/07/2008 8:30:01 AM PDT by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: blam

If a Catholic girl ever catches the eye of William or Harry, this act is going to get repealed, like, yesterday. And they coerce this Duke guy into signing away any claim to the throne, just to dot all their i’s and lowercase j’s.


29 posted on 04/07/2008 9:52:09 AM PDT by BaBaStooey ("Awake, O sleeper, and arise from the dead, and Christ will give you light." Ephesians 5:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam


"Can't we all get along?" -- King

.


30 posted on 04/07/2008 10:03:44 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Up the Stuart!


31 posted on 04/07/2008 10:24:59 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

Give me a f***ing break. Besides which, the Jacobite rebellion was a British rebellion, not just a Scottish one....


32 posted on 04/07/2008 11:10:37 AM PDT by thundrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam

Oops, I thought he was standing next to Fergie in that picture.


33 posted on 04/07/2008 11:55:44 AM PDT by Dr. Zzyzx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks Blam.
The Duke of Bavaria, with his niece Elisabeth, is a descendant of King Charles I.
Wooo, there's something to be proud of. ;'D Must have been an April Fool's joke?

Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are Blam, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

· Google · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


34 posted on 06/11/2008 10:46:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson