Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's New 'Gay' Force
Townhall ^ | December 19, 2010 | Kevin McCullough

Posted on 12/18/2010 10:33:06 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

With the passage of the law to repeal the Clinton-era legislation commonly referred to as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," President Obama enters into a new reality. In one last blaze of defiance of the American people, and expressly those who serve in our nation's armed forces, President Obama was able to shove social engineering into pretty much the very corner of American culture where we have no business doing so.

Upon his signature President Obama will begin a process that will at the very least disrupt operations, and at the very worst see the eventual weakening of our armed forces.

Throughout the entirety of this debate I've had questions, none of which seemed to be answered or even asked in the congressional sessions dealing with the matter.

From a purely pragmatic standpoint perhaps someone could answer them now, since I'm especially sure that President Obama wouldn't push for such a fundamental transformation of our military without good answers to them.

1. What happens to housing, on base and in theater?

If it is morally questionable to have men and women housed together because of the sexual tension that exists between primarily men who would be predatorily interested in the women they might shower with or frequently be seen in the act of dressing and undressing on a regular basis, why is it any different if you have identified the predatory homosexual male who might have an unrequited "thing" for a fellow service member? If it is proper to keep men and women housed separately do we now go to four sets of housing. Men who don't engage in homosexual activity, Men who do, Women who don't, Women who do? Practically speaking Mr. President how do you get past the fundamental sexual tension that will be present the minute some make it known?

2. Do you expect the military system or the civilian courts to deal with the influx of phony sexual harassment cases to follow?

Consider this issue a prediction of sorts, but take it to the bank that those who engage in open homosexuality will feel the freedom if not the need begin to portray themselves as victims of harassment pretty much anytime something doesn't go their way. And it may not require anything all that severe to trigger it. A drill instructor gets a little too rough in his language while trying to beat the "sissy" out of a recruit in basic training or Officer Candidate School and the backlog will commence.

3. Will base commanders be required to host "pride" events that allow for similar conduct to the x-rated displays that go on in the nation's cities each year?

There was much discussion in the Senate and House hearings about the issue of morale, the breakdown of structure, the significance of discipline and the ability to command respect and a readied force. Nothing related to any "pride" event ever held comes close to anything resembling respect, discipline, or structure. There is a reason our best volunteer to serve their nation, and it has nothing to do with speedos, bump or grind.

4. Will all other sexual conduct be made legal as well?

It is still a crime to commit adultery in active military duty, and even more so for officers. How can you possibly be allowing for the flamboyancy of effeminate male soldiers to engage in sexual conduct and their notorious ever wandering lust for the new on one hand, and hold court martial for those who have discreetly hidden their sexual escapades while destroying their families?

There are many legitimate reasons why the military is not the place to run experiments on the restructuring of the society at large.

For the leftist idiots who will scream the meme that, "every other nation on the planet already does it," shut up!

None of those military forces are the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marines.

I know the progressive elites in the nation awake this morning feeling better about what has been done to the U.S. Military in this vote. I know this President has never served and likely barely knows anyone who has. I know that the godless in our nation think this is all a tremendous step forward.

In the hundreds of conversations I've had with those that serve in our nation's armed forces, from Naval F-18 aviators to Army Rangers, Marine specialists to Air Force pilots of B2 stealth bombers, C130s, and military drones, the view of the military is clear. They serve to focus on the mission at hand, not because they may or may not display pictures of their romantic interests in the living quarters.

I know that our military has been the best in the world, and that they deserved to be listened to when they spoke clearly from the four branches to the President. The head of each branch clearly made the case for not allowing the military to become a place where the focus of our troops was placed on when and how they can have sex, instead of achieving their mission.

But now that reality has been thrust upon us. It is a focus of magnificent distraction, and in terms of operational priorities it is of miniscule importance.

It was President Obama's doing, and the results that follow will be laid at his feet.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; congress; dadt; democrats; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; military; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 last
To: devistate one four

Single mom as in “never married”.


181 posted on 12/20/2010 2:52:22 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Question… Does this mean Obama, after apologizing and bowing to the world, striving to make friends with the enemy will now have to sign off allowing UCMJ sodomy rule change (sticking a male penis into another man’s butt) as being ‘acceptable/normal’?

All that friendship gesturing will then be for not, they will hate him more for it.


182 posted on 12/20/2010 4:27:46 AM PST by Java4Jay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush
Westboro Baptist’s protests have an ulterior motive if they are indeed a leftist front group.

I see them more as an anti-Christian front group as opposed to a leftist front group. Nearly everything they do goes against the teachings of Jesus, and most people who have even a cursory working knowledge of those teachings (sadly, that number is far too low) can see right through their tactics.

I believe the WBC's targets are not gays per se, but rather people who are considering Christianity, or people who identify as Christians but who are not particularly religious. Their preaching of these lies about Christ will have a terrible effect on people who know of Jesus, but who do not know Jesus. Their preaching also plays right into the hands of people who are opposed to Christianity. These activities give such people a free "Christians are haters" card to play against the faithful.

183 posted on 12/20/2010 6:18:38 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Obama does not give a rats petard about anyone but himself so he is politically doing this last minute TO GET VOTES and appeal to his base.


184 posted on 12/20/2010 9:26:18 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jumper
Maybe the Heritate Foundation or WorldNetDaily will fill a Freedom of Information Request to get the Fiscal Data on what this is costing the Department of State, and to determine if it is an unfunded obligation.... And then maybe someone will be fined or forced to repay the government for this run-a-muck policy.

They might be working the issue right now for all we know. As well. Glenn Beck's group may be working it. One thing is for sure regarding finding corruption with this administration -it is a target rich environment. One does not have to dig deep to uncover malfeasance; in fact, one does not have to dig at all -it is stacked high and wide...

185 posted on 12/20/2010 9:55:42 AM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

Common whore that is, that is the truth.

Sometimes it hurts.


186 posted on 12/20/2010 10:44:23 AM PST by devistate one four ( jihad is a 2 way street! Kimber CDP II .45 OOHRAH! TET68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: devolve
'Barry, are you sure that yellow doesn't make my butt look big?'

No Honey! However, the Secret Service said that you must go infront of me, not beside me.

187 posted on 12/20/2010 5:01:43 PM PST by Grampa Dave (ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson