Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With Mitt in the lead, anti-Romney Republicans weigh their options
The Hill ^ | February 4, 2012 | Niall Stanage

Posted on 02/04/2012 3:31:39 PM PST by Clintonfatigued

Those who continue to believe that Romney can be stopped are focused — as is the campaign of Newt Gingrich — on the possibility of a long delegate fight. They have largely given up hope of anyone winning a knockout victory over Romney, hoping instead that some other candidate can prevent the former Massachusetts governor from wrapping the race up before the Republican National Convention, which is set for Tampa, Fla., in late August.

“We have never gone through a delegate fight like this,” said Bob Vander Plaats, an influential conservative and the head of the Iowa-based Family Leader organization. “You need around 600 delegates to win, and I think that will be very difficult for Gov. Romney.”

Vander Plaats added that the reason Gingrich has been emphasizing that there are 46 states to go in the contest is because “he can do the math”.

Similar themes are sounded by prominent conservatives in the media. Erick Erickson of Red State wrote Thursday that the fact that many states award their delegates proportionally, rather than on a winner-take-all basis, could play to Gingrich’s advantage.

“If Gingrich is serious about staying in till the convention, he could deny Romney a first ballot win and spare the base from the man they don’t like, even if Newt himself cannot get the nomination. He is more of a long shot today than he was a day before Florida, but he can still be the nominee,” Erickson wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bobvanderplaats; delegates; dothemath; electoralmath; gingrich; math; newt; newtgingrich; plaats; vanderplaats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: WILLIALAL

“they will have to forgo the strong desire to win national elections for awhile.”

As long as the establishment is setting the agenda and essentially controlling the GOP, the conservatives really are not winning anything. Nominating a Democrat like Romney is a good example of that- a Northeastern gungrabbing liberal who took the first steps towards socialized medicine shouldn’t even be considered as a Republican dogcatcher. And yet, that’s what they are doing. I wouldn’t think at this point its a matter of wanting to- its a matter of having to. The lengths to which the elites are going to select their candidate are proof that they only want conservative votes, and their candidate’s track record proves they don’t want conservative policy. With allies like that, who needs enemies?


61 posted on 02/04/2012 9:47:57 PM PST by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: gusty
Barbara Boxer and Diane (sic) Feinstein thank you. You should add that Republicans have never stood a better chance in California since. About 26 years ago. Hey lets do this on a national level, that way we can also lose them all for a quarter of a century. It seems we are determined to bite off our nose in order to spite our face. I have a better idea, why don’t we just win this November with whoever wins the nomination and then take it from there.

You had better get your facts straight.

First of all, my post was about the 1986 race. Barbara Boxer ran in 1992, narrowly beating Bruce Herschensohn, a solid conservative for whom I worked my heart out. Herschensohn would probably have won if President Bush hadn't abandoned California during his re-election campaign.

And why should Dianne Feinstein thank me? After all, I did vote for her opponent, the Republican incumbent John Seymour (pronounced "see more," as in "see more taxes"), whom Pete Wilson appointed to fill his old Senate seat when he was elected governor, even though Seymour was a pro-abortion in-your-face liberal.

62 posted on 02/04/2012 9:50:06 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Don’t support Newt. He would lose big among women voters.
_____________________________________________

Newt has no problem with women having equal rights..

The one with the baggage as far as women go is Romney

That women are 2nd class citizens owned by their husbands wont win him a lot of votes...


63 posted on 02/04/2012 10:05:58 PM PST by Tennessee Nana (Romney I like firing people......and IÂ’m not concerned about the very poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

“We have never gone through a delegate fight like this”

Yes because usually the conservatives let the establishment jam some moderate down our throats. This year we are a little peeved about it.


64 posted on 02/04/2012 10:11:11 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

Write ins do not count in Virginia.


65 posted on 02/04/2012 10:13:48 PM PST by Ingtar (I never thought I would come to say it, but "Go Newt!" Our last, best chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I’ll vote constitution party, if Romney is the GOP candidate.

I’m AM going to vote for an alternative. I will not vote for either of the two Alinsky disciples, Obama and Romney.


66 posted on 02/04/2012 10:28:26 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Mitt Romney will not win.

Damn right he won't.

Before this is over, he'll wish he was a dog strapped to the roof of a car.

67 posted on 02/04/2012 10:34:46 PM PST by Rome2000 (MYTH ROMNEY IS A MORMON MELCHIDEZEK HIGH PRIEST AND RICK SANTORUM IS A DICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WILLIALAL
No matter how strong the Tea Party thinks they are, they are not, at this time, strong enough to take over the party and force it to change directions.

That's because it is not really a political party but a disorganized group of pissed off REAL AMERICANS.

If the mormon bishop and the RNC elite succeed in buying the GOP nomination, then the Tea Party fields a candidate for POTUS, and becomes a real political party dedicated to the destruction of the Washingtonians.

68 posted on 02/04/2012 10:47:33 PM PST by Rome2000 (MYTH ROMNEY IS A MORMON MELCHIDEZEK HIGH PRIEST AND RICK SANTORUM IS A DICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lwoodham
do we want Obama for four more years and teach the GOP elites that the voters matter, or do we want Romney for 8 years.

I'm for letting the communists own the collapse.

Putting the blue blood country clubbers in for another 8 years is just putting off the inevitable.

Time coming soon to hit the reset button on this Republic and wipe the slate clean, and that means taking out the Washingtonians from both parties.

Used to think that if DC were nuked by the muzzies, it would be a crippling blow.

Sick thing is that it would probably be the best thing ever to happen to the American citizen.

69 posted on 02/04/2012 10:54:18 PM PST by Rome2000 (MYTH ROMNEY IS A MORMON MELCHIDEZEK HIGH PRIEST AND RICK SANTORUM IS A DICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
I'm for letting the communists own the collapse.

After the US goes the way of the USSR.

70 posted on 02/04/2012 10:57:24 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet
What is the distinction between a Rockefeller Republican and Obama lite? Seems to me to be one and the same.

You obviously haven't the slightest idea what Obama is.

71 posted on 02/04/2012 11:00:24 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I think Reagan lost the first five primaries, but Rick and Newt each won a contest, so the race is very wide open.


72 posted on 02/04/2012 11:26:47 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

In this, you are mistaken.


73 posted on 02/04/2012 11:57:43 PM PST by dixjea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
One possibility is support the Republican candidate whomever he is solely to vote “The Divine One” out of office.

Nope. Not going to do it again.

BTW. The collapse is coming. If Willard somehow wins the presidential election he will continue the same ridiculous spending and it will happen on the Republican's watch.

74 posted on 02/05/2012 12:18:50 AM PST by vlad335
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

My wife has a friend who belongs to the LDS Church. her friend told her that she had many misgivings about Romney and that this has togo to the RNC if need be..


75 posted on 02/05/2012 12:25:48 AM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
I will vote for Paul on “Super Tuesday” in Virginia to let the establishment know I am one voter not happy with Romney as our nominee.

I do hope others in Virginia will join me in sending this message.


- - -

With the understanding that Newt and Santorum were refused participation.

I agree with your message, and suggested the same a few weeks back.

76 posted on 02/05/2012 12:27:52 AM PST by Gene Eric (C'mon, Virginia -- are you with us or against us?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

My understanding in Tennessee that write-ins are allowed but they have to be registered.

Write-ins are not allowed in VA that I’m aware of.


77 posted on 02/05/2012 2:03:13 AM PST by PowerPro (Renew - Revive - Restore * Gingrich/Palin 2012 *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

“Are “write-in” votes counted in Virginia?”

No. Not in the primary. While the law doesn’t specifically prohibit the GOP from counting write-ins, they’re not required to either. This is the same group who decided to drop Gingrich and Perry from the ballot, so I wouldn’t plan on them opting to count write-ins.


78 posted on 02/05/2012 4:17:24 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (Rand Paul for President 2016 (FR still rocks!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

I just did a search. There is a petition out for write-in votes


79 posted on 02/05/2012 4:48:06 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

I just did a search. There is a petition out in Virginia for write-in votes


80 posted on 02/05/2012 4:48:32 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson