Skip to comments.
Sarah for Senate? [Palin leading Murkowski by 24 points, 55 to 31 percent.....]
The Politico ^
Posted on 12/22/2008 9:10:35 AM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Hmmm, explains Murkowski’s attempted preemptive strike a few weeks back.
2
posted on
12/22/2008 9:12:01 AM PST
by
Badeye
(There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
To: Sub-Driver
I’d be in favor of her in the Senate. Too few conservatives there.
3
posted on
12/22/2008 9:12:42 AM PST
by
tips up
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: Sub-Driver
Her decision, obviously, but I prefer she stay away from the Senate. She is a good executive who does not need to muddy herself with the do-nothings in Congress.
To: Sub-Driver
She should remain a governor, where she will get more actual executive experience.
Senators are a dime a dozen.
6
posted on
12/22/2008 9:15:58 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the opium of the people.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"Senators are a dime a dozen. And here I thought they were a million dollars a piece...
7
posted on
12/22/2008 9:18:19 AM PST
by
drc43
(Finally , we fooled enough of you... now we can screw you totally!!!....Nancy Pelosi)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Senators are a dime a dozen.Nah. Those guys are a million bucks each.
8
posted on
12/22/2008 9:19:56 AM PST
by
agere_contra
(So ... where's the birth certificate?)
To: drc43
9
posted on
12/22/2008 9:20:22 AM PST
by
agere_contra
(So ... where's the birth certificate?)
To: drc43
And here I thought they were a million dollars a piece... That's only in Crook County.
10
posted on
12/22/2008 9:20:28 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the opium of the people.)
To: tips up
The Senate’s a dead-end for a young Conservative like Governor Palin.
11
posted on
12/22/2008 9:21:04 AM PST
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
To: Sub-Driver
I don’t think she should soil herself by being in the Senate, unless she has no plans to run for President.
12
posted on
12/22/2008 9:21:07 AM PST
by
wny
To: Abbeville Conservative
"Sarah can do more for Alaska and her political future by remaining governor. "
I agree. With the current Congress there is nothing she can do that would help her politically. The dems are going to prevail in almost every instance, and she will only open herself up to more (fabricated) criticism by moving to Washington.
Besides, the budgets are down in Alaska, so she does not need to be seen as "deserting the ship"...she needs to fix Alaska first.
Unfortunately, congress is becoming a large ACORN, and needs a through cleaning out. And, by the time the current congress gets finished toe-tapping with obama for the next 4 years, their popularity numbers will be measured using fractions...probably in the negative range.
So Sarah...stay in Alaska and keep them wondering....
13
posted on
12/22/2008 9:21:08 AM PST
by
FrankR
(“Turtle up”, economically, for the duration of the 0bamanation.)
To: drc43
True, poor Sarah would’ve stood to make more money if Stevens had lost and she could appoint someone else. I mean you don’t give a Senate seat away for bleeping nothing you know.
14
posted on
12/22/2008 9:21:30 AM PST
by
redk
To: Sub-Driver
"The poll, commissioned by the Daily Kos..." LOL!!! They still fear her!
15
posted on
12/22/2008 9:25:31 AM PST
by
avacado
To: Abbeville Conservative
16
posted on
12/22/2008 9:25:49 AM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: Michael Barnes
I prefer she stay away from the Senate.Me too. Not that she would necessarily be corrupted by the environment in Washington but people there lose all understanding of "common" Americans. Our future national leadership must come from outside the beltway.
17
posted on
12/22/2008 9:32:10 AM PST
by
JimSEA
To: Michael Barnes
Complete agreement.
18
posted on
12/22/2008 9:33:34 AM PST
by
wally_bert
(Tactical Is Still Missing A Chair! Star Wreck In The Pirkinning......)
To: Sub-Driver
FReepers, this is desperate spin - the last thing Palin needs is to be in the Senate. The lib media WANTS her to go to the Senate because it would keep her out of the presidential race in 2012. I mean, think about it. She goes to the Senate in 2010, then runs for President in 2012 and the lib media will crucify her for only being in the Senate for less than two years.
Palin needs to flatly deny any talk about her going to the House of Lords and state that's she committed to being Governor. And that's where should stay - as Governor, not keeping a chair warm in the Senate.
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Does she want to go through the media anal exam again? Put her family through that? The media would go after 10x harder if she was running for President.
OTOH, she has been vetted this past fall. Anything they bring up will be old news.
I continue to be surprised by how many “lifelong Republicans” say they didn’t like her and that she cost McCain the election. I don’t doubt their Republican affiliation and know that many contribute generously to the Republican Party. I respectfully disagree with them but am dismayed at the opinions of many who I consider mainstream Republicans.
20
posted on
12/22/2008 9:36:30 AM PST
by
tips up
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson