Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Occupy L.A. Speaker: Violence will be Necessary to Achieve Our Goals
Pajamas Media ^ | Oct. 12, 2011 | PJ Tattler

Posted on 10/12/2011 12:44:28 PM PDT by Beaten Valve

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: absolootezer0

What’s really interesting about these 99%ers is that they are the Red Diaper Doper Baby children of the 1%ers they are demonizing!


61 posted on 10/12/2011 1:43:06 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

**Violence will be Necessary to Achieve Our Goals**

The goal must be for Obama to declare martial law.

They only have to break a few windows - commit suicide by cop and voila!!!


62 posted on 10/12/2011 1:49:52 PM PDT by sodpoodle (God is ignoring me - because He is watching you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

What’s worse than the Occupy Outhouse freak shows is the socialist democrats and MSM falling all over themselves to align with these bums. It doesn’t get more pathetic than that.


63 posted on 10/12/2011 1:52:26 PM PDT by spawn44 (spawn44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve
After dismissing nonviolence as a dead end, he admits that for the Occupiers to achieve their goals, violence and bloodshed will be necessary

This is exactly what President Community Organizer who is orchestrating these "protests" wants. Once these protests turn violent, Obama can justify declaring Martial Law and suspending the election next year.

Trust me, it's coming.

64 posted on 10/12/2011 1:55:05 PM PDT by DustyMoment (Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

It will be interesting to see if their violence is quashed by local law enforcement or if it’s declared an emergency and the National guard responds. If it is the National guard, their messiah has to be the one to unleash them. On the other hand, these morons don’t possess enough brain matter to make that connection.


65 posted on 10/12/2011 1:58:03 PM PDT by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

These idiots have NO idea how big the wall is going to be that falls on them.


66 posted on 10/12/2011 2:05:52 PM PDT by moovova (Report my sarcastic, fear-mongering lies to www.AttackWatch.com by clicking HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

Technically if you are as serious as changing the system as they sound,then yes you are going to need violence at some points.So give these fine if very misdirected individuals some leeway there....at least for telling the truth.

So it actually sounds smarter then most wishy-washy leftist ideology.However since the last time,the left hijacked the country back in 2008,I highly doubt they’d have the popular support or the knowledge to pull it off.

They’d end up like the Republicans(a name used by a bunch of socialists) in Spain in 1939 trying to make peace with Franco and nationalists after shooting up the clergy executing teenage hostages and pissing on the churches. Between a wall and a line of rifles.The ones who didn’t get purged before that happened.


67 posted on 10/12/2011 2:12:14 PM PDT by Del Rapier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
MSM wants them to succeed.. They are in league.
68 posted on 10/12/2011 2:12:14 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (We kneel to no prince but the Prince of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
tea partiers have all the guns.

No.

Tea Partiers are certainly a well armed bunch, but Tea Partiers do NOT have all the guns.

Unfortunately, gang members, labor union members, drug dealers, and other good-for-nothing ne'er-do-wells have guns.

Worse, police (fed, state, county, local) also have guns ... and often have a poor sense of target discrimination.

69 posted on 10/12/2011 2:16:50 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve; All

Well, that didn’t take long. And don’t forget that 0bama, Pelosi, the DCCC, and a whole host of other Dims have endorsed these loons. Oh, and my first thought upon seeing this is that the speaker looked like a foreign revolutionary who’s in our country illegally.


70 posted on 10/12/2011 2:20:47 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter
National Guard is under control of the Governor of the state.

Fed troops can't be used unless there is an act of war by foreign power, such as terrorist attacks.

First there are protest.

Second the protest turn violent and overwhelm police.

Third the National Guard troops are sent in by Governor.

Fourth there are terrorist attacks by the radicals.

Fifth there are terrorist attacks by foreign terrorist which makes it an act of war.

Six the National Guard gives way to Federal troops.

Guess who has absolute power?

71 posted on 10/12/2011 2:26:49 PM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

I suspect gangbangers will associate themselves with whatever movement is more likely to get them free stuff, whether by looting or handouts.


72 posted on 10/12/2011 2:30:45 PM PDT by Ellendra (God feeds the birds of the air, but he doesn't throw it in their nests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
My bad, I thought the change in law back in 07 gave The National Guard to the President. You are correct, it is still up to the governor but if he refuses, Obammy can override him. Which brings up an interesting point, are these ‘Occupy’ protests in States with dem Governors?
73 posted on 10/12/2011 2:36:49 PM PDT by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

Bring it on shite bird come on down to Phoenix and start some shite ... see what happens


74 posted on 10/12/2011 2:41:24 PM PDT by clamper1797 (Hoping to have some change left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

This dumbass doesn’t realize that real violence is not like what he’s used to playing his XBox in mom’s basement.

This ain’t no video game there Skippy.


75 posted on 10/12/2011 2:41:34 PM PDT by montyspython (This thread needs more cowbell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

SIUE meets SSSU. My father’s hourly back hoe rates are real reasonable.


76 posted on 10/12/2011 2:45:30 PM PDT by Molon Labbie ("It's Free, Swipe Your EBT!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
You could be right - the MSM has given up on earning the respect of their readers in exchange for 'prizes' (from liberal groups) .

What's funny is it's going to be horrible for them to be subsidized by the STATE. First, not that many of them will be needed - so there will be more cuts - and second - what little respect they have now, will be gone.

The MSM: Short-sighted fools.

77 posted on 10/12/2011 2:45:30 PM PDT by GOPJ (Occupy Wall Street Zombies Lastest Chant: “You Can Have Sex With Animals”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

“Violence will be Necessary to Achieve Our Goals”

Which are - - -?


78 posted on 10/12/2011 2:45:52 PM PDT by RoadTest (For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

First - chaos. Then, the Man on the White Horse. Just as Gramsci prescribed.


79 posted on 10/12/2011 2:47:53 PM PDT by Noumenon (The only 'NO' a liberal understands is the one that arrives at muzzle velocity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Just a prediction ... not a threat ... but if Obaomao suspends an election he probably won’t be around long


80 posted on 10/12/2011 2:50:35 PM PDT by clamper1797 (Hoping to have some change left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson