I'm going with not guilty.
Seriously, is there not a college or university around where these teachers can blow all of the students they want without the risk of any jail time?
Eff All - I had a serious post ready to go before I got ‘sucked’ into this one and now I can’t remember what the hell I was doing. Ah well, better thoughts anyways.
My Lord that looks like Katherine Harris.
So that's what they mean by "special education". I didn't know you had to be certified to have sex with students.
Now that’s what I call SPECIAL education.
I'll bet it's that stupid Principal that squealed!
NOT GUILTY!! She’s a hottie.
In fact, on the hood of my car, Wisconsin and M Streets, 5 o'clock on Friday afternoon and I'll give you 30 mins to draw a crowd...
I will withhold my verdict until oral arguments are finished.
Wow...a googlewhack.
Situation: Male teacher seduces female student = rapist, pedophile, sex offender.
Conclusion: Teacher is completely to blame. He ought to have known better, she couldnt possibly have been complicate due to her youth and naivety.
Consequences: Tar and feather him, skin him alive and throw him in a vat of brine, emasculate him with a dull knife, and throw him in jail in general pop. and make sure all the other inmates know why hes there. Top with burn alive in hell for eternity.
********************************************************
Situation: Male Teacher seduces male student= rapist, pedophile, sex offender.
Conclusion: Teacher completely to blame (no argument there)
Consequences: Skin it alive with a dull knife, THEN tar and feather it with hotter tar and more feathers. Emasculate with rusty razor blade. Then throw into vat of hot brine and put in prison with general pop with sign over cell door listing charges. Have it thrown into the lake of fire along with Satan and the False Prophet.
*********************************************************
Situation: Female teacher seduces female student= pedophile & sex offender.
Conclusion: See above male teacher seduces male student
Consequences: See above male teacher seduces male student, unless both females are attractive.
*********************************************************
Situation: Female teacher seduces male student.
Conclusion: *Lucky* boy, *wink, wink, nudge, nudge*, gets every boys dream. Teacher bears some blame for actions, but boy is more than willing to comply so no harm done, because, after all, he IS a boy and everyone knows that situations like that never damage a boys psyche or future relationships like it does girls.
Consequences: Decide guilt or innocence based solely on looks of teacher and be generous in pardon. If she is hot, declare *not guilty* and look the other way. If she isnt, prison time for a while, maybe. Dont forget to vote if you would hit it or not.
Kristen Wiig's (of Saturday Night Live) sister?
“Marla” = “Mark” in drag?
I can see where she could suit up for multiple play.
“She pleaded not guilty and was released on her own recognizance.”
Teacher has been released on many times, but not enough for her liking.
By the looks of that grin I believe she may still be withholding crucial evidence.
I doubt that it’s occurred to anyone, but this may just be part of a new liberal program designed to discourage young males from skipping school.
These selfless warriors of education are doing all of this for the children.
Hit tip to Pelosi, Reid and Obama for coming up with such a comprehensive, yet fiscally responsible and innovative education policy.
I do hope she gets extra union benefits.