Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beware Birth Certificate Hopefuls - You are in for quite a suprise (vanity)

Posted on 12/03/2008 8:14:35 AM PST by Scythian

This birth certificate issue has been going on for some time now and for those hoping for some kind of dramatic outcome you are in for another big disappointment.

First, there is always the chance that there is a valid birth certificate proving Obama to be a US citizen.

Second, enough time has passed such that the Obama cult has manufactured and installed a phony certificate that will re-route us back up to option 1 above, he will have a valid certificate. Who do you think works in these kinds of government offices? They're all democrats.

Third, no court is going to force Obama to prove himself to be a citizen, the burden is on those making the accusation that he is not a citizen. A criminal doesn't have to prove he didn't commit a crime, the state has to prove that he did.

=================================

Flame on, and sorry for the Vanity, but this is driving me nutz, this issue gets my hopes up but then common sense dashes my hope on the rocks, and this now is a daily occurrence. You are going to find a valid certificate at the end of this road if you are lucky enough to get a judge to demand it, and that is very unlikely, whether the certificate be real or phony it won't matter, and will never be able to proven either way.


TOPICS: US: Hawaii; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; constitution; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; whathospital
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 441-447 next last
To: MHGinTN; Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; Polarik; ...

Thanks, MHGinTn. Good comment. Our lives are determined by the choices we make.

Ping.


321 posted on 12/03/2008 12:20:54 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

When did Obama try to have the definition of ‘natural born’ expanded?
***When the resolution before the Senate in 2000 for McCain came up. He introduced additional language that was rejected.


322 posted on 12/03/2008 12:21:07 PM PST by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: Designer

I doubt the word ‘bastard’ is there, but it may say “Father: UNKNOWN”

I think there’s something fishy about the whole thing, but it may not have anything to do with his eligibility for POTUS.


323 posted on 12/03/2008 12:22:23 PM PST by rswan6574
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Excellent. Bookmark that section on Obama using his Kenyan Citizenship for his own benefit.

Under that scenario, much of the narrative fits as well as his own actions.


324 posted on 12/03/2008 12:24:37 PM PST by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thanks lucy for the pings!


325 posted on 12/03/2008 12:25:06 PM PST by atlbelle44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Well you missed with that one. Try again.

I'm not going to bother, since you haven't actually refuted my points. Hand-waving doesn't count.

326 posted on 12/03/2008 12:25:20 PM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

Comment #327 Removed by Moderator

To: rswan6574
The point is that Obama has the burden to show his eligibilty thus allowing others to make the determination rather than him declaring himself eligible via his hiding of all his records.

Now, Democrats, being a criminal enterprise, have no problem with that and many obamanoid operatives are working FR trying to float that position, even resorting to accusing us of being fools to continue on with this issue of constitutional eligibility. But that is just David Axelrod agitprops working his astroturfing campaign for the little affrimative action Chicago squirrel.

There are also obamanoid operatives mining for points to be solved in presenting their fraudulent candidate as eligible ... the bastards want to know everything that can possibly come up or out that will resonate witht eh public so they can formulate astroturfing ways to negate them.

328 posted on 12/03/2008 12:29:51 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: texas12joe

MOST posts I read on FR blieved the API tape did not exist, at least after a VERY short time (such as days), I thought it hokey after the API machinations.


329 posted on 12/03/2008 12:30:54 PM PST by PghBaldy (I shall call him President Little Squirt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

Um, could be that I’m inferring you get on your knees to worship the little Marxist squirrel ... but we see where your mind is, junior.


330 posted on 12/03/2008 12:30:55 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: rswan6574

The Constitution actually says

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;”

The phrase “or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution” specifically covers Alexander Hamilton since the argument could have been made for the others that since they were born in what became the United States, they were naturally born there. Hamilton would not have had that argument.


331 posted on 12/03/2008 12:33:08 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
BTW, agitprop, the following is wrong based upon the law as it read in 1961 requiring that his mother have been a resident for FIVE years after her fourteenth birthday in order to be capable of passing citizenship to him ... she was eighteen when he was born, wherever:

"Realize that if he was born to a parent who is a Natural Born citizen then he himself is a Natural Born citizen."

332 posted on 12/03/2008 12:33:17 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scythian
Third, no court is going to force Obama to prove himself to be a citizen, the burden is on those making the accusation that he is not a citizen. A criminal doesn't have to prove he didn't commit a crime, the state has to prove that he did.

Wrong. The burden is on Barack Obama to prove that he's constitutionally qualified to serve as President. This is not a criminal case. This is the base requirement to be President.

If he fails to prove it, the burden then falls on every elected official, every Elector, every judge, to keep their sworn oath and keep him out of office. He can't be President if he's not a natural born citizen.

333 posted on 12/03/2008 12:35:26 PM PST by EternalVigilance (AIPNEWS.com - America's Independent Party: "Peace through superior firepower!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helen
True, backed by solid legal argument, precedence, and language found in the Constitution.

Donofrio's argument would ask that the court relegate millions of native-born Americans to the status 2nd-class citizens. This is not, anywhere backed by solid legal argument, precedence, and language found in the Constitution. We tried the "2nd-class citizen" idea before and it didn't work out so well. I doubt the Supreme Court will try so again.

334 posted on 12/03/2008 12:35:27 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO

It wasn’t MEANT to be funny.

It was meant to make those who see it THINK and BECOME VERY ANGRY at the trashing of it by “our” alleged “leaders.”

Good!! Sounds like it worked!

Dick Bachert (USAF ‘62-’66)

http://www.virtualwall.org/ds/ShimpAH01a.htm


335 posted on 12/03/2008 12:36:02 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: ColdDecember

It wasn’t MEANT to be funny.

It was meant to make those who see it THINK and BECOME VERY ANGRY at the trashing of it by “our” alleged “leaders.”

Good!! Sounds like it worked!

Dick Bachert (USAF ‘62-’66)

http://www.virtualwall.org/ds/ShimpAH01a.htm


336 posted on 12/03/2008 12:36:41 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: melancholy

Go ask Bush Cheney.

My vote made them get in twice and look what they did?

I repeat, we already became socialist. All is left is official.


337 posted on 12/03/2008 12:37:03 PM PST by texas12joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Anitius Severinus Boethius
BTW, agitprop, the following is wrong based upon the law as it read in 1961 requiring that his mother have been a resident for FIVE years after her fourteenth birthday in order to be capable of passing citizenship to him ... she was eighteen when he was born, wherever:

Just to be clear, you both know that the only way this might be applicable is if he was born abroad? This law does not apply to someone born in the US.

338 posted on 12/03/2008 12:37:09 PM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Right, kneepads as a term of worshiping. That's what all those jokes about Monica Lewinsky “earning her Presidential kneepads” were all about, right.

You are presented facts but rather than construct points that support your assertion to refute those facts, you suggest that people perform sexual acts upon Barack Obama.

Well “old man”, your ability to hold civil discourse, to disseminate information, and to debate in a clear and factual way are lacking in the worst ways possible.

Knock off the ad-hominums and present facts, or sit silently and let your ignorance take a break.

339 posted on 12/03/2008 12:37:13 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

“At the time of Obama’s birth his mother was not four full years past her fourteenth birthdate so she was not able to pass citizenship to him.”

It is my understanding the above does not apply to an unmarried minor. Consider the case of an unmarried 16 year old American who might unexpectably give birth while on a short trip overseas. Is her child not an American? I believe that child is born an American. I understand that was the law even when 0bama was born. If his mother had been legally married, that would be different. Then the father’s citizenship is important.

Perhaps, I heard wrong, but believe me, I’m not trying to find an excuse to confer citizenship on 0bama. I did not vote for him. I do not want him to be President. There is no dissonance factor at work here. I’m just objectively considering all possiblities.


340 posted on 12/03/2008 12:37:53 PM PST by rgboomers (This space purposely left blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 441-447 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson