Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mourdock for Indiana (National Review editors endorse Richard Mourdock)
National Review ^ | APRIL 16, 2012 | The Editors

Posted on 04/16/2012 7:44:37 AM PDT by Qbert

One need not support formal term limits to recognize the existence of informal ones, and the tightening polls in the Indiana Senate Republican primary suggest voters there may be starting to think Senator Richard Lugar has been in Washington long enough.

The conventional wisdom has been that the six-term incumbent Lugar is a safer general-election bet than his opponent, state treasurer Richard Mourdock. But the primary has heretofore shown Lugar to be out of touch with Hoosiers, an institutionalized Capitol Hiller who for a spell was ruled ineligible to vote in his own primary after a local board determined he hadn’t owned a home in Indiana in three decades. Though a subsequent ruling allowed Lugar to claim a family farm as a residence, the die is cast. Lugar has become a carpetbagger in his own state.

By contrast, the low-key Mourdock’s mantra has been “capable, competent, and conservative,” a line he used last week after a fine performance in his sole debate with Lugar, and one that could describe our impression of the man after he met with National Review editors recently. Mourdock is popular in Indiana, having won reelection as state treasurer with 63 percent of the vote, and has impressed the grassroots, securing endorsements from a number of Tea Party groups and delivering a strong speech at CPAC. Like so many who have seen the light, Mourdock became a conservative in the age of Reagan; he is a successful oil geologist whose growing interest in thinkers such as Milton Friedman led him to run for Congress and eventually win county and statewide office. As treasurer, Mourdock has shown himself to be both fiscally prudent and possessed of a certain fighting spirit, most prominently when he (unsuccessfully) sued to recover $6 million the state’s pension funds had lost when the Obama administration’s auto bailouts arbitrarily rewrote a century of bankruptcy law.

The debate between Mourdock and Lugar showed that latter still has the reflexes for the kind of homer politics that goes under the name “constituent services”; he assured the audience, for instance, that he is “thinking about corn and soybean prices every day.” But after 36 years in the Senate, Mr. Lugar evinces a political philosophy so subtle that in unfavorable light it scarcely seems to exist at all. Whether it is his limp defense of ethanol subsidies (which Mourdock opposes), his cold praise of the “scholarly” Ryan plan, or his seeming unfamiliarity with his own voting record on Social Security, Lugar cut the figure of a man grown more accustomed to the backslapping of the cloakroom than to the candid back and forth of the town hall. Even on foreign policy, where he is often praised as a statesman, Lugar lacks his opponent’s clarity on the United States’ role in the world. His opposition to the surge in Iraq was poorly thought out and, ultimately, wrong, and he was a champion of the New START treaty, which was a gift to Russia.

Lugar is a decent man who has in the past been more reliable than not on a number of important conservative issues. Arlen Specter he is not. But we can do better. Mr. Mourdock strikes us, for instance, as a man who would not cast votes, as Lugar did, to confirm Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. Nor would he co-sponsor the DREAM Act, support the auto bailouts, or oppose the Vitter amendment to limit taxpayer-funded abortion, as Lugar did and does.

For these reasons we support Mr. Mourdock in the Indiana Republican primary. We think he will make a strong candidate and a good United States senator. After Lugar’s long career in Washington, Hoosiers deserve new blood and Lugar deserves a happy retirement and a gold watch. We’d be happy to spring for one.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: indianaprimary; lugar; mourdock; starttreaty

1 posted on 04/16/2012 7:44:51 AM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Well finally NRO (National RomneyCare Online) gets an endorsement right.


2 posted on 04/16/2012 7:46:25 AM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Damage control over the Romney endorsement.

Throwing a bone to the base trying to make nice.

Look for plenty of butt-kissing of the base between now and November 6th. Romney will continue to ignore us and treat us like “the help”. But, the establishment will be in full butt-kissing mode because they realize Romney has dome mucho damage and cannot win without us.

This is the first of many kisses to be planted on our backside.


3 posted on 04/16/2012 7:53:21 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Not Romney - Not ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
Washington DC corrupts about 99.9% of people who get sent there via elections.

How else can one go from a 5 digit porfolio to 7 digits in less than 2 years?

4 posted on 04/16/2012 7:53:47 AM PDT by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

I am looking forward to voting Lugar out. Time for him to head for the cornfield.

Lets hope Mourdock can resist being corrupted in DC.

In the age of communications like we have now, why do these Congresscritters need to be in Washington at all but for a few times a year?


5 posted on 04/16/2012 7:58:57 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]




Click his tootsies!

Viking Kitty is calling for monthly donors!
Donate monthly and help to end FReepathons


Sponsors will yack up $10
every time a new monthly donor signs up

6 posted on 04/16/2012 8:11:43 AM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Qbert

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7C3037GqsI

(We have to win this one)


7 posted on 04/16/2012 8:18:51 AM PDT by TheCause ("that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

*ping*


8 posted on 04/16/2012 11:41:06 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; justiceseeker93; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; RitaOK; ...

Establishment Republicans and RINOs are increasingly alarmed about Lugar’s prospects.

GO MOURDOCK!!!!!!!!!


9 posted on 04/16/2012 3:55:17 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A liberal's compassion is limited to the size of other peoples' paychecks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I have no doubt Lugar would win in November.
That’s why we must defeat him in May.


10 posted on 04/16/2012 4:06:43 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

“Mourdock for Indiana (National Review editors endorse Richard Mourdock)”

So why didn’t you check off for the editorial sidebar?


11 posted on 04/16/2012 6:09:00 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Go Richard Mourdock. Ricky L. should have retired in 2000 at the latest.


12 posted on 04/16/2012 8:24:06 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Has Mittens won one "Red State" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Great news. The FIGHT is now, or NEVER. At least they are putting one up in Indiana!

The primary is the last bastion of the PEOPLE’S VOICE.

We give ourselves four more years of Evil, or Evil Light in November, or we get behind NEWT, the only one of these guys to repent and repair.


13 posted on 04/16/2012 9:10:00 PM PDT by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt IS Galt. (& Always has been.) 1144 isn't hear, yet!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Ping


14 posted on 04/16/2012 9:36:43 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A liberal's compassion is limited to the size of other peoples' paychecks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Clintonfatigued.


15 posted on 04/17/2012 6:20:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson