Posted on 05/06/2009 7:24:33 AM PDT by tcrlaf
With a
Pair of heavy-duty
Zircon-encrusted tweezers in my hand
Every other wrangler would say
I was mighty grand
WE don’ need no stinkin’ sarcasm tags.
God bless Oklahoma!
Pity there isn't something in the Constitution that's really clear about the subject, ya know something like "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." That would clear it all up immediatly, wouldn't it?
Depends on the can and the round. I drop a .22 converter into my suppressed AR15 and run subsonic rounds, and all you hear is the action cycle (a pretty quiet sound at that). "Hollywood quiet" is a reality, if a rarity.
ping
Too many tests to keep track of.
Yeppers, that’s why I pinged you!
Unless of course you wish to follow strict osha guidelines concerning hearing damage and all.
I wonder if one can sue the feds based on osha guidelines regards the use of silencers and suppersors, kinda like workplace safety and all.
“God bless your willingness. It is your greatest strength on this topic. “
Bet you’d never think you’d see this kinda reply, I’ll stand corrected. I rather be an honest gentleman that screwed up and admit it than save face and run away.
I did a little more non-fictional reading. Seems, even that, can be a little conflicting at times.
Moose Drool is the best. I use it as a handle online often.
Bet you’d never think you’d see this kinda reply, I’ll stand corrected.
“Ask the sponsoring legislators to address the cases I cited here, and find out how un-serious the state yokels are. If they don’t know these cases and have a specific plan to surmount them, they aren’t serious.”
Is that you Obama?
Never see a liberal admit when they are wrong. LOL.
Gotcha. The only Zappa album I’m familiar with is Sheik Yerbouti. And it’s a good one.
Also, there was a grand tradition in the old west that applies here. Montana can forbid state officers from assisting federals as the try to enforce their gun laws in Montana. This can include Montana jails and lockups. None of this need be available for federal use. This was a Big reason that marshals used to need good relations with the sheriff back in the frontier days.
The libs have even reinforced the validity of this, all over the country, by forbidding local law enforcement from assisting the Feds on illegal immigration issues.
I listened to "Freak Out" (Suzy? Suzy Creamcheese? Is that You?) when it came out. If you like Sheik Yerbouti, you'll like Overnight Sensation and Apostrophe (very "pop" musical, fun listening). He was a liberal puke, but damn, he was a fantastic musical artist.
Montana Police arresting ATF agents sounds at least about as likely your US Govt invasion of Montana. And how exactly does the “Feds overrun Montana pretty easy” part work? You know you can’t even begin to predict how this would play in the other states.
It’s a fair bet some other states would be outraged into supporting behaviors. Including the demands their own senators and congressmen would face from their outraged constituents. Think the tea party was a turn out? Wait and see what Tanks rolling through Montana would do. Talk about mass anger! Feds wont dare make a “Concord” move.
Its definately not as easy as “line up the panzers and roll across montana”.
“None of these laws are likely to be definitive, but the sure do point to a trend”
Well put. THAT is the point, can anyone honestly imagine these legislative moves happening even 10 years ago?
Which is why this is going take many states making the push simultaneously - as they seem to be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.