Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio Voters Choose To Opt Out Of Health Mandate (Reject Obamacare)
OhioVotes2011/AP ^ | November 8, 2011 | Staff

Posted on 11/08/2011 7:14:30 PM PST by 50mm

Voters in Ohio have approved a ballot measure intended to keep government from requiring Ohioans to participate in any health care system.

The constitutional amendment passed is largely symbolic, coming in response to the 2009 federal health care overhaul, a provision of which mandates that most Americans purchase health care.

(Excerpt) Read more at 2.ohiovotes2011.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: commiecare; health; obamacare; ohioobamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: FlipWilson
The issue 3 on obamacare is purely symbolic. It will have no legal weight or meaning. It is no more than an opinion poll, and I don't know why the state bothered.
21 posted on 11/08/2011 7:50:10 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

Let it be so. Bring up each part of the original bill separately, and then inform the public that it takes 14 taxpayers to support ONE retired cop. Who mysteriously develops “Chief’s disease” a year before retirement. At 53.


22 posted on 11/08/2011 7:51:27 PM PST by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
The only obvious alternative now is massive layoffs of the same insects...

I'm looking forward to that.

23 posted on 11/08/2011 7:51:38 PM PST by 50mm (Trust nobody and you'll never be disappointed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
No taxes on the ballot today, except some local and county levies.
24 posted on 11/08/2011 7:52:14 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson
As for the unions, let them gloat. Reality will begin to set in shortly in the form of layoff notices. There's no money to give them what they want.

As an example of their tactics, they ran ads comparing the SB-5(Issue 2) to Rite Aid denying health insurance to grannies working in their stores. Completely false. Nice to know that the police of Ohio are some of the most dishonest citizens that we have, maybe more crooked than the criminals.

25 posted on 11/08/2011 7:57:04 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Great, now they can live in a bankrupt state but at least they won’t have Obammycare. Something about this entire vote makes NO sense to me.


Ohio failed to separate cops and fire from the others as Wisconsin did. With cops and fire in the deal, the unions were able to run emotionally-charged ads about life without cops and fire and how everyone will die without them. “So, ya know, you better vote union blah blah blah.”


26 posted on 11/08/2011 7:58:07 PM PST by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I don't think those details made any difference at all. This vote was about one thing--union "rights" to collective bargaining for every little benefit and work rule, guaranteeing that they would be able to continue to loot the treasury. That was the one and only issue in Issue 2.

The minutiae you mention may have attracted the attention of a few retirees with lots of time on their hands, but nobody else even noticed.

27 posted on 11/08/2011 8:01:58 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Faith
Let's hope so. Otherwise there will be a large number of very nasty laid off goobermint employees screeching in the streets.

What most people did not get is that voting AGAINST issue 2 was voting FOR layoffs. The cops and teachers and smokeaters didn't tell people the truth. Now they will just try to hold up the state for more tax revenues.

28 posted on 11/08/2011 8:05:27 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

hinckley buzzard wrote:

“The issue 3 on obamacare is purely symbolic. It will have no legal weight or meaning. It is no more than an opinion poll, and I don’t know why the state bothered.”

**************************************************************

I disagree. Don’t think for one second that the U.S. Supreme Court isn’t going to take Ohio voters’ OVERWHELMING rejection of the individual mandate into consideration when the court hears the case next spring.

In my opinion, this further reinforces Obama’s negative approval rating in Ohio and therefore he would likely lose that state if the presidential election were held today.


29 posted on 11/08/2011 8:07:39 PM PST by DestroyLiberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

Former Ohio Gov. Strickland was on the Greta Show on FNC and he said he was really proud of Ohio rejecting issue 2. Greta asks him if he was also proud of Obamacare being voted down. He decided to dodge the question by saying that issue wasn’t really debated or discussed much. He was not asked if he was proud of the 2010 ohio governor results when Strickland lost. I know I was proud. The spin by Strickland was pretty laughable.


30 posted on 11/08/2011 8:12:39 PM PST by fkabuckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Totally disagree that this was a clean bill. This bill wasn’t about the need. This vote was not about government employees paying more toward their pensions. It was about everything except that. It was about the weeds. It was about firefighter hires, and hours, and methods. It was about teacher seniority and evaluations and supervision.

This was an easy bill for Ohioans to reject. The Republican house and senate were derelict in allowing a new governor to be injured the way Kasich has been.


31 posted on 11/08/2011 8:14:35 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

” - - - a provision of which mandates that most Americans purchase - - - .”

The British tried that on us before - - - .

It is time to again break out the flag of that day: “DON’T TREAD ON ME.”


32 posted on 11/08/2011 8:19:24 PM PST by Graewoulf ( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antonico

I say good for Kasich. I am sick of firefighters and cops, Sorry..I don’t like being a hostage to anyone and that’s what these two groups keep doing to us.


33 posted on 11/08/2011 8:20:07 PM PST by Hildy ("When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - SocratesH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

I flew my Gadsden at my house today and was wearing a Gadsden lapel pin on when I voted. I got some dirty looks from ‘rat types at my polling location.


34 posted on 11/08/2011 8:24:20 PM PST by 50mm (Trust nobody and you'll never be disappointed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

And I thought American voters were just mere cattle waiting to be slaughtered by their Democrat overlords. I guess they’re cattle with just a little bit of forsight.


35 posted on 11/08/2011 8:27:38 PM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

I won’t be kind...most of them didn’t understand the ballot issues...either that or they’re all a bunch of bipolar nutjobs..


36 posted on 11/08/2011 8:35:27 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antonico

I can’t fathom why they thought doing SB5 this way would work.


37 posted on 11/08/2011 8:38:28 PM PST by RockinRight (One year from now, we have an opportunity to take our nation back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Thanks for succintly explaining the why and wherefore. We out-of-staters aren’t aware of the skinny.

I”m told the bill will be reintroduced once split into sensible parts.


38 posted on 11/08/2011 8:38:40 PM PST by chiller ( Elect another batch of TPartiers and it won't matter which R we elect. WE will lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

” - - - Gadsden lapel pin - - - “

Good for you! Now I want to get a lapel pin and cuff links too! Christmas is coming!


39 posted on 11/08/2011 8:42:41 PM PST by Graewoulf ( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PaleoBob

Yeah their adds were like,

“Nice house and family ya got there.
Would be a shame if somethin’ would happen to them.”


40 posted on 11/08/2011 9:02:36 PM PST by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson