Posted on 10/29/2009 10:19:10 AM PDT by Elderberry
Judge Carter Ruling on MTD
“...But, in 2012, his eligibility could be challenged by one of his Democrat opponents in the primary...”
How about one of his Republican opponents as well? They would have an equal stake in the matter.
“And, it appears that the Smith declaration alleging Orly asked him to commit perjury was “real” and it was delivered. Carter references it, and perhaps another deceleration that Orly allegedly suborned perjury. He writes in his order that the court is “deeply concerned” about it.”
Or!
The judge is correct. And you are incorrect.
They practice judicial tyranny on a daily basis. Judges overturn the electorate’s wishes as a matter of practice.
I suspect the Judge may have been paid a visit from one of 0bama’s “Truth Squads” and given an offer he couldn’t refuse.
I really doubt Orly asked anyone to lie. Look at how she is discredited right here on FR.
Yes, of course and the RNC could challenge it. I didn't include it in my post to you because I mentioned it up-thread.
I suggest you read that again. Judge Carter noted that Keyes claim to damages, since he received less than one percent of the votes cast, was "too speculative to establish standing."
...- after Obama’s swearing in, Obama IS POTUS and can only be removed by Congress. Only Congress has standing, as is outlined in the Constitution.
He didn't say that either.
So, to you, enforcement of The Constitution, is akin to placating a "howling mob"? Something tells me you'd like to be an 0bama groupie.
Funny, that part wasn't in the post I responded to.
Your post reflected your approval of a judge upholding the very same doccument that zer0 is shredding and stuffing up our collective arses
Loosing runs in your family?
No doubt they will dismiss as well.
While Clinton escaped criminal liability because of the politics of issue, he didn't escaped entirely unscathed. Remember, he lost his license to practice law for a period of time - I think 5 years, or longer - and the sanction levied against him by the Federal District judge was fairly significant, IIRC.
“...As soon as Obama officially declares himself a candidate for 2012, anyone who decides to run for POTUS can file suit for proof of eligibility....”
Let’s say that happens. Wouldn’t he have to declare for re-election by 2011? Say a Pub throws their hat in the ring then. He ore she could ask for it right off the bat. If he then produces it and it shows what we all think it shows, and it proves he is an illegal usurper, couldn’t he be kicked out of office then and there? That would mean we would have to deal with this PØS for another two years.
Well, I can dream can’t I?
When the lying marxist fraud is finally exposed as the “usurper” that Taitz claims, she will be vindicated.
What Judge Carter wrote:
Additionally, the Court has received several sworn affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this Court to perjure themselves.
He is not accusing her of perjury, he is says that others have accused Orly of asking them to perjure themselves.
What??? A stand up Marine like Judge Carter knuckling under to Obama's henchmen????? What does that say about him?
Meaning that the Constitution is now only for politicians?
No, the judge had a lengthy discussion in his opinion about this. Prior to the swearing-in of Obama, McCain AND Alan Keyes both had standing. The judge was very careful not to exclude a candidate because they were a minor candidate.
The judge considers the swearing-in ceremony the point at which Obama IS POTUS. Now, only Congress has standing.
Well you had better hurry. Otherwise Orly may find herself without a law license and $20k poorer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.