Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KantianBurke

Roberts is guaranteed to find Obamacare UNConstitutional. Guaranteed. This article is just trying to stir the pot. Everything hinges on Kennedy, NOT Roberts. Troll author is trolling.


2 posted on 03/23/2012 3:54:48 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (REPEAL OBAMACARE. Nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Kennedy has our future economy in his hands. I hope this guy understands that. It is also patently UNCONSTITUTIONAL


7 posted on 03/23/2012 4:03:13 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

You are TOTALLY correct! 99.9% of the time it is about Kennedy. Talk about the most powerful man in the US. It is Justice Kennedy. 4-4 ties and he is the swing vote every time.


8 posted on 03/23/2012 4:04:04 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (God is watching America. He is judging America. He does not like what He is seeing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Even if Roberts did not find ObamaCare unconstitutional so what? I do not accept the premise that a single SC case alone decides whether a SC justice is therefore good or bad. One has to look at their body of work.


13 posted on 03/23/2012 4:14:57 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Page 32 of the American Bar Association magazine the article references says their poll of experts said 85% of them believe Obamacare will be upheld in full, individual mandate and everything. The poll says it will be a 6-3 decision. 64% in their poll said the case WON’T have a major impact on the presidential election.

I’m going to assume this is wishful thinking and liberal bias on the part of the “experts.”

http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/preview-healthcare.authcheckdam.pdf


17 posted on 03/23/2012 4:37:27 PM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free; KantianBurke

How much are you willing to bet that NONE at SCOTUS are changing anything. Remember they had a secret meeting with the usurper on January 14, 2009 which caused that none of the nine blackest robed on the bench will touch the NBC which Thomas told us clearly and which Sheriff Arpaio is persuing!!!

WHY do you think they dare to touch the obamaScare. He scolded at a SOTUA with loud applause from the chamber, hello???


26 posted on 03/23/2012 5:12:24 PM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Yes. This article and its author are full of crap.


34 posted on 03/23/2012 5:41:38 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln (But that's just me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

I agree. The author of the piece had nothing to write about so they come up with this hair brain story.


53 posted on 03/24/2012 9:59:34 PM PDT by MarcKMG365
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson