Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beware Birth Certificate Hopefuls - You are in for quite a suprise (vanity)

Posted on 12/03/2008 8:14:35 AM PST by Scythian

This birth certificate issue has been going on for some time now and for those hoping for some kind of dramatic outcome you are in for another big disappointment.

First, there is always the chance that there is a valid birth certificate proving Obama to be a US citizen.

Second, enough time has passed such that the Obama cult has manufactured and installed a phony certificate that will re-route us back up to option 1 above, he will have a valid certificate. Who do you think works in these kinds of government offices? They're all democrats.

Third, no court is going to force Obama to prove himself to be a citizen, the burden is on those making the accusation that he is not a citizen. A criminal doesn't have to prove he didn't commit a crime, the state has to prove that he did.

=================================

Flame on, and sorry for the Vanity, but this is driving me nutz, this issue gets my hopes up but then common sense dashes my hope on the rocks, and this now is a daily occurrence. You are going to find a valid certificate at the end of this road if you are lucky enough to get a judge to demand it, and that is very unlikely, whether the certificate be real or phony it won't matter, and will never be able to proven either way.


TOPICS: US: Hawaii; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; constitution; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; whathospital
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-447 next last
To: RegulatorCountry

Ex Post Facto refers to criminal law, not simple legal definitions or standards. The Ex Post Facto ruling on Canal Zone citizenship is what gave McCain ‘natural born citizenship’ status re 8 U.S.C. §1403 which retroactively recognized canal zone citizenship. (the bill, passed in 1952 was made retroactive to Feb, 1904)


41 posted on 12/03/2008 8:28:00 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hsrazorback1

Amen!!


42 posted on 12/03/2008 8:28:45 AM PST by waxer1 ( Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Scythian; All

Does anyone still have the link to the Hawaii birth certificate from c. 1961 (not Barack’s) that shows what kind of information was included? I saw one several weeks ago on FR.


43 posted on 12/03/2008 8:29:42 AM PST by Genoa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

we have already proven he is nt a citizen, with his own statements, his own autobiography, and his own grandmothers statements


44 posted on 12/03/2008 8:30:50 AM PST by RaceBannon (We have sown the wind, but we will reap the whirlwind. NObama. Not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

“Ex Post Facto”

Well, I think that only prohibits criminalizing behavior that wasn’t criminal at the time, so I don’t think it would apply.


45 posted on 12/03/2008 8:31:49 AM PST by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
I see no new facts here just your opinion so I'll add my own opinion.

The fact that the MSM is now starting to cover this is very interesting. I thought this subject was not worthy before the election, there were other more important issues. Now that he's won let's see if it's a legitimate victory. Even if we lose this battle his administration will be tainted by scandal before it even begins.

It would be so easy for Obama to end this by just waving it at a press conference. The fact that he had many opportunities and hasn't makes me think there really is something rotten in Denmark.

46 posted on 12/03/2008 8:32:03 AM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas

I would agree with that. I would also say that they never envisioned a free press that would so loathe this nation that it would sell it’s own soul to make sure an unqualified man like this would be elected.


47 posted on 12/03/2008 8:32:05 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Okay lefties... the problem with wanting something, is that you sometimes get it. Good luck now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
Photobucket
48 posted on 12/03/2008 8:32:09 AM PST by IrishPennant (He that is good for making excuses is seldom good for anything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Im on the same page like you.

I still have “nightmares” as to how we were duped by that API-Michelle tape.

At the end of this whole drive, we might just be set up as MOONBATS.

The more I step back and review all these issues, the more I see the risks ahead.

For me, its all down to SCOTUS on Friday. If SCOTUS punts and dismisses the cases, thats a huge sign that this was all for nothing.


49 posted on 12/03/2008 8:32:14 AM PST by texas12joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinodino

our constyitution states the followng:

YOU ARE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.

its not the RATS/Obama to prove their “citizenship qualifications”.

its for us/you to prove “they are not”.

Scythan, I agree 100% with you.


50 posted on 12/03/2008 8:32:14 AM PST by texas12joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LongIslandConservative

Because 0bama’s father was legally married to someone other than 0bama’s mother previously and never divorced, 0bama’s mother was actually an unwed mother at the time of 0bama’s birth. Single American mother’s can give birth anywhere in the world at anytime and the child is a natural born citizen. Therefore, 0bama is a natural born citizen of the USA.

So, why is 0bama afraid to show his birth certificate? Darn good question. There must be something there mighty embarrassing.


51 posted on 12/03/2008 8:32:29 AM PST by rgboomers (This space purposely left blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

Yes why indeed make all this fuss over nothing? Aren’t the people of the US entitled to know who this man is?

Obviously he is hiding something and if he isn’t then he sure is a wasteful SOB and in such troubling economic times... Imagine all the homeless that could have gotten a meal on the millions he paid lawyers to represent him regarding this simple issue.

OK so now common sense takes over and we see that he is hiding something. Something that proves he is a FRAUD.

America has the right to know.


52 posted on 12/03/2008 8:32:59 AM PST by tomnbeverly (Doing time on the Obama Plantation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

He’s hiding something. The American people deserve to know what it is.

I agree he will be inaugurated.


53 posted on 12/03/2008 8:33:02 AM PST by freespirited (Honk to indict the MSM for treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
First: So what? He's already engaged in a felony by manufacturing and portraying as genuine a fake COLB.

Second: And there could be aliens alive in the U.S. right now.

Third: A court already threw a presidential candidate off the ticket because he didn't meet the Constitutional requirements. It was appealed all the way to the Supreme Court where he lost also.
54 posted on 12/03/2008 8:33:46 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishPennant

Thanks, I meant a vault certificate. The modern COLB is abbreviated.


55 posted on 12/03/2008 8:33:58 AM PST by Genoa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

“Oba Mao”

Best version of his name yet. I like it. I rank it up there with “Gorebbel’s Warming.”


56 posted on 12/03/2008 8:34:16 AM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
I agree with you fully on point one. But not on point three:

no court is going to force Obama to prove himself to be a citizen, the burden is on those making the accusation that he is not a citizen.

By law in the State of New Jersey the SOS is required to certify that candidates for public office are "qualified", to do this she would need proof that he is a citizen. She did not do that regarding Obama, this is the essence of the Donofrio case.

57 posted on 12/03/2008 8:34:20 AM PST by Michael.SF. ("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stimulant

http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj15n2-3-4.html
They can be civil or criminal. I believe the response to such an `end run’ attempt would be to require Madame Lugosi to get her minions to amend the Constitution.


58 posted on 12/03/2008 8:34:58 AM PST by tumblindice (I will not eat them, Obama I am, I will not eat green eggs & ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Even if Obama was found to be born in Kenya to an American Mother, I would bet that Pelosi would call a special session and pass an emergency bill to change the four year residency requirement for one parent, retroactively, thus, recognizing Obama’s citizenship by way of his mother.

This would require an amendment to the Constitution because they can't write an ex post facto law, particularly to benefit a particular individual.
59 posted on 12/03/2008 8:35:04 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
The Ex Post Facto ruling on Canal Zone citizenship is what gave McCain ‘natural born citizenship’ status re 8 U.S.C. §1403 which retroactively recognized canal zone citizenship. (the bill, passed in 1952 was made retroactive to Feb, 1904)

Have you even looked at one of the many images, of John McCain's birth certificate, floating around the web? It clearly states, on every single version I've ever seen, that he was born in Colon, Panama, which has never been in the Canal Zone.

Even if he had been born in the Canal Zone, there is no law that can be passed that supercedes the Constitution on the matter.

You would have us believe that John McCain suddenly became a natural born citizen at age 16. But, he either was at birth, or he was not, and is not. The Constitution forbids changing that after the fact.

60 posted on 12/03/2008 8:35:10 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-447 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson