Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Pretty sad' Limbaugh's the lead GOP voice: Ron Paul
The Hill ^

Posted on 03/02/2009 12:03:53 PM PST by Sub-Driver

'Pretty sad' Limbaugh's the lead GOP voice: Ron Paul @ 2:13 pm by Michael O'Brien

It is pretty sad that conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh has become the de-facto voice of the Republican Party, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) said Monday.

"I think it’s pretty sad," Paul said during an appearance on CNN Monday morning. "And it means that the Republicans are really starving for some type of leadership."

"He really didn’t broaden the base," the former Republican presidential candidate told the network's John Roberts. "I mean, it’s still very narrow, and that is why some of us would like to see an approach that would emphasize personal liberties and civil liberties."

Limbaugh's speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) this past weekend has been the subject of much discussion on the left and the right, with a number of Republican leaders (such as Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele) sounding off on Limbaugh's role and influence within the GOP.

"I think a lot of people like to hear what he’s saying, but I think it’s also a little bit polarizing and confrontational, and I think that’s why the Democrats are bragging that Limbaugh now speaks for the Republicans," Paul added. "So I guess the Democrats think it’s to their advantage if he’s leading the charge."

The Texas Republican also indicated there was little chance he would rekindle his presidential bid in 2012, opting instead to focus on his "Campaign for Liberty" fund.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gop; limbaugh; paulistinians; preciousbodilyfluids; ronpaul; rush; rushlimbaugh; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 last
To: truthfreedom
Ron Paul was one of the few who supported Reagan against Ford in 1976.

Does that make Ron Paul a "Ronald Reagan" republican? I highly doubt it.
141 posted on 03/02/2009 3:16:23 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

IMHO, the people behind Obama picked McCain as the most beatable candidate. Remember when he was out and then back in the primaries? It happened here in Illinois when Glenn Poshard ran against Blagoyavich. How well did that turn out?


142 posted on 03/02/2009 5:01:32 PM PST by Thebaddog (Obama really did believe that stuff he was saying during the campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: PogySailor
Like Pavlov’s dog, they dump on Rush when the MSM rings the bell.

Well.. this tells me they recognize two things about the voting population: 1. It's "celebrity-driven". One need only scan post counts at FR to see that's true (celebrities, personal scandals, missing children). 2. The population will now become far more sedentary resulting from lesser dollars - and that more people will find interactive time spent on line and reading (while the costs are yet low) or watching TV in contrast to people "going" to places (which costs more).

And, I think they hope that by targetting Rush, the MSM types can also derive profits from their "markets". Basically, what's happening happening is a "Bebop" event. The left I think is hoping the cluster formations (which will drive their revenue markets) will take place on line.

143 posted on 03/02/2009 5:13:19 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Just saying that this statement

“If Reagan was alive today, you, Mr Paul ... would be running away from him and labeling him as polarizing and confrontational.”

is factually wrong.


144 posted on 03/02/2009 5:17:44 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

wow. he is so fast to pick up and carry the leftwing water and parrot their meme of the day


145 posted on 03/02/2009 5:53:37 PM PST by GeronL (Will bankrupting America lead to socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
“dr.” paul appears to be one of those doctors who likes to sample his own pharmaceuticals.

LSD is not a safe alternative to Diazepam doc. You might want to lay off.

146 posted on 03/02/2009 6:00:26 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Professor_Leonide

And ron paul is a conservative, small government kind of person?

Why not ask him about all those earmarks he slips into spending bills such as research and marketing of wild shrimp or the earmark to renovate a privately owned movie theatre just to name two of the dozens of earmarks he slipped in last year’s budget.


147 posted on 03/02/2009 6:28:45 PM PST by 2CAVTrooper (Today we've discovered a force more powerful than luck or genius----stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Neville Paul has a nice ring to it.


148 posted on 03/02/2009 6:39:37 PM PST by 2CAVTrooper (Today we've discovered a force more powerful than luck or genius----stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom
Just saying that this statement

“If Reagan was alive today, you, Mr Paul ... would be running away from him and labeling him as polarizing and confrontational.”

is factually wrong.


Ok, you got me.

So, go ahead and explain away.

How can you claim something to be "factually wrong" if the hypothetical situation has never or will never occur?

However, knowing that Ron Paul is not a true republican, I can make the claim that he would be labeling Reagan as "polarizing and confrontational". He's doing that now against other republicans and even democrats. Ron Paul tries to play on all sides and against all sides.

That's not to say that Ron Paul is wrong on everything; I like a lot of what he has to say about the economy and economic growth. But, he's not a true republican (yeah, I know, he's a libertarian) on many other issues.
149 posted on 03/02/2009 7:29:39 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Fair enough.

There was a problem with my logic.

I guess the point I was trying to make was that many critics of Ron Paul fail to recognize that Ron Paul was one of only 4 Republican US Representatives to support Ronald Reagan over Gerald Ford in 1976.

The track record of Ron Paul supporting Reagan when very few Republicans did was the “fact” in factually, but yes, you are correct about the hypothetical.


150 posted on 03/02/2009 8:42:36 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I don’t know much about Rush, and don’t really care to; but Ron Paul has lost my respect over the years...this doesn’t help.


151 posted on 03/03/2009 1:17:27 AM PST by Rick_Michael (Have no fear "President Government" is here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob

Ron Paul - Leader of Neo-Nazi’s, 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists, anti-War On Terror groups and other assorted nuts...Pretty sad.”””

Ain’t that the truth!!


152 posted on 03/03/2009 4:57:18 PM PST by CARepublicans (www.teamsarah.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson