Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police arrest man for child pornography after tipoff from burglars
The Inquisitr ^

Posted on 10/06/2011 10:16:19 PM PDT by Borough Park

Two teenagers broke into a California home in order to steal a few valuables, including a stack of blank CDs. When they returned home with their loot they discovered that the CDs weren’t actually blank, they contained Kraig Stockard’s child pornography collection. The two robbers decided to turn themselves in to police in order to turn over the collection.

The Huffington Post reports that the Merced County Sheriff’s Department decided not to arrest the two burglars. They did, however, decide to raid Stockard’s home.

The police seized several computers, laptops and other hardware, but they did not say if they found any more contraband. Regardless, the police still had plenty of evidence on the stolen disks to arrest Stockard. According to a statement from police, 30 of the 50 stolen disks contained child pornography. The Sheriff’s Department said that thousands of photos and videos were found on the disks.

Stockard was booked on possession of child pornography, but Fox 40 reports that he has already posted his $25000 bail.

My Fox 40 reports that although the police did not press charges against the two thieves, the two teenagers aren’t completely off the hook. Their case has been turned over to the Merced County District Attorney’s Office for review.

Deputy Tom McKenzie said:

“We did not actually go out and arrest the suspects for the burglary. They were obviously the lesser of two evils.”

Should the two robbers, a minor and a 19-year-old, be punished for stealing? Or should their misdeeds be over looked because they uncovered a greater evil?

(Excerpt) Read more at inquisitr.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: childpornography; moralabsolutes; pedophile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2011 10:16:24 PM PDT by Borough Park
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Borough Park

The Lord works in mysterious ways.

[so...can we hang him, now?]


2 posted on 10/06/2011 10:20:21 PM PDT by Salamander (Alice Cooper hit me with a stick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borough Park

A good defense attorney will have a field day with this one. Easy money.


3 posted on 10/06/2011 10:20:44 PM PDT by doc1019 (You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah

ping.


4 posted on 10/06/2011 10:21:37 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

Placemark for tomorrow pingout!


5 posted on 10/06/2011 10:24:16 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Borough Park

It takes a lot of guts to turn yourself in for a crime,kudos to these punks for doing the right thing after doing a wrong.


6 posted on 10/06/2011 10:26:03 PM PDT by Cutterjohnmhb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borough Park

How do they know that the CDs were actually owned by the guy? Couldn’t anyone say, hey, I was robbing my neighbor’s and look what I found.


7 posted on 10/06/2011 10:26:17 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Not really. The burglars are not state actors. The porn guy is toast.


8 posted on 10/06/2011 10:27:25 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Borough Park

One day, what we all do in secret will be revealed to all. This guy, just a little sooner, he he.


9 posted on 10/06/2011 10:29:16 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (http://www.durban3nyc.com/. Go there and learn what those who seek to destroy Israel are up to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garjog

The guy will probably be charged for what was found pursuant to the warrant, rather than what the burglars brought in.


10 posted on 10/06/2011 10:29:23 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Does seem like a matter of “illegal search and seizure.” Gonna be interesting to see how this plays out. My guess...he pleads guilty in exchange for a sentence of “counseling.”


11 posted on 10/06/2011 10:31:05 PM PDT by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144; doc1019

Yep. He is toast. They were not acting as government agents so any evidence they turned over that led to the search warrant on the computers in his possession is admissible.

Even criminals have their own morality and ethics.


12 posted on 10/06/2011 10:31:11 PM PDT by volunbeer (Keep the dope, we'll make the change in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
A good defense attorney will have a field day with this one. Easy money.

How so? Would an attorney be able to challenge the evidence on a "chain of custody" basis?

13 posted on 10/06/2011 10:31:25 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Although I think this POS, should be prosecuted, any good defense attorney could punch many holes in this one.

They raided this home on the results of a home burglary? And dropped the charges on the buglers.

How do they know that the files collected came from the defendant? They could have been part of the burgers home stash, etc, etc.


14 posted on 10/06/2011 10:40:21 PM PDT by doc1019 (You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Borough Park
No independent evidence, no conviction! Independent being, of course, evidence not connected to the "burglars", i.e., not submitted by them nor possibly planted by them. Any evidence of conflict between the defendant and the "burglars" should be considered exculpatory.

And even if a conviction is obtained consistent with the above, an appeals court would toss it if it were shown that the "burglars" were put up to it by the police. Which would be a good thing, since we don't want the police motivated to pursue this sort of fishing expedition!

Oh, and their names, please?

15 posted on 10/06/2011 10:44:26 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borough Park

I am beginning to notice in the past few arrests of this type that perverts collecting child pornography have THOUSANDS of photos videos etc. 30 CDs full of child porn. Normal humans would be revolted by a single photo of a sexually abused child but these pervs build massive collections to the point I can only conclude that behind their vacuous eyes, they are dead inside and are mere walking encyclopedias of kiddie porn and evil. Talk about soul rot.


16 posted on 10/06/2011 10:44:57 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Warrants are sworn out on reliable information. Someone turning themselves in for one crime in order to report a more serious one is pretty reliable, especially when they bring tangible evidence of the greater crime.

This is NOT evidence which the State has seized illegally. It has been dropped into their laps by private individuals.

The only way this guy gets off is if there is nothing incriminating in the materials seized at his home pursuant to the warrant. If the only evidence is what the two burglars brought in, he does have a case that no one can establish these materials were in his possession.


17 posted on 10/06/2011 10:54:49 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Poisoned tree.


18 posted on 10/06/2011 10:55:12 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-eyed killer of the deep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: garjog

Yep, I can tell you’re a college “perfesser” alright, by the punctuation and questionable ethics! I say the young perps should be commended for doing the right thing, even though it exposes their own crimes. They can negotiate a plea deal and become model citizens for the future.

JC


19 posted on 10/06/2011 10:56:56 PM PDT by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Escalation.

Much of the thrill is that the activity is forbidden fruit. The very fact that it is illicit is part of the thrill. As that thrill wanes, it needs more extreme or more frequent stimulation. Like any other addict.

Soul rot. Yes. An apt description.


20 posted on 10/06/2011 10:58:35 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson