Posted on 03/19/2010 8:13:27 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan
lol....Well, now there’s an idea....that I don’t think I’ll try. I have the pleasure of having family members with these bumper stickers. :-(
You make me proud.
You’d expect no different in PA. They’re just repeating what they’ve heard from teachers, the MSM, etc.
Great words from the MajaRushie...’they don’t have the votes.’
Praying (as an actual Catholic) for a huge turnout of Patriots this weekend...and a low turnout for Barky’s meet and greet on Saturday (maybe traffic jams and the movers and shakers can’t get there...)
hehehehehehe
The decision by SCOTUS quashed everything and allowed Katherine Harris to certify Bush the winner; Gore had no legal recourse and conceded. Please post articles proving your positions.
Well putting it that way wasn’t necessary but yes...those areas are an affront to God Almighty.
the US supremes verified the fla lower courts and the fla supremes had no way to go...the US Supremes ONLY verified fla law
your opinion....my opinion..yes just that way
I completely understand, and I am concerned for some of us (we don’t need to waste our time and money getting out of jail). Personally, I try to maintain my composure and keep my temper in check. I had a lot of problems with a short temper in my youth and have made a concentrated effort to keep under control for several decades (for the health and well-being of both my family and myself!). But I have to say, since the election, it is getting harder and harder for me to stay under control. I don’t know how long it will continue to help, but I have been playing this old saying (someone said it originally came from the Romans?) over and over in my mind: “Don’t let the b@st@rds get you down.”
Unfortunately, I do ... but the overwhelming majority oppose Obamacare. Obamacare isn’t about Healthcare. It’s a hostile takeover.
“Hostile takeover” is what I’ve been calling it for years. I even saw some DUmmies agree once.
But that isn’t the way you framed your argument. But I’m open if you can point me to a direct source. SCOTUS held that the SCOF was in violation. It ended with the SCOTUS.
I doubt that he is a fan (of something so AMERICAN in nature). His stylers and handlers probably told him to appear to be a "sports fan" just to appeal to impressionable elements of the populace. There is absolutely NOTHING that I believe about that skunk other than the fact that he is EVIL.
The Supreme Court held that: (1) manual recounts ordered by Florida Supreme Court, without specific standards to implement its order to discern “intent of the voter,” did not satisfy minimum requirement for non- arbitrary treatment of voters necessary, under Equal Protection Clause, to secure fundamental right to vote for President, and (2) remand of case to Florida Supreme Court for it to order constitutionally proper contest would not be appropriate remedy.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Pursuant to this Court’s Rule 45.2, the Clerk is directed to issue the mandate in this case forthwith.
It is so ordered.
http://law.gsu.edu/ccunningham/fall03/BushVGore-Edited.htm
This vacated the Fla Supreme’s decision (though the SCOTUS left them an out if they could do it in the time remaining ) Since their reveral of Sauls was reversed, it left Sauls’ denial as the final say in the Florida election question.
I know. It’s a very tough level of frustration to get around and stay focused.
That saying you metioned- the way I learned it:
“Illegitimus non carborundum” :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.