Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leading Candidate for the Supreme Court Thinks "court of appeals is where policy is made" (Video)
YouTube ^ | 2005 | Judge Sonia Sotomayor (Judge of the Second Court of Appeals)

Posted on 05/04/2009 7:12:23 PM PDT by kellynla

Leading Supreme Court Candidate: Courts Make Policy.

Judge Sonia Sotomayor,"All of the legal defense funds out there-- they're looking for people with court of appeals experience. Because court of appeals is where policy is made. And I know, I know this is on tape and I should never say that because we don't make law. [Laughs] I know. I know. [Laughter] I'm not promoting it, I'm not advocating it, I'm...y'know."


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: soniasotomayor; sotomayor; supremecourt; supremes
And this clown is a sitting judge on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals???
1 posted on 05/04/2009 7:12:24 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla; All

“O” needs to pick a serf, not a nobleman to represent the empathy of the people.


2 posted on 05/04/2009 7:20:14 PM PDT by edcoil (Taxes only help an evil government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; Petronski; pissant; Jim Robinson; SunkenCiv

*headdesk*


3 posted on 05/04/2009 7:26:59 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (To view the FR@Alabama ping list, click on my profile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

This needs to be sprayed to the media...this kind of mentality cannot be allowed in the SCOTUS.


4 posted on 05/04/2009 7:28:36 PM PDT by phatus maximus ( John 6:29. Learn it, love it, live it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Socialists desire to practice legal plunder, not illegal plunder. Socialists, like all other monopolists, desire to make the law their own weapon. And when once the law is on the side of socialism, how can it be used against socialism? For when plunder is abetted by the law, it does not fear your courts, your gendarmes, and your prisons. Rather, it may call upon them for help. - "The Law" Frédéric Bastiat
5 posted on 05/04/2009 7:29:27 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
It's going from bad to worse...I agree, I fear for my grand kids future...God Help us!
6 posted on 05/04/2009 7:32:53 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Caught sight of a note that said she'd been a diabetic since childhood ~ not that there's anything wrong with that ~ but as Ruthy Ginsberg already proves, being handicapped and on the highest court leads to serious problems for lawabiding people.

I doubt the USSC could stand the strain with two of 'em.

7 posted on 05/04/2009 7:35:33 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phatus maximus

“This needs to be sprayed to the media...this kind of mentality cannot be allowed in the SCOTUS.”

I caught it on Hannity earlier tonight.


8 posted on 05/04/2009 7:37:45 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Sonia sure doesn't sound very bright. BO should recommend this guy. He's already got his own robe.

Photobucket

9 posted on 05/04/2009 7:42:03 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Politicians always love to talk about "hard work." What the hell would they know about it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Sonia's "handicap" is not in her diabetes...
she's just dumb as a box of rocks!
How she ever graduated HS much less receive a J.D. is a mystery to me!!!
10 posted on 05/04/2009 7:45:57 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Guaranteed, it will be a ‘borking’ to end all borkings when Zero finally finds someone stupid enough to say, “Yes, I’ll accept the nomination, Mr. President.”


11 posted on 05/04/2009 7:48:02 PM PDT by hunter112 (SHRUG - Stop Hussein's Radical Utopian Gameplan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

If she’s got serious health problems, it’s all the more likely she will shuffle off this mortal coil sooner than the average Supreme Court justice. Even with proper insulin management, diabetics can suffer a 20 or more years’ shortening of life span. Perhaps if it is Sotomeyer, the GOP in the Senate should softball things, saving political capital for the future. Treat her only as rough as they treated Harriet Miers.


12 posted on 05/04/2009 7:55:21 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
How? Why this woman is a "threefer" ~ a minority, a female and a crippled person. (I'd say "crip" but some people think that's offensive, but as a diabetic I think I'm entitled to say "crip" anyway, jus' so's you'd know).

Not likely she could be a lead dancer with Yankee Daddy, but fur shur we don't want her there anyway.

I haven't read through her opinions all that much but we have had debates about her several years back ~ some think she's a centrist, some think she's a leftwingtard, no one thinks she's Conservative ~ and some think she's dumb as a box of rocks.

Frankly, I think diabetics presiding over serious questions of law in a formal setting is probably not a wise idea. Part of the problem is making sure they are not sitting there reading 60 on their handy, dandy meter but not realizing it because they are, after all, just sitting there. (60 is really low blood sugar). Alternatively, your typical diabetic ~ any kind ~ type 1, type 2 ~ can sit there with a 370 blood sugar reading and not notice it at all until they just fall over.

Undiagnosed diabetics are, of course, even worse. They not only don't care, they don't know!

13 posted on 05/04/2009 8:11:10 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Sonia Sotomayor

Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit

Incumbent

Assumed office October 7, 1998
Nominated by Bill Clinton
Preceded by J. Daniel Mahoney

Born June 25, 1954 (1954-06-25) (age 54)
The Bronx, New York

Nationality United States

Alma mater Princeton University, Yale Law School


14 posted on 05/04/2009 8:19:11 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
How? Why this woman is a "threefer" ~ a minority, a female and a crippled person. (I'd say "crip" but some people think that's offensive, but as a diabetic I think I'm entitled to say "crip" anyway, jus' so's you'd know).

Are you really that ignorant?

15 posted on 05/04/2009 8:23:58 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget (July 4, 2009 see you there))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I caught it on Hannity earlier tonight.

I did too. The "wink wink, nudge nudge" manner of her admission of malpractice was appalling. This arrogant elitist is an offense to the intent and integrity of our justice system.
16 posted on 05/04/2009 8:24:37 PM PDT by LostInBayport (When more than 98% of the Republicans on Capitol Hill vote against a bill, it is not bipartisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

“Because court of appeals is where policy is made.”

Given that this video is 34 seconds taken out of something else, and that her stated view is of the situation as it is, not of what it was intended to be, I have to wonder how wrong she might or might not be.


17 posted on 05/04/2009 8:29:06 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
“Yale Law School?”

she didn't learn much while she was there now did she...

shezzzzzzzzzzzzz...

I sometimes wonder how these clowns ever graduated HS much less college & law school??? and to think the ENTIRE D.O.J. is inundated with these clowns!!! Who the hell took the Bar for these morons!!!

18 posted on 05/04/2009 8:31:13 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: paul51

You will have to ‘splain yourself in detail.


19 posted on 05/04/2009 8:47:48 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
an oldie, I just read it a couple of days ago, seems appropriate here:
20 posted on 05/05/2009 7:16:34 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson