Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: libbylu
That's all true, but her folksy way of speaking plays well in states we already own. Dan Quayle was plain-spoken and had all the right ideas, but he had this "dunce" image painted on him by the MSM and had no chance of ever getting the Presidency.
Many will disagree with me, but our #1 priority should be winning in 2012. Sarah may be better than Romney on conservative principles, but I'd rather have a candidate that can win. If I were betting right now, I think Romeny/Jindal would be our best shot of preventing another 4 years of Socialism.
55 posted on 08/02/2009 9:16:45 AM PDT by jackinbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: jackinbox

The difference between Palin and Quayle.
Sarah draws the huge crowds that the other candidates could not draw.
She also energized them like the other candidates could not.

Half my relatives have New York and New Jersey accents
which makes no difference when it comes to Palin’s.


116 posted on 08/02/2009 2:26:55 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: jackinbox; greyfoxx39; Godzilla; Jim Robinson

Romney in ‘12?

Just say “HELL NO! NEVER!”

“Romneycare” in Massachusetts IS socialised medicine, and a lot of other things that too-slick-by-half knucklehead has done are so close to socialism/liberalism it is not possible to determine any difference.

Romney would represent another 4 years of socialism - only the march music would be slower.

If I were betting right now I’d say you are just another one of many of the reeking romneybots that come out from under a rock every time Sarah Palin’s name is mentioned.

That slimy, oily substance that follows in his wake is the slug trail of his real political character. It has long since been expose that the undermining of Sarah Palin leaking information from within the GOP to enemies was coming from Romney devotees.

If Bobby Jindal is even half as smart as his governing policies and decisions so far indicate, he would not come within a country mile of the Romney-stench.

Try Palin/Jindal for 2012 and you will have a smart, true conservative combo that rings true with voters.

The only way Mitt will ever see the inside of the WH on a recurrent basis would be as a (maybe)low-level Palin/Jindal Cabinet appointee - or by taking one of those nifty tours open to the general public.

Screw Mitt - ‘cause that’s what his minions tried to do to Palin and we all know it.

A.A.C.

Waitaminnit - I’ll tell you how I really feel.


126 posted on 08/02/2009 5:39:40 PM PDT by AmericanArchConservative (Armour on, Lances high, Swords out, Bows drawn, Shields front ... Eagles UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: jackinbox
but I'd rather have a candidate that can win.

That's how McCain was chosen.

129 posted on 08/02/2009 6:35:21 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries for the American farmer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson