Posted on 05/24/2010 5:58:06 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
Canandaigua, N.Y. - A Canandaigua City School District teacher accused of having an inappropriate relationship with students has been arrested.
Marla Gurecki-Haskins, 36, is charged with official misconduct and two counts endangering welfare of a child. She's also charged with disemminating indecent material to a minor, a felony.
According to court paperwork, she's accused of "engaging in text messaging of a sexual nature that encouraged a sexual relationship between the defendant and two 16 year old male students."
She's also accused of performing oral sex on a 17-year-old male student in her classroom during school hours.
Gurecki-Haskins was arraigned on the charges this morning. She pleaded not guilty and was released on her own recognizance.
She has been a certified special education teacher since 1996.
Police say their investigation is not over. They said they have 2,400 to 2,500 pages of material, most of it emails and text messages.
“I dunno where they are. Perhaps they are wondering why schmucks are celebrating a teacher having sex with her students.”
Yea - I think that most of them can distinguish between a good-looking babe hitting on a high school boy, versus other combinations of contact.
To top it off she probably voted for nobama!
“Yea - I think that most of them can distinguish between a good-looking babe hitting on a high school boy, v”
Ya wouldn’t know it from the threads here. And truly does it make a difference? Do you really think its a good idea for teachers to be preying on our kids in school?
“Ya wouldnt know it from the threads here. And truly does it make a difference? Do you really think its a good idea for teachers to be preying on our kids in school?”
Considering that one of my kids is that age (but, needless to say, he doesn’t EVER get to step foot in a public school)...I would have to agree with you. Even so - we do enjoy the sport of judging these animals.
NOT GUILTY!! She’s a hottie.
How come this stuff never happened when I was in school? It ain’t fair I tell ya.
Well this is the Finger Lakes we are talking about, where every town is within an hour of Ithaca, the city of evil. I know, I was born there. LOL
In fact, on the hood of my car, Wisconsin and M Streets, 5 o'clock on Friday afternoon and I'll give you 30 mins to draw a crowd...
Why? She's nuts!
Day-ummmm.
Give me a shiny apple and put me on the short bus...I'm gonna get a snarlin' from Ms Marla!
I will withhold my verdict until oral arguments are finished.
Those must have been some lucky guys......
upstate ny bump
Wow...a googlewhack.
I thought a googlewhack meant a solitary hit on a search?
Situation: Male teacher seduces female student = rapist, pedophile, sex offender.
Conclusion: Teacher is completely to blame. He ought to have known better, she couldnt possibly have been complicate due to her youth and naivety.
Consequences: Tar and feather him, skin him alive and throw him in a vat of brine, emasculate him with a dull knife, and throw him in jail in general pop. and make sure all the other inmates know why hes there. Top with burn alive in hell for eternity.
********************************************************
Situation: Male Teacher seduces male student= rapist, pedophile, sex offender.
Conclusion: Teacher completely to blame (no argument there)
Consequences: Skin it alive with a dull knife, THEN tar and feather it with hotter tar and more feathers. Emasculate with rusty razor blade. Then throw into vat of hot brine and put in prison with general pop with sign over cell door listing charges. Have it thrown into the lake of fire along with Satan and the False Prophet.
*********************************************************
Situation: Female teacher seduces female student= pedophile & sex offender.
Conclusion: See above male teacher seduces male student
Consequences: See above male teacher seduces male student, unless both females are attractive.
*********************************************************
Situation: Female teacher seduces male student.
Conclusion: *Lucky* boy, *wink, wink, nudge, nudge*, gets every boys dream. Teacher bears some blame for actions, but boy is more than willing to comply so no harm done, because, after all, he IS a boy and everyone knows that situations like that never damage a boys psyche or future relationships like it does girls.
Consequences: Decide guilt or innocence based solely on looks of teacher and be generous in pardon. If she is hot, declare *not guilty* and look the other way. If she isnt, prison time for a while, maybe. Dont forget to vote if you would hit it or not.
You’re right, I’m wrong. What’s the term for a null search?
But, in all seriousness, this seems a little overblown. These were not small children but 16 and 17 year old young men. Unless they were suffering from a mental disability that impeded their ability to consent, how can anyone say (especially in a society as sexualized as ours) that they are ‘victims’ of getting to have relations with a very attractive older woman?
Not sure, but coincidentally, “what’s the term for a null search” returns “no results found”....
Kristen Wiig's (of Saturday Night Live) sister?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.