Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Glenn Beck right about Obama's eligibility not being a valid issue? (online poll)
World Net Daily ^ | 01/04/10 | WND

Posted on 01/05/2010 11:38:50 AM PST by circumbendibus

Is Glenn Beck right about Obama's eligibility not being a valid issue?

Yes, Beck is finally right about something
Yes, Beck is driving mainstream credibility
Yes, the birthers are obviously unhinged and off base
Yes, and he's right that this issue is providing cover to the Obama administration
Yes, Beck is always right
Yes
I don't know, but his opinion has given me reason to reconsider my views
No, I love Beck and usually agree with him, but he's just plain wrong on this one
No, that's what living and working in New York will do to you
No, but because Obama has been so good for Beck's career, the host doesn't wish to see his meal ticket disqualified
No, and deep down I think Beck himself knows the truth
No, Beck is just fishing for mainstream credibility
No, I agree with Hannity, Limbaugh, Savage and Dobbs that it's unquestionably a legitimate issue
No
Other

(Excerpt) Read more at forums.wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beck; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; gb; glennbeck; poll; wingnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: circumbendibus

I still haven’t figured out how someone who wasn’t born in this country wound up with a birth notice in a Hawaiian newspaper in 1961, making this the most prescient group of conspirators in history. (Yes, I know the arguments, it doesn’t say which hospital and it doesn’t include his name. Then again neither do the other announcements on the page.)

At some point, the birther movement starts to sound like those who continue to whine that the Supreme Court stole the election for Bush over Gore. Obama won’t release the original COLB for at least one of three reasons:
A. It doesn’t exist.
B. It has some other embarrassing information.
C. Not releasing it is a continued distraction that enables them to marginalize all of their opponents by painting them with the ‘birther’ brush.

My guess is that ‘C’ is the most likely answer.

There are far more important and troubling issues related to the real damage that Obama is doing to the republic and that is where Beck’s attention is rightly focused. Even if it were shown that he was born in Moscow, a spawn of Satan via a descendant of Joseph Stalin, such a revelation would not be a silver bullet (it’s a metaphor, please) that would end his presidency.

However, continuing to sound the alarm regarding the philosophical mindset and likely nefarious intent of those he has surrounded himself with is far more important than engaging in some sideshow controversy that serves only to provide joke fodder for Obama, Axelrod, Plouffe, Gibbs, Jarrett, et all as they sit around the Oval Office and enjoy a beer at the end of the day.


21 posted on 01/05/2010 12:27:41 PM PST by newheart ("It will keep the government out of your health care decisions..." Barack Obama, July 23, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
World Net Daily can have my e-mail address when they pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
22 posted on 01/05/2010 12:28:10 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
Yes it is a legitimate issue as President Obama has made it an issue to be used to his advantage and political gain.

Obama could stop the controversy for about 20 dollars in fees to the State of Hawaii that would authorize them to release the original certificate on file. He has not done this as it is advantageous to him for one of the following reasons.

1. He is not legally qualified for the office of President
and must hide this fact to continue in office.

2. He is legally qualified and gains political capitol as
we make fools of ourselves trying to prove he is not
legally qualified for the office of president.

Either 1 or 2 is the answer and it is President Obama that has created this controversy.

23 posted on 01/05/2010 12:30:43 PM PST by cpdiii (roughneck, oilfield trash and proud of it, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, iconoclast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
what I'd like to know is what is this all out attack from Worldnet and their followers on Beck? seems strange to me.
24 posted on 01/05/2010 12:34:49 PM PST by alaskamomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
If a person does not defend the Constitution then they are NOT a conservative.

It really is that simple!

YOU are correct! It IS as simple as that!

25 posted on 01/05/2010 12:40:24 PM PST by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
“Obama could stop the controversy for about 20 dollars in fees to the State of Hawaii that would authorize them to release the original certificate on file.”

He did, and that doesn't even register with you folks, let alone stop the controversy. Here's actual reality from the state of Hawaii:

[[No, you can't obtain a “certificate of live birth” anymore.

The state Department of Health no longer issues copies of paper birth certificates as was done in the past, said spokeswoman Janice Okubo.

The department only issues “certifications” of live births, and that is the “official birth certificate” issued by the state of Hawaii, she said.

And, it's only available in electronic form.

Okubo explained that the Health Department went paperless in 2001.

“At that time, all information for births from 1908 (on) was put into electronic files for consistent reporting,” she said.

Information about births is transferred electronically from hospitals to the department.

“The electronic record of the birth is what (the Health Department) now keeps on file in order to provide same-day certified copies at our help window for most requests,” Okubo said.

Asked for more information about the short-form versus long-form birth documents, Okubo said the Health Department “does not have a short-form or long-form certificate.”

“The birth certificate form has been modified over the years and decades to conform to national standards and models,” she said.

Okubo also emphasized the certification form “contains all the information needed by all federal government agencies for transactions requiring a birth certificate.”

She added that the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the state's current certification of live birth “as an official birth certificate meeting all federal and other requirements.”

The issue of what constitutes an official Hawaii birth certificate received national attention during last year's presidential campaign. Those who doubted Barack Obama’s American citizenship called the copy of the Hawaii birth document posted on his campaign Web site a fake.

Asked about that document, Okubo said, “This is the same certified copy everyone receives when they request a birth certificate.”]]

He did what you asked. He got the only actual documentation Hawaii issues. You don't care. Why should he waste another moment's consideration on you?

Beck can see that. Obviously, I think Beck is correct.

26 posted on 01/05/2010 12:42:11 PM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
If a person does not defend the Constitution then they are NOT a conservative.

Agreed. If we don't have the Constitution in common we have nothing.

27 posted on 01/05/2010 12:44:39 PM PST by paulycy (AMERICA: Less safe. Less free. More broke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest
Except there is no definition of natural born citizen in the Constitution that would preclude Obama from being one. I guess Dick Cheney and Chief Justice Roberts aren't conservatives, either, since they didn't defend your made-up interpretation of the Constitution when they had the chance.
28 posted on 01/05/2010 12:45:10 PM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Yeppers. Same here...


29 posted on 01/05/2010 12:46:33 PM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
"If other things are more important that the Constitution, then Beck and the rest are NOT conservatives."

EGGSactly Batman!

Now the next question: If there is credible evidence that Obama does not meet the requirements to be POTUS then how does the Constitution remedy the situation?

30 posted on 01/05/2010 12:53:17 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The BC issue would have gone away if everything else was out in the open. Obama’s entire life has been wiped clean, and I for one want to know the hell WHY?


31 posted on 01/05/2010 12:57:47 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

Won’t provide my email, so can’t vote there. I’d vote (these three!):

No, I love Beck and usually agree with him, but he’s just plain wrong on this one
No, and deep down I think Beck himself knows the truth
No, I agree with Hannity, Limbaugh, Savage and Dobbs that it’s unquestionably a legitimate issue


32 posted on 01/05/2010 1:02:44 PM PST by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

I have a good idea why, and it ain’t pretty


33 posted on 01/05/2010 1:21:48 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Crim
I listened to him yesterday talk about this...and Beck is right...even if you had some kind of definitive proof...getting it through the courts to actually do anything about it would take WAY TOO LONG!

And Obama wants us talking about his birth certificate, otherwise he wouldn't hide it.

So I like the Limbaugh method of ignore it, except for the occasional joke.

34 posted on 01/05/2010 1:27:39 PM PST by NeoCaveman (you betcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
If other things are more important that the Constitution, then Beck and the rest are NOT conservatives. They are something else. ( A paid for “controlled opposition”, maybe?)


35 posted on 01/05/2010 1:31:05 PM PST by NeoCaveman (you betcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
Well considering the ONLY person verified to have actually seen the BC info along with his passport information and that agreed to testify under oath...was murdered with a shot to the head while sitting in his car right before he was going to give his testimony...

I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY NO ONE WANTS TO GET TO CLOSE TO THE TRUTH ABOUT THIS...

However...why isn't Glenn Beck investigating the death of that witness? Why can't the media explore and implore the police to solve this murder? How is it possible that the “manager” of this murdered person just happens to find himself in the role of adviser to the POTUS on security issues?

What could be so damning that a possible cover-up included a professional hit? Isn't that newsworthy? Where are the Bernstein's and Woodward's of our time? What about Brietbart, why isn't he looking into this? Is Obama skirting his “civilian” police force statements by enabling INTERPOL the ability to enforce his unconstitutional decisions and commitments to new global order?

Why isn't anyone investigation the real nefarious agenda's of the green movement? GREEN=RED?

36 posted on 01/05/2010 1:34:22 PM PST by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative
He did what you asked. He got the only actual documentation Hawaii issues. You don't care. Why should he waste another moment's consideration on you?

Still tying to pull the wool over everyone's eyes I see. Obama's supposed COLB was issued in 2007 when long form certificates were available and required for Homelands documentation. When did they change that and why? Did you know one can still get a copy of their long form certificate by request?

37 posted on 01/05/2010 1:48:43 PM PST by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

yep! It is plain. He is NOT president.


38 posted on 01/05/2010 2:12:56 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

You have to be logged in to vote. WND sucks.


39 posted on 01/05/2010 2:16:11 PM PST by Silly ("Okay, I'm getting just a little sick of this bereaved chicken-widow crap!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
"He is NOT president."

No, he is the POTUS. The election was held and the Electoral College voted and Congress Certified it. But again what is the remedy in the Constitution to remove him from office if he does not meet the requirements?

40 posted on 01/05/2010 2:18:11 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson