Hegel's Dialectic: Erasing Christianity through the Psycho-Political 'Consensus Process'

Renew America ^ | March 15, 2010 | Linda Kimball

[spirited irish]

Julian Huxley, the head of UNESCO in 1947, wrote a book titled, “UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy.” His book was a blueprint for a New World Order that called for a single 'new' spirituality---a mixture of Buddhist materialist-pantheism, Liberalized 'pantheistic' Christianity, Gnosticism, and other occult traditions--- one language, and one way of thinking. He believed a global order could be brought about through the universal implementation of Hegel’s Dialectic process. Huxley observed,

“The task before UNESCO…is to help the emergence of a single world culture with its own philosophy and background of ideas and with its own broad purpose.”

Huxley spoke of two opposing worldviews---one founded on supernatural creation and the other on atheist evolutionism--confronting each other from the West and the East. In describing them he said,

“You may categorize the two philosophies as…individualism versus collectivism or as the American versus the Russian…or as capitalism versus communism, or as Christianity versus Marxism. Can these opposites be reconciled, this antithesis be resolved in a higher synthesis? I believe…this can happen…through the inexorable dialectic of evolution.” (http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/julian-huxley.htm)

The concept of dialectics has been around for a long time. In the American Dictionary of the English Language, 1828, Noah Webster defined dialectics as: “That branch of logic which teaches the rules and modes of reasoning.” Simply stated, dialectics refers to ‘position’ versus ‘opposition’ or ‘thesis’ versus ‘antithesis,' or 'truth' versus 'falsehood.’ By the traditional rules of conduct, if thesis is correct then it follows logically that antithesis is incorrect.

Georg Hegel, a master magician in the Hermetic tradition and an Enlightenment shock trooper of evil, discarded the rules and turned the concept upside-down by equalizing thesis and antithesis, which resulted in moral relativity. ‘New truth,’ a merging of truth and falsehood and/or Buddhist materialist-pantheism and Christianity for example, is now found in something called ‘synthesis,' or 'consensus,' the favored vernacular of Progressive Liberals.

Hegelian Dialect is a perfect example of what J. Budziszewski, the author of "What We Can’t Not Know" termed the “black magic spells of imposture and unraveling.” Hegel’s form of dialectics is an impostor and its' purpose is to deceptively unravel truth and norms and then replace them with a ‘new truth’ which is yet another impostor.

Hegel’s ‘black magic’ Dialectics is the strange fire fueling the weapon of mass destruction unwittingly wielded by mind-conditioned Americans and Westerners on behalf of Transnational Progressive New Agers and fellow travelers in their war against the West's traditional Christian-based worldview and cultural infrastructure.

Called “group dynamics” or the “consensus process,” Hegel's dialectic is a psycho political behavior and belief modification technique used with great success by Vietnamese communists against American POWs and by Chinese communists against dissidents.

The foundation and key strategy of the consensus process is the knowledge that all individuals have an inherent fear of being alienated from the group. During sensitivity-training and diversity-training sessions, skillful change-agents (facilitators) psychologically manipulate this fear to herd selected victims toward a preplanned conclusion that induces them to compromise both conscience and position. This is the consensus process in a nut shell, and when we hear Liberals screaming for ‘consensus,' they’re really demanding that they be allowed to ‘facilitate’ the compromise of conscience which leads to the abandonment of Christian-based Western ideals and principles.

There are three steps to the consensus process. They are called, “Unfreezing the present level, moving to the new level, and freezing group life on the new level.” In order to speed up the unfreezing phase, communists resorted to physical torture, shock 'therapy,' and mind-altering drugs. In America, emotional pain, intimidation, and fear are precipitated by way of vicious psychological bullying such as sadistic ridicule, character assassination, destructive criticism, labeling, and spreading lies. Until total control has been achieved, psycho politics will remain the preferred method.

There are four key elements necessary for a successful ‘consensus process’ operation. They are:

1.Multicultural and/or diverse groups, for instance 'gays,' atheists, Wiccans, or Muslims, fueled by resentment and envy---necessary for causing social conflict.

2.A traditional social or cultural issue around which conflict can be created. For example, the Boy Scouts, Christmas, traditional marriage, and male-female sex norms are demonized as ‘unfair, exclusionary, insensitive, intolerant, racist, homophobic, and hurtful’ to diverse groups.

3.The dialoguing to consensus process.

4.The predetermined outcome. For example: Christmas parades successfully recast as "Festival of Lights” or “Winter Holiday” parades that are inclusive of gay 'erotomaniac' celebrants; traditional marriage compromised by 'gay' unions.

The consensus process has been so successful at unraveling the West's traditional culture that here in America for example, Christianity has been banned from government on all levels as well as from schools and increasingly from public areas. Christians have lost their jobs, been jailed, and their children harassed and even suspended for daring to express their Christian beliefs in any way. Anti-Christian bigotry has become so bad that John Gibson observed,

“There is this kind of casual and accepted bias against Christians and Christian symbols.” (The War on Christmas: How the Liberal Plot to Ban the Sacred Christian Holiday is Worse Than You Thought, John Gibson).

Shock-troopers of evil concur:

“We have battled in America since the century’s turn to bring to nothing…all Christian influences and we are succeeding. You must work until officials of city, county, and state will not think twice before they pounce upon religious groups as public enemies. (there must) be a…foaming hatred of religion…a belief that Christian practice is vicious, bad, insanity causing, publicly hated and intolerable.” (Red Communist Textbook on Psychopolitics)

“I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology. Its importance has been…increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated.” Bertrand Russell

John Gibson asked a Eugene, Oregon city manager why he had banned Christmas trees. His politically correct mind-conformed response, “Well, because they’re Christian.”

This manager and countless scores of other Americans testify to the enormous success thus far achieved by psycho political operatives. Having been “unfrozen” from the level whereon America’s traditional worldview resides and successfully ‘moved’ to the desired level and then ‘frozen’ there, they now serve their new masters evil desires by mindlessly destroying the source of both their liberties and their human worth---Christianity.

“Oh but, Christianity has nothing to do with either the founding of our nation or with our rights and freedoms,” proclaim mind-conditioned scoffers, doubters, atheists, and skeptics both here in America and throughout the West. The truth however has been ‘hiding’ in full view, but because their minds are darkened by black magic spells and their eyes made sightless by black magic dust, the mind-conditioned cannot see Truth even when it looks them in the face. In boasting of his clever blueprint, Huxley for example, unwittingly ‘confessed’ the truth when he said of the two opposing philosophies, “You may categorize the two philosophies as…Christianity versus Marxism.”

Copyright Linda Kimball 2010 http://patriotsandliberty.com/

Note: This article was originally published in 2005. This is the updated version.

Linda writes on culture, politics, scientism, and worldview.

[glide625]

It works as well when the individual has no beliefe in God and has adopted the secular humanist standard. In that case human kind and the “group” become all important thus reinforcing power of alienation. This is precisely why the Communists always supress the Church and ulitmately find it necessary to kill believers. Thus for example, the Hegelian Dialectic is being daily used in the public school system to shame certain ethnic groups into the belief that because of historical events they are beholden to other ethnic groups notwithstanding the fact that those historical events were doubtless beyond the students control. In this manner, the public schools produce self-hating white liberals for whom the idea of acceptance and popularity with the “others” takes prime importance. Now of course the same technique is being used by the Gay rights groups to indoctrinate and recruit youngsters into alternate sexual preferences. Of course, by replacing God with secular humanism and moral relativity as opposed to moral certainty, the Communists have enabled the anti-life groups. Here the idea is that if everyone does abortion or infanticide then it’s o.k. and acceptable because everyone else is doing it. Same will of course hold true on pulling the plug on Granny. The connundrum this ultimately presents the Communist is that at the end of the day one finds that they have created a society not unlike Lord of the Flys and they can find themselves inadvertently careening toward anarchy.

[ETL]

On the other hand there is atheist evolutionism

How can anyone say with absolute certainty that no god exists. Believing there is no god as atheists do is more of a faith-based system than any traditional religion. It is far more likely than not that there is some form of superior intelligence responsible for the universe, and also that humans beings are especially tuned into it. Physical chemistry professor Lothar Schaefer goes into this subject deeply in his book, "In Search of Divine Reality: Science as a Source of Inspiration".

For anyone interested in the strange workings of quantum mechanics, here are links to a perhaps a bit 'dry' at first but soon fascinating 2-part interview. It's done in such a way as to be easily comprehensible to anyone slightly familiar with the subject:

Program: Science and the Written Word:

A regular series produced by CUNY-TV [City University of New York] featuring interviews with
authors of new books on science. Hosted by Lou Massa, professor of
chemistry and physics at Hunter College/CUNY.

Guest: Lothar Schafer

Professor of Physical Chemistry , University of Arkansas
In this 2-part interview, Lothar Schafer talks about his book “In
Search of Divine Reality”. The tries to make connections among
science, religion, and the arts.

Part-1(an audio link will be found on the page that comes up)
Taped: 11/08/1999 Running Time: 0:27min.
http://www.cuny.tv/audiovideo/action.lasso?-database=CUNYPROG&-response=detail2.lasso&-table=webprogdetail2&-sortField=TapeDate&-sortOrder=descending&-sortField=SeriesTitle&-sortOrder=ascending&-sortField=Title&-sortOrder=ascending&-logicalOperator=OR&-op=bw&SeriesTitle=lothar&-op=bw&Title=lothar&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=1&-search
______________________________________

Part-2(an audio link will be found on the page that comes up)
Taped: 11/08/1999 Running Time: 0:27min.
http://www.cuny.tv/audiovideo/action.lasso?-database=CUNYPROG&-response=detail2.lasso&-table=webprogdetail2&-sortField=TapeDate&-sortOrder=descending&-sortField=SeriesTitle&-sortOrder=ascending&-sortField=Title&-sortOrder=ascending&-logicalOperator=OR&-op=bw&SeriesTitle=lothar&-op=bw&Title=lothar&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=2&-search

[spirited irish]

” Many folks operate on acceptance from group think and are not strong enough spiritually to operate alone when needed”

Spirited: Recall the ancient Hebrews crying out for a king because they feared being ‘different from the herd.’

[spirited irish]

“This ‘consensus process’ will not work on those with true faith....Catholic or our Protestant Brothers and Sisters...”

Spirited: AMEN!

[mdmathis6]

“the kingdoms of this world, have become the kingdoms of our Lord and of his Christ!!!”

[Disambiguator]

This is the Delphi Technique.

[mdmathis6]

Obama dictatorship would be bad...but I fear the rise of a Juius Caesar type after that!

[glide625]

That’s quite true; but...........there aren’t very many in touch with true faith.

[Altura Ct.]

Good post.

The problem too is that this attack has been both from without AND within. Modern Christianity has largely become a bunch of feel good, pablum filled, Marxist doctrine.

[MrB]

That to which you refer is NOT Christianity,
no matter what the adherents to it claim.

It is the “whore of Babylon”, the apostate church.

[ETL]

Note that Liberation Theologists support evolutionism over creation in our schools.

Liberation Theology is not even close to being a legitimate religion. It was concocted by communists to advance their agenda via the church.

Excerpt from The American Thinker
Article: Obama, Black Liberation Theology, and Karl Marx
May 28, 2008

Just one nugget from the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Instruction on Certain Aspects of the ‘Theology of Liberation': "...it would be illusory and dangerous to ignore the intimate bond which radically unites them (liberation theologies), and to accept elements of the marxist analysis without recognizing its connections with the (Marxist) ideology, or to enter into the practice of the class-struggle and of its marxist interpretation while failing to see the kind of totalitarian society to which this process slowly leads."
--Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, Prefect, now Pope Benedict XVI; written in 1984

Understanding that black liberation theology is Marxism dressed up to look like Christianity helps explain why there is no conflict between Cone's "Christianity" [i.e. 'reverend Wright's thing] and Farrakhan's "Nation of Islam." They are two prophets in the same philosophical (Marxist) pod, merely using different religions as backdrops for their black-power aims.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/05/obama_black_liberation_theolog.html

[Hank Kerchief]

This is a good article, but there is a mistake here, that is an important one.

Can a Jew not hold and live by the principles this country was founded on? How about a hard working Japanese engineer, whose family was Shinto but does not himself have religion?

It’s not religion that is the basis of America’s freedom and prosperity. It is a principle held by all the founders, and in their case it derived from their religious beliefs, but it was not religion, it was that principle, that was the basis of American liberty.

The Cultural Marxists intentionally attack Christianity because Christians mostly hold and live by a principle that makes them immune to the very methods they use to put over their agenda. It is the same principle held by the founders.

From the article:

“The foundation and key strategy of the consensus process is the knowledge that all individuals have an inherent fear of being alienated from the group.”

NO. That is the Marxist’s mistake. Not all individuals fear being alienated from the group. In fact, there is class of people that this never can be true of. They are the independent individualists.

If there was one true characteristic of the founders of this country, and almost every citizen of it since that has made any true contribution to it, it is individualism—which is the uncompromising determination to do what is right even if one must defy the entire population of the world. The individualist does not change what he believes or his values or his way of life to get along with any group. He’ll get along with any group that’s going his way, but won’t change his way to go along with them.

The cultural Marxists hate individualists and individualism (that’s why they are called collectivists). Most sincere Christians are, in terms of their values and principles, uncompromising individualists. The cultural Marxists, as Antonio Gramsci clearly explained, understand it is Christian’s individualism that makes them immune to the concensus method to a new “frozen” collectivist culture (which Gramsci called hegemony), and therefor why it needs to be eliminated or neutalized. It wasn’t religion as such, but the kind of character some religion produces in its believers that the Marxists considered the enemy.

To suggest that this is all about Christianity and Christians is an insult to every freedom loving, principled, decent non-Christian, from Thomas Paine to Thomas Edison.

I admire Christians and Christianity and have written in their defense many times. Although I do not think they intend to, it is disappointing how often they go out of their way to insult those who are not Christains.

(glide625, mdmathis6—enjoyed your posts.)

Hank

[Quix]

INDEED.

[Halgr]

Ah

Whats going on that is real sneaky is that there are two huge lies floating around out there...

One is that Lucifer is a fairy tale and the other is that there is no NWO.....

The Lord of the Flies has millions of human useful idiots to do his bidding.

[glide625]

O.K......a response will take some serious thought. Lunchtime.

[spirited irish]

snip: If there was one true characteristic of the founders of this country, and almost every citizen of it since that has made any true contribution to it, it is individualism

Spirited: The definition of man as an individual person has its’ only basis in the person of Jesus Christ who walked this earth as a man. If Jesus Christ had not walked this earth as an individual and called each member of His flock by their individual names, the monism of materialist-pantheism would have reduced all men to ‘oneness’ with nature. Individualism, btw, is a perversion of the definition of man as an individual.

snip: Can a Jew not hold and live by the principles this country was founded on? How about a hard working Japanese engineer, whose family was Shinto but does not himself have religion?

Spirited: Yes, of course. That said, it is resentment of Christianity in particular that drives the destruction of this once great civilization.

Two books I recommend to you:
William J. Federer’s “Back-Fired: A Nation Born for Religious Tolerance No Longer Tolerates Religion.” As Federer makes very clear, the one religion that is no longer tolerated is the that is the worldview foundation of America-—orthodox Christianity, particularly Protestanism.

Rabbi Daniel Lapin’s “America’s Real War,” in which he reveals that it is powerful Christianity-resenting atheistic-Jews behind so very much of this nation’s troubles. For writing this book, Lapin’s life has been threatened.

[spirited irish]

For all lurkers of this thread who have no idea what the Delphi Technique is, this would be an excellent time for you to ‘teach’ them, so to speak.

[IronJack]

A key thing to remember is that, in creating a dialectical anthithesis, the Left is NOT the champion of the group it chooses to carry the banner. The Left is NOT the champion of homosexuals. Or women. Or blacks. Or muslimes. Or any of its other useful tools. Its goal is not to advance one cause at the expense of the other, but to create conflict, to cause dissension. It doesn’t matter which group (thesis or antithesis) “wins” as long as the existing order is overthrown. The classic example is post-modernism, where “Whatever is is wrong.”

So simply fighting the Left is not enough; in fact, that plays directly into their scheme. We must dedicate ourselves to the complete eradication of socialist ideas and the assurance that they can never again be offered as “solutions” to problems that are wholly fictitious to begin with (the health care “crisis” comes immediately to mind).

[ArrogantBustard]

What are neo-marxists going to do -station police outside churches to prevent us from entering?

What makes you think they wouldn't? It has already been done. Ask Edmund Campion ... that sort of malfeasance was going on before Marx was conceived.

[Tolsti2]

Yep, it's ‘divide and conquer’ taken to the extreme. The only way to win is not to play.