Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarian Party throws Reagan under the bus
North Star National ^ | October 2nd, 2009

Posted on 10/02/2009 1:12:54 PM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2009 1:12:54 PM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Wouldn’t Congress have to cut the size of government? Isn’t it illegal for a Prez not to spend appropriated monies?


2 posted on 10/02/2009 1:14:46 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
The Libertarian Party’s chairman said that the Republican Party’s hero “was not serious about cutting the size of government.”

When is the Libertarian Party going to get serious about becoming a viable political party?
3 posted on 10/02/2009 1:14:54 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Libertarian Party throws Reagan under the bus

The Libertarian Party’s chairman said that the Republican Party’s hero “was not serious about cutting the size of government.”

_________________________________________________

For the life of me... I swear I don’t understand how so many FReepers can defend the Liberaltarian Party.

Sheesh!


4 posted on 10/02/2009 1:15:37 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (I am Legend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

His tax cuts tripled the revenue to the federal govt. So the increase inspending is a misleading without reference to monies to the fed.


5 posted on 10/02/2009 1:16:03 PM PDT by Bruinator (People are.............Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_who
When is the Libertarian Party going to get serious about becoming a viable political party?

Hopefully never. Take heart in the fact that "seriousness" and subscribing to liberatarian political philosophy are on opposite ends of the spectrum.

6 posted on 10/02/2009 1:18:08 PM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Reagan operated without control of Congress. Makes a big difference. Also consider the struggle Obama is having enacting his far left agenda even with both Houses of Congress firmly under the control of his party, and with full support of the legacy media...


7 posted on 10/02/2009 1:19:03 PM PDT by sourcery (Those whom the gods would destroy they first make socialist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The LP is a bunch of anti-semites, racists, and loners. And those are the good ones. Avoid them like the Obamist plague that they are.


8 posted on 10/02/2009 1:19:18 PM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
They're either into pot, or pr0n.

Cheers!

9 posted on 10/02/2009 1:19:40 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Didn’t Bush form the DHS?


10 posted on 10/02/2009 1:20:13 PM PDT by wastedyears (The best aid we could ever give Africa would be thousands of rifles to throw out their own dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Not all of us. I just want the federal government to keep their damn hands off of my rights, my pocketbook, and my family, and go back to doing what they’re supposed to, based on their Constitutional powers.


11 posted on 10/02/2009 1:22:26 PM PDT by TheLurkerX (If you want renewable energy, I'm sure the founding fathers are spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Yes, Homeland Security was done after 9/11/2001


12 posted on 10/02/2009 1:25:27 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
For the life of me... I swear I don’t understand how so many FReepers can defend the Liberaltarian Party.

Its the nature of the internet. Everyone feels like his opinion is valid. A lot of people here don't get this one: There is the political "right," and then there are Libertarians, Republicans, and Conservatives. Three very distinct groups, with many things in common. All are on the political right, but have different viewpoints. Libertarians are too flaky to grasp that one. Then, we have a webpage started by a one-time Conservative for Conservatives. Since libertarians already failed to make the distinction once, here they are. The webpage was intended to be for Conservatives as opposed to Republicans, but libertarians never leared their place either. It doesn't help that our founder is on record being pretty sympathetic to libertarians in the past. He never retracted that stuff, and libertarians are only to happy to bring it up whenever they are told to go find their own website.

13 posted on 10/02/2009 1:25:41 PM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Earth to Libertarians...please learn how our government operates before making anymore statements. Your friend, Debs


14 posted on 10/02/2009 1:27:55 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_who

The Libertarian Party, like other parties, is only there to be a spoiler. They have a serious movement to discredit the Republicans even though they have more in common with than the Democrats. The reason. I don’t know.

Being Libertarian or Declined to State or Independent is just “feel good” measures with no substance.


15 posted on 10/02/2009 1:29:15 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; bamahead; djsherin; rabscuttle385

Interesting argument. I would say that Reagan did good and bad things economically w government growth.

The good news: He won the cold war and gave us a peace divident under Clinton

The bad news: His legacy promoted the myth that everyone’s tax cut pays for itself, that government doesnt cost anything (Bush Sr got the blame) and no one must pay. This myth allowed GWB to destroy the republican party and capitalism without even a peace dividend to pay the debt. Bush used printed money, Reagan borrowed.


16 posted on 10/02/2009 1:29:29 PM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruinator

“His tax cuts tripled the revenue to the federal govt.”

The Libertarianistas are being intellectually dishonest here (most people say cuts when in fact everybody knows that it means slowing the rate of growth of government spending)...The tax cuts as you said were half the equation.

The other half was impeded by Dem majorities in Congress who refused to cut spending. So the Dems and media refuse to cut spending, blame the budget deficit on Reagan for 6 of the 8 years. That mantra was all they had on Reagan.

Now of course, Lord Obama runs up an annual deficit of 1.8 Trillion compared to Reagan’s 150-225 billion and Bush’s 450 billion...and now the Leftists love deficits.


17 posted on 10/02/2009 1:29:48 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (It's us against them...the Establishment RINOs vs rank and file...Sarah Palin or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dr_who; Revolting cat!
When is the Libertarian Party going to get serious about becoming a viable political party?

At 4:20

18 posted on 10/02/2009 1:33:58 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheLurkerX

“I just want the federal government to keep their damn hands off of my rights, my pocketbook, and my family, and go back to doing what they’re supposed to, based on their Constitutional powers.”


And because this is a participatory government, controlled by a two party system, sniping from the sidelines is kind of irrelevant. If you want to have your opinion to matter, get involved at the caucus level. Don’t try for everything all at once. It’s a big ship. The left has been chipping away at this shot of theirs since FDR died in office. Look at how the society has crumbled, through little cracks and opportune bites. Short of a revolution, that’s how it will be won back. They have provided us a chance at a really big bite in 2010. Everyone who wants this nation to continue needs to get into the game and scuttle the ambitions of the radicals in office. Please don’t stand on the sidelines or run to a third party and let the likes of McCain destroy our chances.


19 posted on 10/02/2009 1:34:15 PM PDT by Steamburg ( Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Every budget Reagan sent up to congress was (quote) “Dead on arrival” by Tip O’Neil,etal.


20 posted on 10/02/2009 1:34:50 PM PDT by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson