Posted on 01/02/2012 9:42:46 AM PST by SvenMagnussen
Las Vegas 1 January 2011 (sic). President Obama has(sic) had a dream run to the White House and hopes to remain there for another term. His chances of re election are diminished by his failure to convince Americans that he is entitled to the office he holds.
There are many Americans who are concerned that Barack Obama is not who and what he says he is. Veterans like Robert Laity are frustrated that media outlets have not pressured President Obama into releasing a real authenticated copy of his birth certificate. There appears little doubt that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii but many people believe that he is not entitled to hold his office as he is ineligible due to the status of his parents. The President's birth certificate would clear up that issue.
Robert Laity is a vocal American who is complaining to have Barack Obama charged with electoral fraud. The issue seems to be that the election authorities do not require a candidate to prove that he or she is entitled to seek an office. It is up to someone to prove that a candidate is not entitled to stand.
(Excerpt) Read more at international.to ...
Can't remember the name of the case but the Supreme court has made at least one ruling that you MUST have TWO citizen parents in order to be a Natural born citizen. Being a citizen is not enough, you must be natural born. Bozo is NOT eligible to be President since, by his own admission, his father is a British subject.
A very interesting bit of detective work...
1. Back in 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes.’ So how can the Obama ‘birth certificate’ state he is ‘African-American’ when the term wasn’t even used at that time?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama’s father was born in “Kenya, East Africa.” This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate.”
3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital.” This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home,” respectively. The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
Resources:
http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Kenya
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
Why hasn’t this been discussed in the major media?????
soetoro/obama already posted 2 bc stating BHO sr as the father and ‘african’ as the father’s ‘nationality’!
if his ‘real’ bc, if any, does not show a father, that means he has lied under oath!
Soetor/obama is stuck with BHO sr as his father, a father that is NOT a US citizen!
Suppose no father was listed in the BC, there is still these issues -
1. his mother did not meet the age and residency requirement to confer US citizenship to him.
2. he was adopted by an Indonesian, Lolo Soetoro, and was taken to Indonesia to study in a state school that only ‘Indonesian’ can enroll in. The school registration paper shows his name as ‘Barry Soetoro’ - proof that he was adopted by his Indonesian step-father. (There was also a divorce paper showing barry as the ‘minor’ son ) So the Indonesian Barry Soetoro, upon return to Hawaii, must naturalize to be a US citizen again. But there is no record of his naturalization!
If he was really born in Hawaii, he could be a US citizen, turned Indonesian when adopted by his step-father, then remains an Indoenesian till now because he has never naturalized to be a US citizen!
That is probably why he will not release his college records, which will show that he was getting foreign aids as a foreign student!
Unfortunately you are right! IT IS not going to happen! The candidates are too stupid and the people are too.... well, you fill in the blanks.
I don't understand. Who are "they"?
If his father was naturalized prior to Mitt’ birth then Mitt is a nbc.
Congratulations! You are 100 percent Correcto Mungo.
McCain was not born in the Canal Zone. He was born off base. He also is not an NBC.
He was born in Colón. Colón is now and always has been in Panama. Like West Berlin, surrounded by East Germany, it was surrounded by the Canal Zone, but never part of it.
That "Colon" birth certificate is a fake. He was born on the Coco Solo submarine base. McCain has NOT RELEASED his birth certificate. He has shown it to some reporters but he has NOT RELEASED it.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/05/john_mccains_birthplace.html
You are saying what I have been saying for three years. Make him PROVE he is eligible by showing an ORIGINAL birth certificate or don’t let him on the ballot.
(Which is what should have been done in the first place.)
Why would someone release a fake BC that shows they are NOT qualified for a job?
According to some freepers, if you cannot trace back to the Mayflower, you cannot be President.
Kinda defeats all the action of 1776, but hey...purity prevails.
McCain was NOT BORN off the base. He was born in the base hospital, i.e. American territory.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/05/john_mccains_birthplace.html
Your question answers itself. He didn't. That birth certificate was a forgery created by an Obot to muddy the waters.
>> 1. Back in 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes.’ So how can the Obama ‘birth certificate’ state he is ‘African-American’ when the term wasn’t even used at that time? <<
With a Court Order, the HI DoH records administrator has the authority to edit, change, update or modify an existing record and backdate it to the original filing date to mask the change, i.e. a child is adopted and his birth name and the name of his birth father are changed ... the original is sealed and archived and a new COLB is created and backdated.
The clues to the Soetoro adoption are:
1) BHO’s II original long form BC has been sealed and archived by Hawaii DoH
2) BHO’s II original long form BC has a “date accepted” and his COLB has a “date filed”. The “date filed” is due to a Court Ordered changed, update, edit or modification by the Hawaii DoH records administrator.
3) The original should have stated BHO Sr. race as Negro and the updated, modified, changed or politically correct Court Order states his race is African American.
Is that so? Source please.
Kinda defeats all the action of 1776, but hey...purity prevails.
There are no reasonable freepers who assert this. A few muddled souls have claimed that your parents had to be "natural born citizens" but only a very few have claimed such and they were quickly corrected by the vast majority who knew better.
It doesn't matter HOW your parents became citizens, whether by naturalization, by statute, by derivation, by being born within the geographical boundaries of the U.S. or by being "born a Natural citizen." What matters is that a born child has no claim on allegiance but to this country.
Undivided Allegiance is the entire point.
I tend to think that Romney is eligible, since his father was running to be the Democrat nominee.
I could be wrong, but I don’t think the elites were far enough along to ignore the Constitution at that point.
So, if Romney I was eligible, Romney II must also be eligible.
I knew you were going to ask me that. Can you not google it yourself? It took me awhile to find it the last time.
I’m always willing to do the work needed to support what I say.
Here is one source I found after a quick search. Here is also the supposed lawsuit in which the fake McCain birth certificate was supposedly presented as “evidence.”
http://obamaeligibility.org/2010/04/24/educating-the-confused-mccains-birth-certificate/
http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/hollanderv.mccain.php
That is as much time as i’m going to spend on it. If you feel strongly about it, you can look up more information yourself. I think it is sufficient that I have shown that the “Colon” birth certificate is FAKE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.