Skip to comments.
Leading Candidate for the Supreme Court Thinks "court of appeals is where policy is made" (Video)
YouTube ^
| 2005
| Judge Sonia Sotomayor (Judge of the Second Court of Appeals)
Posted on 05/04/2009 7:12:23 PM PDT by kellynla
Leading Supreme Court Candidate: Courts Make Policy.
Judge Sonia Sotomayor,"All of the legal defense funds out there-- they're looking for people with court of appeals experience. Because court of appeals is where policy is made. And I know, I know this is on tape and I should never say that because we don't make law. [Laughs] I know. I know. [Laughter] I'm not promoting it, I'm not advocating it, I'm...y'know."
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: soniasotomayor; sotomayor; supremecourt; supremes
And this clown is a sitting judge on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals???
1
posted on
05/04/2009 7:12:24 PM PDT
by
kellynla
To: kellynla; All
“O” needs to pick a serf, not a nobleman to represent the empathy of the people.
2
posted on
05/04/2009 7:20:14 PM PDT
by
edcoil
(Taxes only help an evil government)
To: kellynla; Petronski; pissant; Jim Robinson; SunkenCiv
3
posted on
05/04/2009 7:26:59 PM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(To view the FR@Alabama ping list, click on my profile!)
To: kellynla
This needs to be sprayed to the media...this kind of mentality cannot be allowed in the SCOTUS.
4
posted on
05/04/2009 7:28:36 PM PDT
by
phatus maximus
( John 6:29. Learn it, love it, live it.)
To: kellynla
Socialists desire to practice legal plunder, not illegal plunder. Socialists, like all other monopolists, desire to make the law their own weapon. And when once the law is on the side of socialism, how can it be used against socialism? For when plunder is abetted by the law, it does not fear your courts, your gendarmes, and your prisons. Rather, it may call upon them for help. - "The Law" Frédéric Bastiat
5
posted on
05/04/2009 7:29:27 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: kellynla
It's going from bad to worse...I agree, I fear for my grand kids future...God Help us!
To: kellynla
Caught sight of a note that said she'd been a diabetic since childhood ~ not that there's anything wrong with that ~ but as Ruthy Ginsberg already proves, being handicapped and on the highest court leads to serious problems for lawabiding people.
I doubt the USSC could stand the strain with two of 'em.
7
posted on
05/04/2009 7:35:33 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: phatus maximus
“This needs to be sprayed to the media...this kind of mentality cannot be allowed in the SCOTUS.”
I caught it on Hannity earlier tonight.
8
posted on
05/04/2009 7:37:45 PM PDT
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: kellynla
Sonia sure doesn't sound very bright. BO should recommend this guy. He's already got his own robe.
9
posted on
05/04/2009 7:42:03 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Politicians always love to talk about "hard work." What the hell would they know about it?)
To: muawiyah
Sonia's "handicap" is not in her diabetes...
she's just dumb as a box of rocks!
How she ever graduated HS much less receive a J.D. is a mystery to me!!!
10
posted on
05/04/2009 7:45:57 PM PDT
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: kellynla
Guaranteed, it will be a ‘borking’ to end all borkings when Zero finally finds someone stupid enough to say, “Yes, I’ll accept the nomination, Mr. President.”
11
posted on
05/04/2009 7:48:02 PM PDT
by
hunter112
(SHRUG - Stop Hussein's Radical Utopian Gameplan!)
To: muawiyah
If she’s got serious health problems, it’s all the more likely she will shuffle off this mortal coil sooner than the average Supreme Court justice. Even with proper insulin management, diabetics can suffer a 20 or more years’ shortening of life span. Perhaps if it is Sotomeyer, the GOP in the Senate should softball things, saving political capital for the future. Treat her only as rough as they treated Harriet Miers.
12
posted on
05/04/2009 7:55:21 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
To: kellynla
How? Why this woman is a "threefer" ~ a minority, a female and a crippled person. (I'd say "crip" but some people think that's offensive, but as a diabetic I think I'm entitled to say "crip" anyway, jus' so's you'd know).
Not likely she could be a lead dancer with Yankee Daddy, but fur shur we don't want her there anyway.
I haven't read through her opinions all that much but we have had debates about her several years back ~ some think she's a centrist, some think she's a leftwingtard, no one thinks she's Conservative ~ and some think she's dumb as a box of rocks.
Frankly, I think diabetics presiding over serious questions of law in a formal setting is probably not a wise idea. Part of the problem is making sure they are not sitting there reading 60 on their handy, dandy meter but not realizing it because they are, after all, just sitting there. (60 is really low blood sugar). Alternatively, your typical diabetic ~ any kind ~ type 1, type 2 ~ can sit there with a 370 blood sugar reading and not notice it at all until they just fall over.
Undiagnosed diabetics are, of course, even worse. They not only don't care, they don't know!
13
posted on
05/04/2009 8:11:10 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: kellynla
Sonia Sotomayor
Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit
Incumbent
Assumed office October 7, 1998
Nominated by Bill Clinton
Preceded by J. Daniel Mahoney
Born June 25, 1954 (1954-06-25) (age 54)
The Bronx, New York
Nationality United States
Alma mater Princeton University, Yale Law School
14
posted on
05/04/2009 8:19:11 PM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
To: muawiyah
How? Why this woman is a "threefer" ~ a minority, a female and a crippled person. (I'd say "crip" but some people think that's offensive, but as a diabetic I think I'm entitled to say "crip" anyway, jus' so's you'd know). Are you really that ignorant?
15
posted on
05/04/2009 8:23:58 PM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget (July 4, 2009 see you there))
To: kellynla
I caught it on Hannity earlier tonight.
I did too. The "wink wink, nudge nudge" manner of her admission of malpractice was appalling. This arrogant elitist is an offense to the intent and integrity of our justice system.
16
posted on
05/04/2009 8:24:37 PM PDT
by
LostInBayport
(When more than 98% of the Republicans on Capitol Hill vote against a bill, it is not bipartisan.)
To: kellynla
“Because court of appeals is where policy is made.”
Given that this video is 34 seconds taken out of something else, and that her stated view is of the situation as it is, not of what it was intended to be, I have to wonder how wrong she might or might not be.
17
posted on
05/04/2009 8:29:06 PM PDT
by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
To: rockinqsranch
“Yale Law School?”
she didn't learn much while she was there now did she...
shezzzzzzzzzzzzz...
I sometimes wonder how these clowns ever graduated HS much less college & law school??? and to think the ENTIRE D.O.J. is inundated with these clowns!!! Who the hell took the Bar for these morons!!!
18
posted on
05/04/2009 8:31:13 PM PDT
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: paul51
You will have to ‘splain yourself in detail.
19
posted on
05/04/2009 8:47:48 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Ultra Sonic 007
an oldie, I just read it a couple of days ago, seems appropriate here:
20
posted on
05/05/2009 7:16:34 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson