Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daily Presidential (Rasmussen) Obama 47%, Romney 44%
RasmussenReports ^ | 5/21/12 | Scot Rasmussen

Posted on 05/21/2012 6:41:29 AM PDT by NE Cons

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows President Obama earning 47% of the vote and Mitt Romney attracting 44% support. Five percent (5%) would vote for a third party candidate, while another five percent (5%) are undecided.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: NE Cons

Do you work for Rasmussen? You’re not going to change my mind.

I’ve seen the term applied to both.


61 posted on 05/21/2012 9:21:56 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (We may die, but DISCO LIVES FOREVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

I admit I like Goode, even know his part of the country. My parents lived in Martinsville until my father’s death. I personally think we have bigger fish to fry this election than to put in a protest vote. We definitely need to send more like Goode to Congress and change the tone in Washington. We also have to realize what is Constitutional and what is left up to the States and the people. We too often become the left of the right in our methods. It won’t work if you want to change peoples minds and hearts.


62 posted on 05/21/2012 9:25:02 AM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (We're an Oligrachy...Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
Do you work for Rasmussen? You’re not going to change my mind

Nope. I certainly don't. And not necessarily trying to change your mind, just trying to add some clarity to some of the comments.

63 posted on 05/21/2012 9:32:39 AM PDT by NE Cons (Was a Hard-Core Perry supporter. Now Hard-Core ABO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote
As someone else mentioned on this thread... If he goes down the road of saying Obama is a good guy (he's not, he's the most arrogant POtuS I've ever seen) but misguided... he's playing the McCain game, of trying to be a nice guy

Won't work, and we'll be destroyed down the ticket. He NEEDS to hit back... HARD

64 posted on 05/21/2012 9:34:52 AM PDT by NE Cons (Was a Hard-Core Perry supporter. Now Hard-Core ABO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
We were presented the slate of candidates that we have had because that is the way that the gop/e wanted it and they worked very hard at manipulating the primary system in varying ways to accomplish their goals. Do I think that a true Conservative that is not part of the gop/e machine... beltway mentality would be polling better... by honest pollsters... yes I do. romney may very well lose to obama... and I blame prebeius and company for every single reason that this is the worst election of our lifetime.

No Conservative would ever vote for obama... but some of us cannot vote for mitt. We will vote down ballot and I have sent money to those deposing the gop/e elites... and I am sending money to Conservative candidates... but you and the gop/e can finance and drag mitt across the finish line... if romney fails... blame the leadership of the gop... for they alone have manufactured our predicament.

LLS

65 posted on 05/21/2012 9:40:17 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: A Strict Constructionist
I personally think we have bigger fish to fry this election than to put in a protest vote.

We get the same argument every four years. That argument is no longer good enough. If not now, when?

This is it. This is the line in the sand. I will no longer vote against candidates when in fact I have a candidate, like Goode, whom I can vote FOR. Besides, if you're voting for mitt, isn't that in itself nothing more than a protest vote against the fraud? Why not instead vote FOR the candidate who advances those things we are FOR.

We also have to realize what is Constitutional and what is left up to the States and the people.

Forming a political party for Constitutionalists is is a power left to the states and the people ourselves. It is a daunting enterprise, but not an insurmountable one. I tried going along with the GOPe way repeatedly to no avail.

When you try to build a Conservative structure on quicksand repeatedly and see the foundation pulled from underneath, you soon realize that it is better to move to firmer ground and start over. Right now, unless the Tea Party is ready to establish ourselves as a political party, the Constitution Party is the only firm ground around in this swamp.

66 posted on 05/21/2012 9:44:48 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (When we cease to be good we'll cease to be great. Be for Goode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
Well I agree with everything you say but fact remains that we did not have a conservative that could beat Obama in the race this go-around. Sarah Palin would have crushed Romney in the primaries regardless of the gop/e machine and would have gone on to easily beat Obama but for reasons only known to her, she didn't get into the ring.

Of the conservatives that did get into the race, well, we saw what happened. Michelle Bachmann tanked. Cain self-destructed. Santorum failed to inspire and Gingrich, well, let's put it this way, Gingrich did not have the support of conservatives, period. Take Wyoming, probably the most conservative state in the nation, Gingrich got less than 1% of the vote in their caucus. In the Deep South, where Gingrich was supposed to be strongest, with the exception of SC and GA, he fared very poorly. Conservatives just didn't support him.

67 posted on 05/21/2012 9:54:10 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
Ras was on Hannity the day before Brown's election, along with zogby.

Ras stated firmly that nothing had changed in the past week and they were holding with the numbers that stated that coakley would win... check the archives... he officially offered no poll that week... but he vocally made the statement above. Having said that... these numbers may be dead on.

LLS

68 posted on 05/21/2012 9:56:34 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

“Right now, unless the Tea Party is ready to establish ourselves as a political party”

I thought that TEA stood for taxed enough already. A group that had one goal smaller government. That leaves a lot of areas for disagreement over social issues. I personally will drink the tea and leave the social to the States. Even the TEA party movement is already being perverted to individual motives. Just my opinion as I’m a Strict Constructionist.


69 posted on 05/21/2012 10:03:06 AM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (We're an Oligrachy...Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: A Strict Constructionist
I thought that TEA stood for taxed enough already. A group that had one goal smaller government.

Agreed! That's what attracted me to joining the protests initially. I would be more than happy if we could all agree to concentrate on just accomplishing that one thing - smaller government. We can haggle over the rest, but yes, let's take on the 800lb gorilla in the room first.

70 posted on 05/21/2012 10:07:44 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (When we cease to be good we'll cease to be great. Be for Goode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: BobinIL

Welcome to Independence from the progressive republican party overlords!

LLS


71 posted on 05/21/2012 10:11:27 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
"Many FReepers have used the phrase “special sauce” regarding Rasmussen and his polls"

That's quite an ironic use of the phrase, given that "special sauce" arose from Zogby's botched call for Not-President Kerry's 300+EV victory in 2004 -- the election that Rasmussen nailed.

72 posted on 05/21/2012 10:40:24 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I didn't like any of them but I would have voted for any of them... but paul and romney. It is not that I can't hold my nose and vote. I have done that all of my life... except for Reagan. I cannot vote for an abortion loving, gay marriage supporting, big government spending, high taxes... and a gun grabbing world class liar like mitt... that is just the way that it is. I do not like it... I do not want this to be the outcome... but as you say... mitt is mitt and this election is what it is. I predict a romney defeat and WE Conservatives will once again get the blame... not the gop/e who have not only destroyed the republican brand... they have had a heavy hand themselves in the destruction of America.

LLS

73 posted on 05/21/2012 10:55:27 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: riri

I know what you mean. It would be better for everyone if the Obama supporting young people just stay home, but I was referring to the polling. They still poll the younger voters.


74 posted on 05/21/2012 11:50:21 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: BobinIL

Look,

Don’t kid yourself, Romney has shown he will be a rabid dog. Don’t think because he publicly says “don’t mention wright” that means wright won’t come into play.

Don’t be so naive.


75 posted on 05/21/2012 11:56:05 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

He’s starting a new weekly poll with a much larger sample, available at his site to paying subscribers. He acknowledged that the daily polls are more subject to news cycle swings.


76 posted on 05/21/2012 12:25:15 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NE Cons

Obama is in serious trouble. He cannot get above 42-47% even though he’s the incumbant; and Romney has just finished a difficult and rather destructive primary campaign; and Romney has not really begun to fight yet.

Wait until the s@#$ hits the fan with the HHS mandate getting wide attention in late June and early July, and old folks get wind of the fact that their medicare benefits will be rationed in order to fund contraceptives for college women (since their boyfriends do not want to pay or them). Funding promiscuity for college and post college women by cutting benefits for the older generation will not go well with the electorate.

Also - since when is it considered to be a benefit for women to turn them into prostitutes? Actually, they might at least get a job with an income if they would charge a fee for services. Maybe that is Obama’s actual goal after all. It would reduce the unemployment stats.


77 posted on 05/21/2012 1:49:58 PM PDT by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NE Cons
Rasmussen has slipped into “Hey look at me!” mode. When he does the races tighten so you keep on watching, but given the week Oabama had and the damage he did to himself with his big announcement “Hey look at me” seems to be the explanation here. Rasmussen talks to hundreds of thousands of people he knows who will say what so if he wants to put Romney down 15 points he can. Putting Obama up even 5 must have been a heavy lift. Rasmussen pulled this stunt last weekend. Her had Romney + 6 then + 7 then + 4. In a three day rolling average to get the number to drop 3 points after jumping one point he had to have gone from a + 11 for Romney to a + 2 for Romney - this was the weekend immediately after Obama’s announcement. As I said Rasmussen is in his “Hey look at me!” mode. Obama falling off the table is bad for business. Rasmussen uses only Likely voters- how many Democrats whose enthusiasm is 8 points less than Republicans did he have to call, and where did that “surge of enthusiasm” among Democrats come from?
78 posted on 05/21/2012 3:27:14 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NE Cons

Take your passive-agressive drivel somewhere else. Your lord, Rasmussen, isn’t perfect.


79 posted on 05/21/2012 5:01:52 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (We may die, but DISCO LIVES FOREVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Rasmussen nailed one election 8 years ago. And?

I see Rasmussen has a couple fanatics here on FR. Fortuantely, I’m not one of them.


80 posted on 05/21/2012 5:02:06 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (We may die, but DISCO LIVES FOREVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson