Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heresies and Other Truths (Kathleen Parker attacks GOP evangelicals)
Townhall.com ^ | November 19, 2008 | Kathleen Parker

Posted on 11/19/2008 7:45:33 AM PST by EveningStar

As Republicans sort out the reasons for their defeat, they likely will overlook or dismiss the gorilla in the pulpit.

Three little letters, great big problem: G-O-D.

I'm bathing in holy water as I type.

To be more specific, the evangelical, right-wing, oogedy-boogedy branch of the GOP is what ails the erstwhile conservative party and will continue to afflict and marginalize its constituents if reckoning doesn't soon cometh.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: kathleenparker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-215 next last
To: WildcatClan
I do not, personally, like to categorize Conservatives. You either are or you aren’t.

I agree 100%. But we know that there are far too many who love to categorize within the Right. They seem to live for it.


121 posted on 11/19/2008 11:45:22 AM PST by rdb3 (Get out the putter. This one's on the green.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers

>>>>>HAHAHAHAHA!!!! Wrong. Arnie IS the exact copy of what the RINO’s think a Republican should be.<<<<<

You addressed a question to me about “Arnie”.

I presume you mean Schwarzanegger (sp?), about whom I know nothing and could not possibly care any less. Not even a minor blip on my radar screen.

That’s why I said “irrelevant”.


122 posted on 11/19/2008 11:47:37 AM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
>>>>>Sorry, not a member of your club.<<<<<

No, sorry, I'm not an atheist so I'm a little unsure what you've been talking about.

Is that the best you can do?

123 posted on 11/19/2008 11:49:27 AM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn

>>>>>>Why don’t you start that party?<<<<<<

We used to have that party and it was called “the GOP.”


124 posted on 11/19/2008 11:50:25 AM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Atheists are inherently dishonest.


125 posted on 11/19/2008 11:51:58 AM PST by Mojave (http://www.americanbacklash.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers

>>>>>Without a moral foundation, fiscal conservatives WILL lose their way. Count on it.<<<<<<<

By the way, do you think that “a moral foundation” comes only, exclusively, and specifically from Protestant Christianity?

It’s important that you spell that out.


126 posted on 11/19/2008 11:54:10 AM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

>>>>Atheists are inherently dishonest.<<<<<

Yes, yes, of course.

You already said that in post #100.

Cute.


127 posted on 11/19/2008 11:55:26 AM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

>>>>Without a belief in God, and Heaven and Hell, there is no reason whatsoever to be “conservative” or anything else virtuous. <<<<<<<

I could not care less about your personal religious beliefs or your religious morals.

My concern is about enshrining Protestant Christian sectarian beliefs in U.S. law, or even leaving that impression. That’s bordering on theocracy and it’s what the Taliban do.

Most importantly the Religionist impulse presents conservatism and the GOP as offshoots of Protestant Christianity. Every time I have this discussion those are exactly the arguments I hear, the same as yours.

We have done just fine as a nation with the Declaration, the Constitution, and other words from our Founders. Yes, they may have been divinely inspired, that’s quite another discussion.

But note well that those works are entirely about secular governance mixed with a profound revulsion of aristocracy and theocracy.


128 posted on 11/19/2008 12:11:23 PM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Why? Because you know what is best and others don’t?

Biblical Christianity is the only guide.

If it is in the Bible, that is good enough guide for me. Is it good enough guide for you? Anything else is man made.


129 posted on 11/19/2008 12:27:08 PM PST by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers

>>>>Biblical Christianity is the only guide.<<<<<<

Biblical Christianity is the only guide to American government?

That’s an interesting concept.

And it is stupifyingly wrong about the Founders and American history, not to mention the entirety of Western civilization.

I’m surprised you’d say something so ridiculous in a public forum. But I suppose you’re proud about it.


130 posted on 11/19/2008 12:34:11 PM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Yak, yak, yak. I don't know what Ms. Parker, Ms. Noonan, et. al. are complaining about.

RINOs have had defacto control over the Republican party for the last few election cycles. All this public sniping indicates RINOs really don't want to do the hard work of developing some sort of consensus with religious conservatives - or, for that matter, fiscal conservatives like myself. I guess the “Big Tent” doesn't include us unless we abandon our core principles - which personally I have no interest in doing - so why even talk about us at all?

I suggest she and her cohorts’ time would be better spent getting off their collective butts and getting that new base.

Will be interesting to see what groups, if any, they pry away from the Democrats. Time to get out the popcorn.

131 posted on 11/19/2008 12:34:52 PM PST by Strzelec (Soon, folks are going to find out who this John Galt guy really is...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angkor

If you don’t understand that this country was founded on Biblical Christian principles, that just neatly explains the problem.

It is you who have made a fool of yourself on a public form. The Left has successfully indoctrinated you into the school of never knowing the foundation of real freedom.

There are plenty more of you out there. This nation will be enslaved because people like you will reject reality.


132 posted on 11/19/2008 12:41:11 PM PST by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Mrs Parker: What percentage of folks in US believe in God? What percentage go to church?


133 posted on 11/19/2008 12:54:02 PM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers

>>>>If you don’t understand that this country was founded on Biblical Christian principles, that just neatly explains the problem.<<<<<<

This is such a stupid assertion that you have to be trolling.


134 posted on 11/19/2008 1:08:41 PM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Typical name calling.

No wonder that the Republican party is losing.


135 posted on 11/19/2008 1:20:39 PM PST by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers

I said the assertion was stupid.

That’s not “name calling”.


136 posted on 11/19/2008 1:27:04 PM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Kathleen Parker is best ignored. She never has had much interesting to say, but now that she is in “martyr mode”, she has even less.

Why do you even bother reading her, much less posting her?


137 posted on 11/19/2008 1:45:57 PM PST by gridlock (Bill Clinton will be offered the job as Obama's Secretary of State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottinoc

I’ve been reading Ms. Parker for a few years now and have long detected a fondness for government bureaucracy and a very subtle dislike for the grassroots of the Republican party.

However, in the last couple of months she’s really shred her mask and revealed herself to be an anti-Christian bigot and an open hater of your everyday sort of person.

Her articles are full of mockery, but there is no real intellectual nuance, so she should refrain from her self-adulation.


138 posted on 11/19/2008 2:26:30 PM PST by ShiveringShegetz (Yes, I'm Shivering!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: angkor
>>>>If you don’t understand that this country was founded on Biblical Christian principles, that just neatly explains the problem.<<<<<<

This is such a stupid assertion that you have to be trolling.

And so just what does this mean...

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,..."

Biblical Christianity. Sigh. But you know what the Declaration of Independence says. It just isn't important to you.

139 posted on 11/19/2008 2:39:34 PM PST by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: angkor

“We used to have that party and it was called “the GOP.””

That isn’t an answer to what I asked. It’s not even true, but it’s still not an answer.

I think you wouldn’t start that party because it would fail. You want to call it the fiscal conservative party, but it would really be the secular humanist conservative party.

You’re not ranting about conservative Evangelicals ‘fiscal’ beliefs you’re ranting against their religious beliefs. Maybe they don’t like your political atheism? Maybe ‘you’ should have to get out of the tent? And KP?


140 posted on 11/19/2008 2:51:46 PM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism, it's the new black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson