“she’s confined to a confidentiality agreement with the National Restaurant Association, where she made the charges against Cain in the late 1990s.”
Well alrighty then. She’s screwed.
I’m very upset myself!!!!!!! SHE IS A LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!
I’ve been uncomfortable with the way that people have been talking about the two or three women mentioned in the Politico article. From the beginning of this story, people have been hateful toward the women and called them names, as FlingWingFlyer does in post # 4.
As far as I can tell, this is a press-generated story. Politico’s hack thinks he can make his name on this “scandal.”
The more people attack unknown women, the more likely they are to need that lawyer, even if he comes off as an ambulance chaser in this report. The more we hear “prove it!” and the hateful comments about their characters, even more so.
We don’t know a thing about any of the women and there’s no evidence that the women are the source of the leak. There were lots of people who knew, the other NRA board members, other employees, and then all of the lawyers’ staff. From what was in the first Politico article, it looks to me as though the leak came from a former campaign staffer and was shored up by the National Restaurant Association board member.
If Cain’s the man we all hope he is, he’ll tell people to move on and to leave these women alone.
When CNN first brought this up this afternoon, they said one of the women had moved in with relatives for now because the media were swarming her DC home.
HOW did they know who she was?
WHO told Politico what the alleged incidents were?
We need answers to these questions.
“Her attorney...also maintained that the case was resolved in a sexual harassment settlement.”
Her attorney is being very dishonest here. “Sexual harassment” has a specific legal meaning, with conditions that must be proven through valid evidence. Making a subjective, one-sided “legal” claim that something is “sexual harassment” is ridiculous:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2800385/posts
And if she had such a solid case- then why didn’t she bring it?
Bill Clinton took advantage of a young aid in the oval office. Then he lied to the world and the court about it. Nothing happened.
Whatever this is, it ain’t dip by comparison to Clinton’s cigar. This lesbian took the money, and went on a cruise. It was all by design. And by taking the money, and signing the papers, she agreed to keep her foul mouth shut forever and ever.
Oh, but now, she wants to say what she “believes,” in her biased ass perspective, was the case. I say STFU lesbo! Whatever you might say now will be in violation of your agreement. Besides who would consider you credible, if you do? Since if you speak now, you will have lied when you took the money, and the pledge of silence.What? You want more money now? What sort of slut are you, anyway?
Was the clintoon grope rule in effect, this is so funny, I see a lot of the perry people are into this coke can story. Next thing you know they will want a supreme court do over, so they can get a rino in.
What’s her name?
What, specifically, is the allegation?
When and where did it happen?
Etc, Etc, etc....
Whenever Team Romney had rumors they wanted to start about other candidates,
Jonathan Martin has been their go-to guy to get those rumors in writing in front of a national audience.
Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"
"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"
What is she saying specifically that Herman did?
I'm sick and tired of these shrews.