Posted on 05/03/2011 7:01:22 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The following comments were made in a public speech last week by a man considering running for president of the United States.
On gas prices: “We have nobody in Washington that sits back and says, ‘You’re not going to raise that f***ing price.’”
On what he would say as president to China: “Listen, you mother f***ers, we’re going to tax you 25 percent.”
On Iraq: “We build a school, we build a road, they blow up the school, we build another school, we build another road, they blow them up, we build again. In the meantime we can’t get a f***ing school in Brooklyn.”
The man is Donald Trump. And the words render him unfit to be a presidential candidate, let alone president. They also evidence a need for some Republican-party soul-searching as to how a group of Republican women could laugh and cheer at such language coming from a would-be presidential candidate.
On a number of occasions I have written that the use of expletives in public discourse has been a characteristic of the Left. Public cursing is not an issue to the intellectual and artistic Left. They shrug off criticism of such language as antiquated and elitist — not to mention hypocritical, given that prominent conservatives such as Dick Cheney and George W. Bush were caught using such language.
But there is a world of difference between using an expletive in private and using one in a public speech. For those who do not see the difference, think of the difference between relieving oneself in private and relieving oneself in public. It usually takes a university education and a Leftist worldview not to see the enormous moral distinction between public and private cursing. One affects society; one does not.
I hereby plead guilty to occasionally using an expletive when angry about something particularly vile or, for that matter, in a punch line to an off-color joke — in private to my wife or to friends. Likewise, while I find the vast amount of gratuitous cursing in movies injurious to society, I do not find all such cursing offensive. The use of the F-word in a powerful private moment in the Academy Award–winning film The King’s Speech was appropriate and genuinely humorous.
In general, however, the use of such words — whether in public or as a matter of general usage in private — is degrading to the user, to the listener, and to society.
As a father, I even banned use of the word “sucks” in general conversation in my home. I am certain that the use of that word at sporting events, such as when thousands of fans scream it at an opposing player or at the entire opposing team, has contributed to — and is a sign of — the coarsening of American life. That home teams routinely use the stadium organ to goad fans into chanting the word is only further proof of this coarsening. When I was a child, stadiums allowed smoking but not cursing. Today smoking is unheard of, but cursing is ubiquitous. A visit to an athletic event may be marginally healthier for the body today. But it is can also be far more injurious to the soul.
Last week, Donald Trump may have made his one contribution to American history. His recent speech was the first of a person seeking the presidential nomination of a major party to use such language.
Had he used the F-word once and apologized, I would not have written this column. But, and this important, he used it once, and upon seeing the enthusiastic reaction, felt encouraged to use it again and again.
The audience’s reaction is even more important — and more distressing — than Trump’s use of the word. Had there been booing, or had someone who invited him arisen to ask that he not use such language, or had some of the women walked out, the good name of the Republican party and of conservative values would have been preserved. But if Republican women — and I emphasize both the party and the gender — find the use of the F-word by a potential presidential candidate amusing, America is more coarsened than I had imagined.
If we cannot count on Republicans and conservatives to maintain standards of public decency and civility, to whom shall we look?
The argument that Trump told it as it is, that he’s one guy who isn’t afraid to call a spade a spade, is nonsense. Any fool can curse in public. Just like real comedians elicit laughter without the F-word, real politicians and real leaders inspire people and tell tough truths without that word. Somehow Lincoln inspired America without cursing, and Winston Churchill would not have been more effective had he said, “F*** Germany.”
It wasn’t just the use of the word that disqualified Trump as a serious candidate for president of the United States. So did the points he was trying to make with it. For example, our gas prices are not high because America didn’t order anyone to lower them. They are high because the value of the dollar has been debased by President Obama’s monetary and fiscal policies, and because the president and the Democrats won’t allow us to drill for the oil we have in abundance on and offshore.
Leading Republicans need to announce that there is no place in the Republican party for profane public speech. You cannot stand for small government without standing for big people.
— Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host and columnist.
This is a big f ing deal
I agree... He is NOT presidential.
I’ve got my eyes on Herman Cain now.
Who gives a %$#@?
“Donald Trump’s F-Bombs. This Disqualifies Him from the Presidency. GOP should have no place for it.”
*********************************
BS!!!!!!!!!!
I take it, Donald Trump is still presidential material even if he were to relieve himself in public??
” “Donald Trump’s F-Bombs. This Disqualifies Him from the Presidency. GOP should have no place for it.”
*********************************
BS!!!!!!!!!!”
So lets apply this to all members of congress, VP, Hill & Bill
etc.
In other words clean house.
F’in’ dork.
The GOP is no place for a egoistical,narcissistic,fraud like Trump, weather he swore like a sailor or not.
Long Live President Camacho!!
I agree.
Yeah.
Let’s renominate Bob Dole!
can you just imagine the impact on international diplomacy should this jerk get elected and start throwing his weight around using the worst of profanity???
Vera Coking, and the use of eminent domain to force her out of her house disqualifies him all by itself.
I WILL NOT vote for, support, or respect anyone who does, a person who is so unhesitant to respect private property.
The man is a socialist, in the sense he’s perfectly happy to use the resources of the state to socialize his risk and enforce his schemes; he’s just more blatant than most such in enjoying his ill gotten gains.
now ya said a mouthful!
(PS: not criticizing Bob Dole, except he’s a bit too well behaved to beat the commies is all)
What America faces is a fight against communism.
No more tiddly winks please. This is quite serious.
OK, so we’ll just have a F-Bomb (A juvenile term if there ever was one) Democrat for President instead.
Darn right I can.
Perhaps America would stop being taken advantage of.
We’re sure not fixing anything by our current “surrender every job” approach.
If he was pissing on the right people......maybe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.