Posted on 04/23/2009 4:19:21 PM PDT by shadeaud
A 69-year-old man has been arrested and accused of taking inappropriate photos of women at SeaWorld
(Excerpt) Read more at ksat.com ...
Improper photography? Yes, that's a felony, fellow!
Welcome to the post-feminist paradise!
*
Thoughtcrime.
Which means he could get ejected, but not arrested.
A bill that passed the House last month aims to strengthen the crime of visual sexual aggression against children, according to state Rep. Dawn Hill, D-York.
Her involvement started when Ogunquit Police Lt. David Alexander was called to a local beach to deal with a man who appeared to be observing children entering the community bathrooms. Because the state statute prevents arrests for visual sexual aggression of a child in a public place, Alexander said he and his fellow officer could only ask the man to move along.
"There was no violation of law that we could enforce. There was nothing we could charge him with," Alexander said.
He attended a talk with Hill a week later and brought the case to her attention. Hill pledged to do what she could, Alexander said, and the result was a change through the Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee in the House, which made the law applicable in both private and public places.
Alexander said he's grateful Hill was willing to take up the cause, and is hopeful the measure will clear the Senate.
"I'll be pleased that we were able to identify this flaw and take steps to rectify it," he said.
Under the bill, if someone is arrested for viewing children in a public place, it would be a Class D felony if the child is between 12 to 14 years old and a Class C felony if the child is under 12, according to Alexander.
Hill said she believes the move was necessary to correct what she called a "loophole" in the state's criminal law statutes.
"I told Lt. Alexander that I would be happy to work with him and sponsor a bill that would correct this in the 2008 session," Hill said. "And so we did."
In arguing for the bill, Alexander said she cited public rest rooms as places where the people using them should have a reasonable expectation of privacy. She said the committee determined that there would not be any major side effects from expanding the statute to include public places.
The bill recently cleared a fiscal review, done because of the state's major prison budget crunch, and Hill said it should be heading to the Senate before long.
York Police Chief Doug Bracy said the statute would represent a fairly minor change that would help keep the public safer, especially children. He noted that York police respond fairly regularly to reports of public peepers on the town's beaches.
With ever-growing concern over sexual predators, Bracy said the arrests will also allow police to check backgrounds and determine if there is a criminal history involved.
"There is a growing outcry by the public to protect our children," Bracy said, noting that tourists from all over the country visit York.
He'll probably get off.
Yes. Pretty scary, really.
They truly are the Thought Police.
Yeah, and he probably won't serve any jail time either.
Not to carp or mussel in, but you are skating on thin ice. Comments like that mackerel bad impression. Cod you just scamp down off your perch please? :-)
He’ll serve more time than the 14 year old aspiring rapper who was turning his life around, just brought to New York by the US Navy from the Indian Sea.
Quitcher carpin’.
Orwell was an optimist.
"wacko female Dem"
Redundantly redundant.
Time for a rimshot?
Should have said “clam up”.
There’s not enough here to draw a single conclusion — myself, I would never hide to take pictures of inappropriate women.
I think you’re in a real pickerel.
Where is Ruth Buzzy and her purse when you need her?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.