Skip to comments.Barack Obama's Sole Article in Harvard Law Review Promotes Abortion
Posted on 08/22/2008 2:46:49 PM PDT by wagglebee
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- How strongly does Barack Obama believe in unlimited abortions? Strongly enough that the only article he wrote for the Harvard Law Review while he was a law school student talked about how fervently believed in legalized abortion. Obama's name wasn't attached to any other legal scholarship during the time.
In an article unearthed by the Politico web site, Obama, as the president of the Harvard Law Review, wrote an unsigned article touting abortion.
The web site says the article comes in at six pages and is contained in the third volume of the 1990 Harvard Law Review.
In the work, Obama considered a parenthetical abortion issue -- whether unborn children have a legal right to sue their mothers for damage sustained during pregnancy, from such things as alcohol or illegal drugs.
Obama says no and writes supportively of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court case and another from the Illinois Supreme Court saying no such right exists.
According to Politico, Obama wrote: "[T]he case raises the broader policy and constitutional considerations that argue against using civil liability to control the behavior of pregnant women."
In a discussion of abortion itself, Obama wrote that government has more important business than "ensuring that any particular fetus is born."
He also decried any limits on abortion, saying the government has an interest in "preventing increasing numbers of children from being born in to lives of pain and despair."
Politico said the Obama campaign confirmed the pro-abortion presidential candidate wrote the piece in question and that it was one of the typical articles law students would write briefing and opining on federal and state court decisions.
In an email to the web site, Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt also confirmed that Obama "remains committed to" the sentiments he expressed in the piece.
Obama's article is on page 823 of Volume 103 of the Harvard Law Review and would likely be located in larger public libraries and databases that chronicle legal articles in scholarly publications.
He is truly satanic.
Don’t have the time to waste on this empty suit. Did the opinion contain words containing more than two syllables? (besides abortion, that is....)
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
Good find. I’m sending it to my liberal “friend” who ran off and stuck me with a $65 lunch bill when I told him that Barak wrote no papers at Harvard or while teaching at the University of Chicago law school for three years. My “friend” is an extremely devout Catholic.
Proving once again that Obama supporters are idiots, and dishonest to boot.
Being unfamiliar with the how the Harvard Law Review works, is it normal protocol for writers NOT to sign off on their work ?
Since he didn't sign off on it, can't he simply deny the work ?
“In a discussion of abortion itself, Obama wrote that government has more important business than “ensuring that any particular fetus is born.”
“He is truly satanic.”
Truly satanic indeed! How could someone make such a cold and heartless statement? Abortion is America’s Holocaust and we should have a memorial for the 50 million+ precious and innocent children that have been slaughtered.
Give "TheOne" a break, he simply was learning the language of being nuanced, the favorite word of any elitist liberal < / s >
I cannot imagine a scenario where any truly devout Christian (Catholic or Protestant) could vote for the most pro-abortion politician in America.
I think the system has changed since then, but at the time, the Law Review published "articles" by law professors, which were signed, and "notes" by law students, which were anonymous.
What issue #? Just great! Sigh.
(I'm trying to find it in our university's database)
His obsession with abortion makes me think he got some woman out there pregnant and she refused to get rid of it! I heard part of his “punishment” speech and I swear he said it was punishment on the boy too. He said it like it was an afterthought. It made me GASP!
As a typical leftist anything he wrote would almost certainly concern either abortion, the environment, homosexual “rights” or race. Or he might write something on “social justice” and hit all four as these subjects would constitute the bulk of any such essay with any left over blather being devoted to income redistribution. There isn’t much else that lefties are concerned with. Also note that the left’s preoccupation with disarming the nation has as its ultimate goal the redistribution of the monies “saved” into projects promoting abortion, the environment, homosexual “rights” and racial reparations in one form or another. That the U.S. might find itself under attack and retreating across the world is just an added bonus.
How could he have been the President of the Harvard Law Review and not have published at least one major work?
That’s why I’m voting against Obambi by voting for McCain.
Obambi must be stopped.
“How could he have been the President of the Harvard Law Review and not have published at least one major work?”
The position was determined through a vote by the members of the class.
So with all the white liberal guilt going around at the Harvard Law School of course they vote for the black guy.
“...As a typical leftist anything he wrote would almost certainly concern either abortion, the environment, homosexual rights or race...”
Those are the primary issues the democrats have been running on for decades. Add the ‘stop the war’ crowd now.
Strange that there are no ‘peace’ protesters demanding Russia get out of Georgia.
Sadly, many people around the world would never dare protest Russia. Only the USA can be the evil. Just pathetic!
If he believes so strongly in abortion, why doesn’t he just abort himself?
Maybe deep down he wishes he had been aborted. He is one messed up dude!
Obama can throw anything under the bus including his own work.
What by killing them????
Oftentimes the handicapped have moments of pain and despair. The mentally ill live lives of pain and despair. The poor sometimes live lives of pain and despair. Should we kill all of them?
This is the most evil, self-serving argument for murder I have ever heard.
Indeed. Anyone this obsessed with abortion has to have a very evil mind.
The full title is:
Tort Law -- Prenatal Injuries -- Supreme Court of Illinois Refuses to Recognize Cause of Action Brought by Fetus Against Its Mother for Unintentional Infliction of Prenatal Injuries. -- Stallman v. Younquist 125 Ill. 2d 267, 531 N.E. 2d 355 (1988)I've printed it out and when I return home I'll scan it and post it if it hasn't been posted already.
What a ghoul. His soul is in peril.
What a ghoul. His soul is in peril.
Any soul he might have is an embodiment of evil.
Let’s see...he formed an opinion on this subject - when - while in law school. Ok...but at the Saddleback Q & A session he said that deciding when life begins was/is “not in his pay-grade.” So what pay-grade was he in while at Harvard law school? What a blithering bafoon this Barack character is.
Without the benefit of a clear constitutional pronouncement on these issues, the Stallman court rightly concluded that, at least in cases arising out of maternal negligence, women's interests in autonomy and privacy outweigh the dubious policy benefits of fetal-maternal tort suits. However, the more difficult cases -- those involving maternal activities that might be considered intentional or reckless infliction of prenatal injuries on the fetus -- remain to be decided. As these cases arise, states should avoid adopting constitutionally dubious laws in pursuit of ill-conceived strategies to promote fetal health. Expanded access to prenatal education and health care facilities will far more likely serve the very real state interest in preventing increasing numbers of children from being born into lives of pain and despair.
I assume this is an euphemism for 'Planned Parenthood' just as "economic justice" is an euphemism for 'income redistribution.
The last sentence before the closing sentence states:
On the other hand, the state may also have a more compelling interest in ensuring that fetuses carried to term do not suffer from debilitating injuries than it does in ensuring that any particular fetus is born.
A single stinking article and he becomes president of law review?? More evidence of what an empty, over-stated, piece of sniveling liberal, clap-trap, this homophilic nobody really is.
Thanks for the ping.
I agree with you but there will be plenty. It’s just like Eve listening to the snake in the Garden of Eden.
Of all my reading on the pro-abort movement I can think of no young men involved in abortion rights. Not that Ive focused on that area much.
Barack seems to be in love with abortion. Perhaps like Gloria Steinem and Patricia Ireland. As Rush might say, Barry is a feminazi.
A man who will protect ‘abortion-by-neglect’ method for killing the little ones even outside the womb may not be in love with the evil but he’s certainly a major enabler and intends to continue being such.
No, he's a sitzpinkler.
Makes me wonder (by analogy to Bill Clinton's "feminist" values, contrasted to Paula Jones, Juanita Brodderick, etc.) if Obama might have any misogynist skeletons in his closet...?
No proof, not even an accusation. Just a passing thought.
Is it black liberation theology that paints the black woman as a queen?
One article. LOL!
The Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal indicted and convicted ten Nazi leaders for “encouraging and compelling abortions,” an act which the Tribunal characterized as “a crime against humanity.” As with their other crimes against humanity, the Nazis protested that “we were just following orders.” Lieutenant General Richard Hildebrandt, the SS (Schutzstaffel) Chief of the RKFVD’s Race and Settlement Office in Berlin, stated that “Up to now nobody had the idea to see in this interruption of pregnancy a crime against humanity.”
- Nuremberg Military Tribunals, IV:1081-84. Nuremberg: NO-3512.
Untermensch, sub-human, or under-men was the dehumanizing label assigned to people regarded by the Nazis as so inferior that they were not human beings at all. It is worth noting that Nietzsche’s Overman, or super-human was to overcome the traditional ethicist and create a new morality, by the triumph of will over conscience. Thus spake Zarathustra
Nietzsche Nazis at their finest: “During the height of the killing season at Auchwitz living children were tossed directly into the fires of crematorium furnaces or flaming pits. Their screams could be heard throughout the camp compound....” The Abortion Holocaust
Harvard Law Review pg. 823Make of it what you will. Legal minds - your input would be appreciated.
Harvard Law Review pg. 824
Harvard Law Review pg. 825
Harvard Law Review pg. 826
Harvard Law Review pg. 827
Harvard Law Review pg. 827
It's sad that this is the only document available to us that Bambi has written.
It's a shame that a man who wants to be the president of this great nations feels he must hide his own words from those who would be his people. But there it is.
I'm turning in to bed now. Good night.