Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A word about Romney
vanity | Nov 12, 2011 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 11/12/2011 1:29:02 PM PST by Jim Robinson

RINO.

Three words: liberal progressive RINO.

Add a fourth, fifth, sixth, etc: unprincipled, untrustworthy, flip-flopper, aisle-crossing, fraud, liar, political whore.

And a few more: abortionist, gay rights panderer, gun-grabber, global warming advocate, big government mandate lover, socialist healthcare pusher, constitution trampling, liberal judge appointing, TARP loving, bailout loving, stimulus pushing Keynesian statist.

That my friends, is no definition of conservative or of conservatism. Not even close. In fact it's the exact opposite.

Free Republic is and will remain an exclusive pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-constitution, pro-small government, pro-capitalism, pro-defense, pro-borders, grassroots patriotic conservative site, regardless of party politics.

I support the Republican party as long as it promotes positions and candidates that I can agree with. The current party platform is a pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-constitution, pro-small government, pro-capitalism, pro-defense, pro-borders, patriotic, traditional conservative platform. When they formally (or informally) start knocking out or ignoring traditional conservative foundational planks so they can run liberal progressive RINOS then they have lost me. It won't be that I've left the Republican party, the Republican party will have left me.

Some people say FR is a cult. Well, I don't know about that, but I'll be damned if we're going to change our core principles and values so that we can support a man who has spent a political lifetime trying to run to the left of Ted Kennedy.

Every one of his leftist positions listed above are documented on the video linked below, which is a compilation of about a dozen debates and other Romney appearances where he vehemently advocates and defends his leftist positions and ideals:

Romney in his on words

Watch it all the way through. If he becomes the Republican nominee, I can guarantee you you will see these clips and more like them, over and over again on national TV. Romney is totally untrustworthy. And it's all documented in living color.

Yeah, I know. He's changed. He's now a life-long hunter who's always been pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-small government. And "most of his positions, all of them actually, have always been conservative." Just ask him. And that's the point. He's changed his mind, or at least, he's changed his political platform. And he'll change his mind again tomorrow. He'll continue changing his mind to match the current political winds. That's what unprincipled, untrustworthy, lying political whores do. It's in the nature of the beast.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: amen; backstabberromney; carpetbaggerromney; evaderromney; happymormon; homonaziagenda; homosexualagenda; ineligibleromney; liberalrepublican; moralabsolutes; pederastagenda; rino; romney; romneybackstabbing; romneybigdig; romneycare; romneyevasion; romneyfees; romneyflipflops; romneylies; romneymarrige; slickmitt; stenchofromney; teapartyrebellion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-159 next last
To: Jim Robinson

Bttt


101 posted on 11/12/2011 6:20:43 PM PST by amom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I believe a Republican Obama is more damaging to the nation than a Democrat Obama.


102 posted on 11/12/2011 6:21:34 PM PST by gitmo (Hatred of those who think differently is the left's unifying principle.-Ralph Peters NY Post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all the best

“Romney is a second-rate Democrat.”

Exactly. Why go with this yo-yo when you can have the real thing?


103 posted on 11/12/2011 6:35:44 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Cain & Gingrich 2012..theres plenty of work to be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: verity

“The Forum is more conservative than the electorate. We could very well be disappointed with the outcome.”

C’est la vie. We were disappointed in 2008 as well.


104 posted on 11/12/2011 6:37:47 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Cain & Gingrich 2012..theres plenty of work to be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: verity

“Does this mean a second Obama term?”

I’ve been saying for some time that there is a very good chance of obama being re-elected. Never underestimate the ability of the Vichy gop to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.


105 posted on 11/12/2011 6:40:03 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Cain & Gingrich 2012..theres plenty of work to be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Mitt Romney supports homo activists in their war against the Boy Scouts.

Starting during the Clinton Administration (does the name Roberta Achtenberg ring a bell?) the Boy Scouts came under relentless fire by the Democrats and their newsrooms for rejecting the idea that they, the Boy Scouts of America, should welcome homosexual scout leaders into the organization and let them take little boys off into the woods. Boy Scouts leaders didn’t think this was such a good idea. Naturally, Massachusetts Mittens sided with the homo activists.

Below are a couple of columns from 10 and 12 years ago about the Boy Scouts being turned away by Mitt Romney and the Olympics Committee for volunteer work on the Salt Lake Olympics. The Boy Scouts had been very active and high profile at the 1996 Atlanta Olympics and were looking forward to participating once again. But the Boy Scouts had just won an important Supreme Court case (in June 2000 the Supreme Court ruled that the BSA was a private organization that could choose whoever they wanted as scout leaders and could therefore reject sodomites) and the Democrats/homos were still mighty ticked off about it. Massachusetts Mittens could always be counted on to pander to homo activists, of course, so he gladly came up with a lame lie of an excuse for turning the Boy Scouts away from the Salt Lake Olympics. The Boy Scouts’ disappointment was palpable, and Mitt Romney never returned their calls.

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2000/12/15/214301.shtml

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/2/7/135258.shtml


106 posted on 11/12/2011 6:44:00 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: etradervic

“Even though I am for Newt, I will gladly vote for Romney if nominated.”

I suggest you work very, very hard for a candidate other than mittens to be nominated. Because without the conservative base, the gop candidate loses. I’m not naive enough to think that all conservatives will sit this one out, but enough will go out of their way to find something else to do on election day to tip the election.

The argument that “we have to vote for the gop candidate or life as we know it will no longer continue” no longer holds as much sway as it once did.


107 posted on 11/12/2011 6:47:10 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Cain & Gingrich 2012..theres plenty of work to be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

“My quadrennial note: FR will come about to support the Republican candidate.”

If it’s mittens, I find that doubtful. Too many FReepers have developed a severe allergic reaction to rino.


108 posted on 11/12/2011 6:51:04 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Cain & Gingrich 2012..theres plenty of work to be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: etradervic

There is no difference between Romney and Obama. None, Zero, Zilch, Nada.


109 posted on 11/12/2011 6:55:13 PM PST by dfwgator (I stand with Herman Cain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Vader
not wishing to be pedantic, but that first picture shows a rack of air rifles not firearms.

But they HUNT with those in Europe!

110 posted on 11/12/2011 6:55:50 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

“Romney would easily be the most liberal Republican president since Nixon, and his nomination would be the end of the Republican party.”

You’re right, and that part leaves me conflicted. IF the gop nominates mittens, they go the way of the dodo bird. I’d really like to see that happen, but on the other hand I realllllly want to see them nominate an actual conservative who might even defeat obama also.

I care more about the country than I dislike the gop, so I’m still holding out some hope that they’ll nominate a conservative.


111 posted on 11/12/2011 6:57:55 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Cain & Gingrich 2012..theres plenty of work to be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: All


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


112 posted on 11/12/2011 6:59:26 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Well, I will hold on to your optimism to help keep my sanity. Thank you.


113 posted on 11/12/2011 7:14:35 PM PST by WVNan (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: WVNan
Well, I will hold on to your optimism to help keep my sanity. Thank you.

You're welcome, Nan.

Wanna feel really good? Go here: Sarah Palin's Earthquake Movement

114 posted on 11/12/2011 7:44:41 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: All

I really dont think the republican party heard us or the tea party, they took the momentum the tea party gave them and squandered it, now for their so called election there isnt a worthy one on the stage except for Paul or Johnson. I guess we need another 4 years of obama, the GOP snatching defeat from the jaws victory.


115 posted on 11/12/2011 7:56:23 PM PST by 09Patriot (your freedom to be you, includes my freedom to be from you.--Wilkow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

i wouldnt trust anyone that WANTED to be Mccain’s vp .her standing wouldve been higher in my eyes to have her turn it down, quite frankly I dont know why she didnt, she had nothing in common with that old coot.


116 posted on 11/12/2011 7:59:02 PM PST by 09Patriot (your freedom to be you, includes my freedom to be from you.--Wilkow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: 09Patriot
i wouldnt trust anyone that WANTED to be Mccain’s vp .her standing wouldve been higher in my eyes to have her turn it down, quite frankly I dont know why she didnt

For those who understand, no explanation is necessary. For those who don't, no explanation is possible.

117 posted on 11/12/2011 8:14:18 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Some people say FR is a cult.
Whoever says that doesn't know the meaning of the word "cult".

A privately run conservative forum has a right to prevent leftist/RINO propaganda from displaying on its pages.

And exercising that right doesn't make it a "cult", just like me not opening my home to a Mormon missionary doesn't make me a "bigot".

118 posted on 11/12/2011 8:20:15 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
And exercising that right doesn't make it a "cult", just like me not opening my home to a Mormon missionary doesn't make me a "bigot".

True.

--MormonDude(It's when you tell OTHERS not to; THAT makes you a bigot - and a HATEFUL one at that!!)









119 posted on 11/13/2011 4:50:39 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

so you wanted her to carry president mccains water....yeah that would improve her standing...got it.


120 posted on 11/13/2011 5:39:14 AM PST by 09Patriot (your freedom to be you, includes my freedom to be from you.--Wilkow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: BobL; All
" I guess we can nominate a moderate and be disappointed..."

"WE", IMHO, implies a monolithic Republican electorate. That is simply not the case and is the reason I expressed my concern.

121 posted on 11/13/2011 7:32:51 AM PST by verity (The Obama Administration is a Criminal Enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Three words:
Used Car Salesman.


122 posted on 11/13/2011 8:49:16 AM PST by fwdude ("When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Not a Romney supporter in any way, shape or form. And I know you're not. But why in 08 was the jaw bone media announcing that Romney was not only conservative but the person to save the day?

In February 2008, the most influential and persuasive jaw bone media personality threw his all-important support to Romney’s then struggling candidacy. “I think now, based on the way the campaign has shaken out, that there probably is a candidate on our side who does embody all three legs of the conservative stool, and that’s Romney,” Rush Limbaugh told his huge audience. “The three legs of the stool are national security/foreign policy, the social conservatives, and the fiscal conservatives.”

After Rush highlighted the de facto endorsement in his newsletter under the headline “One Candidate Now Represents All Three Legs of Conservatism,” the rest of syndicated talk radio—Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Michael Savage, Glenn Beck—largely followed suit. Laura Ingraham introduced Romney at CPAC as a “true conservative” and “a conservative’s conservative.” (Alone among the top-rated national hosts, I openly dissented and proudly endorsed McCain.) Even Jim DeMint, the most conservative member of the U.S. Senate, fell in line behind the Mittster. Is it any wonder conservatives have electoral whiplash. And why is it not true now?

123 posted on 11/13/2011 2:18:12 PM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Mitt Romney is not now and has ever been a conservative. He’s a flat out liar.


124 posted on 11/13/2011 2:21:45 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

And anyone who says Romney is a conservative has his head up his arse:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7OQoBxZZPqU


125 posted on 11/13/2011 2:23:09 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I agree and my point exactly. So all those jaw boners are head up their arsers.


126 posted on 11/13/2011 2:25:09 PM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Although I am a harsh critic of Mormonism, I would not vote for Mitt Romney if he were an evangelical Christian. It’s his political views which disqualify him.


127 posted on 11/13/2011 5:05:25 PM PST by CommerceComet (Governor Romney, why would any conservative vote for the author of the beta version of ObamaCare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis; Jim Robinson
That is one of the ugliest photographs in American political history.

But it's also one of the most instructive.

128 posted on 11/13/2011 10:07:36 PM PST by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

Same here. I wouldn’t vote for him even if claimed to be a lifelong Christian.

A man who who would say and do these evil things obviously does not believe in the same Judeo-Christian God and bible that I know: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7OQoBxZZPqU


129 posted on 11/13/2011 10:24:32 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

BTTT


130 posted on 11/14/2011 5:24:38 AM PST by syriacus (Romney looks good in his Hallowe'en costume - dressed like a Conservative. TRICK OR TREAT?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Jim, you certainly have all your ducks in a row. Your clarity is very much appreciated and, in this case especially, agreed with.


131 posted on 11/14/2011 3:33:32 PM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

A word? hhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

PUTZ


132 posted on 11/15/2011 10:39:32 PM PST by ImpBill ("America, where are you now?" - Little "r" republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Count me in I’m with you.


133 posted on 11/21/2011 3:06:16 PM PST by painter (No wonder democrats don't mind taxes.THEY DON'T PAY THEM !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Romney IS Obama - just paler. NO MITT EVER!!


134 posted on 11/21/2011 10:10:42 PM PST by reaganaut (Romney IS Obama - just 'white and delightsome' 2 Nephi 30:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper; All

While I do not specially like Romney, saying four more years of Obama would be tolerable is definitely cutting off your nose to spite your face. NOTHING could be worse than the IRREPERABLE damage four more years of Islamic Obama would inflict on our nation, spiritually, emotionally, culturally, globally, financially and from an ideological viewpoint.

In weighing “anyone but Obama” against “anyone but Romney”, I submit that I would not support keeping Obama. Not even if I held my nose. Any Republican, is better than Obozo, though as defined here you would need a gas mask for a Romney presidency.


135 posted on 11/22/2011 7:32:00 PM PST by FARS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

My #1 reason for not supporting Mitt Romney is a very lefty friend who ‘could live with him’ as President. I presume that’s the same reason the press is ignoring him, too. If Obama doesn’t win re-election, they figure they will hardly notice the difference.


136 posted on 11/22/2011 11:10:20 PM PST by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FARS; All
"...saying four more years of Obama would be tolerable is definitely cutting off your nose to spite your face."

Definitely not, because it was not just four years I was talking about, but rather looking long term there-after.

Briefly:
Four years of Obama and then another chance of getting a Conservative President.
VERSUS
Four or possibly 8 years of Romney and then getting another Liberal Democrat ( the only ones the Democrats promote ie: Clinton, Gore, Pelosi, Reid, Obama) for another 4 or 8 years.

The point of my post was to give a heads-up to Jim Robinson that if Romney gains the nomination and FR is not supporting Romney, then it will be said by some FR is in a way supporting four more years of Obama.

It is bad enough that the Democrats only give as Liberals for leadership. That problem is made exponentially worse by Republican RINO's pretending to be Conservatives so they can get elected.

To take the long view requires a certain degree of steady nerves and power of reasoning.

137 posted on 11/22/2011 11:41:56 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper (For years the Left protested "the occupation of Iraq"- now they want to "Occupy" all across the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

If I use any of the words that describe Romney here, I’ll get banned!


138 posted on 11/24/2011 7:56:51 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Oops, given recent events I’d better clarify that post. I mean that all the words describing Romney are profane, vulgar, etc., and if I use them I’ll get banned for bad language! ;-)


139 posted on 11/24/2011 7:58:36 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
Romney was out front pretending to support McCain/Palin in 2008, while his staffers were sabotaging the campaign from within and without.

How the hell do you go about "sabotaging" a ticket that already has Juan "Lettuce" McCain at the top???

140 posted on 11/24/2011 8:05:55 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW; verity; MontaniSemperLiberi
..... the electorate is generally uninformed. They are basically conservative but have no access to truth.

I disagree. The public is not "generally" uninformed. They are Specifically, Totally, and Abysmally uninformed, mentally unformed, and despite "universal literacy," dumbed-down and ignorant of our own history and of their rights and obligations as citizens.

"Basically conservative" probably means that as long as their TV works, the trailer isn't too hot or too cold, and McDonald's is open they will vote, (i.e., if they bother to vote) for whomsoever promises to keep things that way.

The abolition of poll taxes, property requirements, literacy requirements, and now even citizenship requirements in many jurisdictions means we increasingly live under the tyranny of the ignorant and illegal. All "democracies" wind down from that moment when the elected discover they can stay in power by writing checks to their friends and supporters on the public treasury. The "democracy" lasts until the treasury is empty and the supporters of one party or faction take up arms to take away the goods and treasure of another party.

That point is getting closer.

141 posted on 11/25/2011 5:53:56 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure this eligibility stuff out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
You can keep your smug attitude. Marxists have been working on changing the country for decades. If infiltration of key areas didn't work, no one would bother.

"Socialism is precisely the religion that must overwhelm Christianity. … In the new order, Socialism will triumph by first capturing the culture via infiltration of schools, universities, churches and the media by transforming the consciousness of society." Antonio Gramsci - Marxist - teacher of Saul Alinsky, teacher of Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton

142 posted on 11/25/2011 8:04:42 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I agree Jim. I think you should consider adding your name to the title, more people might click if they know it's from you.

Thanks for all you do!

143 posted on 11/25/2011 6:57:49 PM PST by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available 4 FREE at CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
DJ, I do NOT share your sanguine attitude toward the electorate, more than half of whom do not bother to vote. Neither am I heartened by college graduates who know less of American civics than was required of a HS sophomore in 1950.

The Marxist ideology for which our POTUS is an admirable poster-child, has taken a giant leap in impoverishing the nation on its way to the civil strife, from which they hope to emerge victorious, if not the first time, the second or third.

For the Left, Class Warfare starts as a rhetorical device, but as history might show, it always ends in real war.

144 posted on 11/26/2011 9:36:46 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure this eligibility stuff out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

You totally missed my point.


145 posted on 11/26/2011 10:20:17 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
You totally missed my point

Forced to agree.

146 posted on 11/26/2011 11:17:05 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure this eligibility stuff out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican
...water down your conservative values by electing these phoney ‘moderate’ leaders and you will find it very hard to return to conservatism and doom yourself as a result. Like Bush, he will become the acceptable face of conservatism when in reality Romney is no conservative at all!

Precisely!

That is how the "middle-of-the-road" has ended up in the left ditch after the last three decades. Each time the "conservative" who isn't, quite, is nominated, they redefine what "conservative" is in the public arena.

Each time, that also redefines those of us who have not changed our stance on any of the issues as being a little more "extreme" and a 'little farther to the right'.

How else could people who once were considered the backbone of America, gun owners, bible readers, and familliar with the US Constitution be branded as "extremists" and 'potential domestic terrorists'?

147 posted on 11/27/2011 5:37:10 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I don't know if anyone else has had the guts to tell you, but if Romney is the GOP nominee I'll vote for him and I'm guessing a lot of other FReepers will too. Unfortunately Obama and our elected representatives have left us in such a state that this country will not survive another 4 years of Obama. All the principled conservatives in the world won't be able to save us at that point. I'm not planning to vote for Mitt in the primary, but if he is the nominee I can't see giving Obama another 4 years by staying home or voting 3rd party. Having said that, since I live in California it probably doesn't matter. McCain a RINO too and I'm guessing even you voted for him? The SCOTUS may have as many as 3 retirements/deaths in the next 4-5 years. That alone is worth supporting Mitt if he is the nominee.
148 posted on 11/30/2011 12:52:45 PM PST by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- follow the money and you'll find truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Hate to spoil your party but Romney appoints liberal judges.


149 posted on 11/30/2011 1:16:05 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
God willing, he'll have a GOP senate that will check him on that. At the end of the day, a Mitt nominee will not be nearly as liberal as an Obama one. Not that I regularly read HuffPo, but here's a list or articles on Obama judicial nominees that’ll curl your hair.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/obama-judicial-nominees

150 posted on 11/30/2011 1:38:10 PM PST by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- follow the money and you'll find truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson