[hosepipe]

A easier hit could not be found than Norway..
They’ve Not experienced terrorism since WWII..
and even then “lightly”...

They are not setup for reality in the real world..
After all they are like mideastern oil barons..
Bleeding the rest of the world for funds to run their socialism..

They are not used to looking terrorism in the face..
Must be a shock to their mindset..

[EGPWS]

Don’t lose focus on the single christian right wing nut job theory. /ms

[Glenn]

When I see the word "experts", I cringe.

[Navy Patriot]

We know that the North Sea oil is winding down, and that includes Norway's share.

Libya intended to sell future oil production to China and no longer to Western Europe, and Norway participated in the Obama/NATO war for oil on Libya.

Qaddafi swore revenge for killing of Libyan civilians on NATO Europe, and he has connections all over Europe.

Russia and China have carefully sidestepped any blame, while allowing NATO to hang itself.

All VERY interesting, without solid proof, yet.

[onedoug]

Nazis and islamists homosexual brotherhood.

[DocH]

"Islamic terrorists?

Naw...

It's GOT to be RIGHT-WING extremists.

You remember it was that right-wing Christian fundamentalist white guy - Timothy McVeigh that did that bombing.

Yeah, it WAS just ONCE, and a LONG time ago, BUT..." /sarc

(lib thinking: "It's ALL we got, that McVeigh thing.")

[Elsiejay]

“Dear Joan and family,
Yes we are shocked by the bombing and shooting in and outside Oslo, all done
by the same man, a 32 year old right wing fundamentalist.”

The above is part of an e-mail rcvd this morning from a Minnesota cousin, who got it from a relative in Norway. I would not assume this to be the last word on identity of shooter/bomber.

[Publius6961]

Hey, what's going on here?

I thought the perp was a right wing Norwegian Amish?

[Always A Marine]

"A deadly bombing that killed at least seven in Oslo on Friday can be viewed as a response to Norway's participation in NATO-led military campaign against Libya, Russian top political experts said."

If true, the bombing (not the unrelated shootings) was a legitimate retaliation against a belligerent government. Without provocation, NATO has been doing the very same thing to the sovereign government of Libya. Has anyone ever adequately explained why we are so intent on turning Libya over to a disorganized bands of ragtag rebels?

Only one explanation makes sense. Libya possesses huge stocks of gold, and was on the verge of creating a Gold Dinar as the new medium of exchange for oil. For that, we are bombing Libya's government, and it wouldn't surprise me if "the West" soon resorts to a ground invasion to prevent the trading of oil with a stable, gold-based currency.