Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who is Cain accuser Sharon Bialek?
ABC Chicago ^ | 11-7-11 | Chuck Goudie

Posted on 11/07/2011 4:20:54 PM PST by STARWISE

*snip*

The public record on Bialek begins in 1991 when she filed personal bankruptcy for the first time while living in Des Plaines.

Between 1993 and 1996 Bialek worked for four different companies in promotion and marketing positions.

In 1996, and part of 1997, Bialek was at the National Restaurant Association. After being let go from that job in mid-1997, she says that she went to Washington, D.C., to meet with Cain, president of the association, because she needed a job.

In 1999, Bialek's son Nicholas was born and a paternity lawsuit was filed by the father, a media executive. In 2001 came Bialek's second personal bankruptcy, filed after sizable legal bills. That year she was hired by WGN radio where she worked until 2004 when she took a marketing job and then a job at WCKG radio.

(news video at link)

(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alinksy; cain; caingloriaallred; cainscandals; cainsexualharrass; chicago; falsecharges; gloriaallred; hermancain; sexualharassment; sharonbialek; slander; smear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-220 next last
To: steve8714

Whaa? I live 15-20 minutes away from Mundelein, IL. This is getting scary. Time for some private investigation possibly?


81 posted on 11/07/2011 4:59:07 PM PST by GunPkrBkr (I'd rather be judged by twelve, than carried by six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

Wow. The devil is in the details.


82 posted on 11/07/2011 4:59:39 PM PST by tarpit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

Wow. The devil is in the details.


83 posted on 11/07/2011 4:59:44 PM PST by tarpit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage

Not that Axelrod.


84 posted on 11/07/2011 5:00:23 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
I can take one look at her and tell you what she was and is—she’s a typical modern, liberal, difficult, unwise woman. Now she’s over the hill and still not in any better state emotionally or financially and her “assets” have faded so she’s looking for her 15 minutes and some dough when she thinks it’s good for the getting.

Exactly.

85 posted on 11/07/2011 5:00:57 PM PST by grimalkin (This paper by its very length defends itself against the risk of being read. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Looks like 2 hookers to me. Just sayin’. Both slightly over the age to be first team and both desperate for $$.


86 posted on 11/07/2011 5:01:02 PM PST by lwoodham (Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boop

Oops, didn’t pick up that Axelrod was on the other side. And her bankruptcies were 10 years apart, not 8. My mistake.


87 posted on 11/07/2011 5:01:40 PM PST by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Even doing a name search without any other criteria comes up with nothing.


88 posted on 11/07/2011 5:01:50 PM PST by bcsco (A vote for Cain will cure the Pain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

89 posted on 11/07/2011 5:01:58 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boop

The doc you saw was a financial judgement against her. It wasn’t that David Axelrod and he wasn’t her attorney, he was the attorney for the lending company who was suing her. She doesn’t have an attorney listed on that doc.
(she also had a summary judgment against her and just this past September, had an asset seizure order against her..)


90 posted on 11/07/2011 5:02:31 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

“According to the FEC, she’s a person who has never donated to a Republic candidate or organization.”

And what Republican would have Gloria represent them?


91 posted on 11/07/2011 5:03:06 PM PST by willk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

For someone who has held so many communication/ marketing type positions, it seems odd that she reads from notes typed on copy paper stapled together, so that they must be flipped over in an awkward manner.


92 posted on 11/07/2011 5:03:51 PM PST by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage

Same City... However...

No, “David Axelrod” is not “connected” to Sharon Bialek; plus Cook County court records

By Michelle Malkin • November 7, 2011 03:54 PM

http://michellemalkin.com/2011/11/07/no-david-axelrod-is-not-connected-to-sharon-bialek-plus-cook-county-court-records/


93 posted on 11/07/2011 5:04:09 PM PST by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
I believe that she did try to get Herman’s help in getting a job back in 1997- but that she came on all flirty and he put the brakes on it.

And you believe that why? Cain didn't say that, in fact Cain is only attacking the media and not disputing much in the way of specific details at all. So you're just throwing guesses out there with absolutely zilch to back it up.

This woman went on national TV and accused Herman Cain, a married man and successful business person, of trying to have sex with her in exchange for his help with getting her a job. Her claims are very specific and if true, it demonstrates that at minimum Cain isn't very concerned about his wedding vows. Now why exactly can't Cain specifically reject her charges. If none of this happened, why can't Cain go on TV and specifically address these accusations. I know I sure as heck would. I don't know anyone who has been faithful to their wife and was a good upstanding person who wouldn't be outraged enough to very publicly denounce the specifics of what this woman claims. Yet Cain is not doing that at all, instead he is launching into an attack on the media - which looks to me like he is trying to change the subject.

Here is part of Cain's denial statement:

“It’s easy to make accusations when, by virtue of your anonymity, you don’t have to be held accountable for the claims you’re making,”

Yet this new woman isn't anonymous at all. She CAN be held accountable. If it is all BS, Cain shouldn't have much trouble making that point. Was he with her that night? Did he upgrade her hotel room? These are things he should know, and if there is nothing to her story he could squash her like a bug and win such a PR coup that all the other charges would likely be dismissed by the public as well. But Cain isn't doing that, he is trying to change the subject.

I have no idea if this is true, the accusations are probably overblown. But I remember when we got all the allegations against Arnold when he was running in the recall election. Women were coming out of the woodwork claiming he was a serial groper and sex hound. I remember conservatives dismissed the charges as media lies. Now it turns out those weren't lies at all - worse, Arnold even knocked up his freaking maid and has a kid with her. Cain's defense here is weak and he will have to do a lot better.

94 posted on 11/07/2011 5:04:28 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Court records indicate Bialek had financial difficulties a decade ago when she filed for bankruptcy protection and reported $4,500 in unpaid rent and $13,000 in outstanding credit card bills.
95 posted on 11/07/2011 5:04:57 PM PST by NoLibZone (Occupy is the DNC's use of children,indigent & infirm to push back TeaParty calls for smaller gov't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boop
Not that axelrod, do not think he is in the collection practice
96 posted on 11/07/2011 5:06:18 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

97 posted on 11/07/2011 5:08:45 PM PST by NoLibZone (Occupy is the DNC's use of children,indigent & infirm to push back TeaParty calls for smaller gov't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage

Different David Axelrod. That’s been determined early on...


98 posted on 11/07/2011 5:08:49 PM PST by bcsco (A vote for Cain will cure the Pain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Is that a herpe on her lip?


99 posted on 11/07/2011 5:09:32 PM PST by Force of Truth (Intelligence and virtue are preferable in a candidate, but I'd much rather he or she be chinchy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Sharon Bialek and Gloria Allred


100 posted on 11/07/2011 5:11:57 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-220 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson