Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Myths, Legends, & Misconceptions of the Wolf
ChicoER Gate ^ | 8/21/10 | T. R. Mader

Posted on 08/21/2010 12:08:13 PM PDT by Tom Hawks

Hosted by imgur.com

I and others have written extensively about the wolf reintroduction program and the destruction it has caused since the first 60 were released into Yellowstone Park and Idaho in 1995. What we are attempting to do with these articles is to wake up as many people as possible about the danger the left has put Americans in.

There is a Wolf Cult in America that has convinced many Americans that it would be a good thing to have wild wolves as neighbors in our local parks. Well I for one, and many like me, do not wish to be confronted by a wolf when we decide to go fishing or camping. Especially since the wolves that are being introduced into our parks, like to roam in packs. So if you see one you can bet the farm there are more lurking around near by.

Gate was given permission to post, in whole, an article written by T. R. Mader, the Research Director of AWS which is an independent research organization. Mader has researched wolf history for more than 15 years before he wrote this article. He has since traveled extensively as he continues conducting research and interviews on environmental issues.

Mader wrote this article at the height of furor over the wolf re-introduction program in 1995 & 96. It's my hope that by posting this, many of you will have a better understanding of the anger many ranchers, farmers, hunters, and even regular small town city folk have with a program that has proved to be everything those against the program warned about some 15 years ago.

Due to the length of the article, it has been divided into three parts, and instead of creating three separate posts on FR, I have created three links below for you to follow if you so desire to read the article, "Myths, Legends, & Misconceptions of the Wolf".

Part 1- Misconceptions 1 to 6
   
Part 2 - Misconceptions 7 to 12
  
Part 3 - Conclusion & Bibliography

(Excerpt) Read more at ChicoER/Gate ....


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: depredation; hunting; wildlife; wolves
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: muawiyah

***we need animals who can kill lots of deer.***

That would be me!


21 posted on 08/21/2010 12:50:33 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (AKA Rodrigo de Bivar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tom Hawks
"You sound like a leftist"

It seems this way only because you make a leap of faith, a logical fallacy, in your thinking:

"The only thin in danger of going extinct is every Americans RIGHT to go into the woods"

Nobody has deprived you of that right. What you insist is that you should be able to go to the woods in complete safety. What's next? Should we pay for some people to escort you there and kill mosquitoes around you, lest you may be bitten and infected with lime decease? Should we remove trees with protruding branches so that your Highness will not trip and brake his leg?

You are free to go to the woods. Do so at YOUR own risk.

"People following you and because idiots like you"

So, who does sound like a leftist? Mere disagreement with your point of view results in name-calling. No questions, no discussion. Even some of my liberal friends are more inquisitive and tolerant to ideas.

I don't take any offense: people who so hastily and without reason call resort to name-calling only underscore their own ignorance and the inability to think. The logical fallacy in your statement is shown above.

I shall not reply to you fuhrer. In view of your rudeness, you have not deserved even this one.

Good hunting!

22 posted on 08/21/2010 12:50:40 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tom Hawks

deer kill people too - a lot

http://money.cnn.com/2005/11/04/news/newsmakers/deer/

http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2007/09/28/064540.html


23 posted on 08/21/2010 12:52:52 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (g)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tom Hawks

Since the wolf has been reintroduced to Yellowstone the ecology has gone back to what it used to be. If there wasn’t a purpose for wolves do you suppose they’d exist? I think enough animals become extinct without the help of man. If the wolves survive and thrive the world must need them. And yes, I do live with lots of wildlife lurking. Mostly bears, bobcats, coyotes, snakes. They were here first. I respect them and try to stay out of their way. And I occasionally get to watch a bald eagle take a bath.


24 posted on 08/21/2010 12:56:15 PM PDT by CaraMiaR (Excuse me, I have to adjust my aluminium hat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

You sound like the Jews who trusted that Hitler would only help the State get over their economic woes, but all the other crap he said was just talk. Besides, all that talk about him hating Jews is just a bunch of scare tactics by those who don’t understand how badly the country needs someone who can fix the problem and make the trains run on time.

Let us allow the wolves into the sheep fold, they will only kill the deer. Besides, all that talk about wolves killing pets, farm animals, and little children is just a bunch scare tactics used by those who don’t understand how badly we need the wolves to fix the problem and make the deer problem go away.

Useful idiots is what Hitler and his men called people like you. By the way, are you Jewish?


25 posted on 08/21/2010 12:56:20 PM PDT by Tom Hawks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Even some of my liberal friends are more inquisitive and tolerant to ideas.

That explains your ignorance. I readily admit I have no friends who are liberal. Liberals only want to destroy my way of life and force my children to be raised in a Godless immoral society run by people like Obama.

Anyone who thinks like that is NO FRIEND OF MINE.

You live on the East coast, so your Rhinoism makes sense to you and your liberal friends, but not to me nor my conservative friends.
26 posted on 08/21/2010 1:01:39 PM PDT by Tom Hawks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

“Actually what you need to do is to open the area to archery hunting.”
When firearms are used, I know enough to hit the dirt. Is there much of an issue w/those “to whom it may concern” arrows?


27 posted on 08/21/2010 1:01:46 PM PDT by Silentgypsy (Employing freedom of speech/expression in order to condemn freedom of speech/expression—go figure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tom Hawks; muawiyah; All
Golll -eee, Tom -

That's one whale of a big rubber band - to stretch it out to equate anyone who disagrees with you on the wolf question as akin to Jews in Nazi Germany -

I'd say your deep seated and despicable prejudges are showing.

At the very least, such attacks as you use to bolster your side of an argument illustrates only your inability to have a civilized discussion - thus rendering anything you have to say further - moot.

But you have my sympathies: Wherever you go, there you are.

28 posted on 08/21/2010 1:05:39 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (g)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CaraMiaR

“Wolves were transplanted to Yellowstone and central Idaho on the following dates in 1995: January 11, 12, 19, 21. The first livestock killed was January 29, 1995 near Salmon, Idaho.”

That’s eight days after the last transplant. Just 15 years later we have wolves killing livestock in Eastern Oregon.

Wolves prefer livestock to game because domesticated animals are slow and stupid compared to game making them a cheap and easy dinner date.

Reintroduction was a leftist fool’s dream that is being paid for by farmers and ranchers. Just another one of the many ways they pick our pockets so they can live in their utopia.


29 posted on 08/21/2010 1:09:22 PM PDT by Valpal1 ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tom Hawks
TQ: "Even some of my liberal friends are more inquisitive and tolerant to ideas."

TH: "That explains your ignorance. I readily admit I have no friends who are liberal."

Ignorance? Why don't you demonstrate what was ignorant in my post? You are even lower than previously revealed.

Once again, nothing about the ideas that you yourself put on the table, not even an attempt to address what I said. This is, of course, only because you have nothing to say. It's easy to win over dumb fish, but when it comes to thinking --- just can't do it, can you?

Some people are intolerant and see the world in black and white only because they are young. You, however, will never grow out of that, sadly.

You have considerable fascist and Marxist streaks in your worldview. It was Marx's idea that a person's station in life determines his thinking. And so you too claim that my living on the East Coast determines my thinking.

It's funny to hear a Marxist calling a conservative a RINO. Once again, I take no offense, just laugh.

It's because of "conservatives" like you that we have a communist in the White House. Enjoy.

30 posted on 08/21/2010 1:14:59 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
I'd say your deep seated and despicable prejudges are showing.

I only say in such a way because I have close friends who have lost hunting dogs, pets, and one friend in Montana even had his son chased down by a three wolves. Thank God his father believes in SSS or two of those wolves would still be running free to wreck havoc.

When I hear Easterners who claim to be conservative, tell me I need to live with the danger, yet he won't even agree that shooting the damn deer in his area is a smart thing to do, I start wondering who he votes for and maybe he just ain't as conservative as he claims to be, or at least he ain't as conservative as me and my Texas neighbors.

I also wonder how people who think like that feel about Arizona's law for illegals. There is a big divide in this country that separates those of us conservatives out West and those who claim to be conservative back East.

Call me an extremist all you want and tell me I am out of line, but it's damn time more conservatives start holding other conservatives toes to the fire, or Obama will be around for 6 more years.
31 posted on 08/21/2010 1:17:10 PM PDT by Tom Hawks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

What’s going on is that people in your area have quit hunting and eating them. Deer aren’t outbreeding their predators, their predators (man) got rich and fat and lazy and quit hunting in favor of McDonalds.

If economic times get desperate enough, you might be glad of that abundance.


32 posted on 08/21/2010 1:17:31 PM PDT by Valpal1 ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Just put out a lot more licenses for deer and forget the wolves because your dogs and cats and children wouldn’t be safe.


33 posted on 08/21/2010 1:19:25 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Most people aren’t aware that wolves are being released on the east coast. But they are not the larger grey wolves, they are red wolves that are somewhat smaller and more coyote like. There are at least several hundred of them in the eastern marshy woods of North Carolina. They are very beautiful, fast, and can hunt smaller game including small deer. Whether their population will stabilize, or start spreading out like coyotes is anyones guess.


34 posted on 08/21/2010 1:19:41 PM PDT by Funee Kat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
No, this is an urban area ~ very urban. The hunting laws don't need to be liberalized at all ~ we need animals who can kill lots of deer.

Not wolves - they'll hunt the pets, then the kids, then you. And they can't be controlled.

35 posted on 08/21/2010 1:21:44 PM PDT by SCalGal (Friends don't let friends donate to H$U$ or PETA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Silentgypsy
Pretty doubtful. An arrow has a much shorter range than a high velocity bullet and these hunts were done by well trained hunters.

http://www.post-gazette.com/neigh_north/20021030nindiana1030p4.asp

36 posted on 08/21/2010 1:23:57 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tom Hawks

Really? Calling people “jews” and referring to them as “like the jews that trusted hitler”? Really? What kind of small brained child are you? Just because someone does not agree with you, does not give you the right to be shmuck. I bet you think Wolves only kill the weak or the sick animals! I know more about Wolves North America than ever will, and you sound like a 4th grader repeating PETA brochure bullet points.


37 posted on 08/21/2010 1:25:02 PM PDT by 999replies (Thune/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
But coyotes aren't big enough to take down a bunch of deer and won't work in groups.

Ours are. We have Coyotes that are the size of large dogs. I've seen some that I thought were red Huskies but they were large Coyotes. I'm guessing they weigh 50lbs or more. I have two part Yellow Mountain Curs that weigh 60lbs and the Coyotes appear to be as big as the Curs are. Ours also hunt in packs and make a terrible racket when they are hunting. So far they have never attacked a human but they don't seem to be afraid either. A lot of the Eastern Coyotes are very large and hunt in packs like wolves. I know they do because I've seen them.

38 posted on 08/21/2010 1:25:43 PM PDT by Melinda in TN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I suggested zap collars. The wolf goes the wrong way, or decides to eat doggies instead of deer, s/he gets zapped.

Those are a training device and can't be worn continually - if worn continually, the posts wear holes/sores in the animals' necks (infection) and the nylon collar becomes enbedded in a growing animal's neck. Horrible mess. Plus they are battery operated and the batteries would need replacing.

AND - They don't shock hard enough to do more to an animal of that size with that kind of coat than to just piss them off.....

39 posted on 08/21/2010 1:27:43 PM PDT by SCalGal (Friends don't let friends donate to H$U$ or PETA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CaraMiaR
Since the wolf has been reintroduced to Yellowstone the ecology has gone back to what it used to be

Where do you get your Yellowstone news from, the Green Channel?

40 posted on 08/21/2010 1:28:55 PM PDT by 999replies (Thune/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson