1 posted on
01/14/2011 11:20:32 AM PST by
pickrell
To: pickrell
So does this mean that next tax year since we will be under-withheld?
2 posted on
01/14/2011 11:25:09 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
To: pickrell
Just noticed that in my paycheck yesterday. I’ll take it, but it was a bit of a surprise.
Colonel, USAFR
3 posted on
01/14/2011 11:27:12 AM PST by
jagusafr
("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
To: pickrell
A shame there will be no push to ‘save’ that 2% for investment toward retirement. Educational opportunity wasted on the already ignorant.
5 posted on
01/14/2011 11:38:00 AM PST by
pacpam
(action=consequence and applies in all cases - friend of victory)
To: pickrell
Your article is a bit "dramaqueenish" and takes too long to get to the point. Of course, any real taxpayer knows what happens with their SS contributions - they go to the current oldsters' monthly payments, and the excess funds the oldsters' monthly payments.
While most people see this 1/3 cut as more money, it doesn't make a damned bit of difference to people making over the max withholding; it'll just take a little while longer to make that freedom point. What this really is, is a tax cut for middle and lower income people who will never reach that withholding maximum. It isn't rocket science.
6 posted on
01/14/2011 11:42:28 AM PST by
Gaffer
To: pickrell; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; NFHale; ..
Yep, not only did they spend part of our SS/FICA payroll taxes for decades; but after raising hell about Bush trying to bankrupt SS by allowing us to put some of the FICA money in a retirement savings account, Obama and Democrats happily passed a bill that allows us to put some of our FICA money in our pockets, bank accounts or...
retirement saving accounts; The only difference is this FICA tax cut bill is supposedly temporary.
The progressives/liberals over at MSNBC have been complaining about that progressive FICA tax cut because they were very happy claiming SS is fully funded for decades (the CBO spreads this crap ) and a great success, and now no-one will believe that anymore.
7 posted on
01/14/2011 11:45:40 AM PST by
sickoflibs
("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
To: pickrell
The 2% reduction in the employee’s SS tax rate will expire at the end of the year.
NOW is the time for a conservative in Congress to propose that when the 2% comes back, it does not go into the so-called “lock box”, but rather is invested in an individual account in the employee’s name that he can’t touch until he is eligible to draw Social Security.
13 posted on
01/14/2011 1:33:33 PM PST by
So Cal Rocket
(Task 1: Accomplished, Task 2: Hold them Accountable!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson