Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Posting the address of TruBlueRinos.com for those FReepers who can no longer stomach FR

Posted on 07/10/2012 2:39:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

Received yet another FReepmail message regarding the underground campaign to get disgruntled freepers to move on over to the latest anti-freeper site.

I'll save them the trouble of having their moles to do their underhanded dirty work underground.

If you're totally fed up with me and my absolute refusal to support the GOP-e's outright plunge into supporting the progressive/statist agenda and no longer wish to resist tyranny, please by all means go join the RINO squishes over on TrueBlueRINOS.com ( actual address: http://www.trueblueliberty.com ).

But when you join them, please do us all favor and don't come back. It'll save us all a bunch of grief.

Thanks for the memories. It was fun working with you when we all agreed on our pro-God, pro-Life, pro-family, pro-small government, pro-liberty causes.

By the way, those caught continuing their underground campaigns against FR will be zot on sight.

Like this guy:

-------------------------------------------------------

From Pasadena2k | 07/10/2012 1:22:46 PM PDT new

try a site at which it’s OK to discuss alternatives to Obama at least for a short period during this presidential elction season.

Many of us ( over 550 in the last two months ) spend some of our time at trueblueliberty.com

-------------------------------------------------------

Goodbye, Pasadena, we hardly knew ye.

No one appreciates moles. Filthy animals.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antifreepers; backstabbers; bluebloodrepublicans; establishment; filthyanimals; freespeech; gope; ib4tz; moles; poachers; rinosrus; trolls; truebluerinos; zot; zots4romneybots; zzot; zzzot; zzzzot; zzzzzot; zzzzzzot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 841-844 next last
To: Darksheare

There are always schmucks like that.


381 posted on 07/11/2012 9:40:45 AM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian "I once was lost, but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: livius

I agree.

I find the claim that supporting Romney gets a person zotted pretty funny. Romney people are free to post articles, voice their support, etc. But if you voice reservations about Mitt, look out!


382 posted on 07/11/2012 9:42:46 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
"***Then you won’t be voting for Romney?"

That's correct; I won't.

383 posted on 07/11/2012 9:44:29 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
"***Then you won’t be voting for Romney?"

That's correct; I won't.

384 posted on 07/11/2012 9:44:59 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

The troll quality has been truly pathetic lately.


385 posted on 07/11/2012 9:48:59 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
...we as a Country and citizens of that Country are no more important to Romney than Romania or China...

This is utterly deranged.

386 posted on 07/11/2012 10:20:35 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam; Iscool
The Romney Economy

It is arresting to imagine a Romney White House, inevitably filled with as many former Bain colleagues as each of his other public ventures have been: The ­PowerPoints, the 80-20 jargon, the clinical separation of decision-making from ideology, the detachment of those decisions from moral consequence, a persistent blind spot for people as people. It would represent the final ascension of a perfectly American type, one that has already remade the culture of business. I once asked a Bain colleague of Romney’s how Romney thought of his own core competence. “I think Mitt thinks he’s good at being Mitt Romney,” the colleague said.

387 posted on 07/11/2012 10:32:26 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Someone who has qualms over Romney is not therefore an Obama supporter, and someone who decides for themselves that Romney probably sucks less than Obama is not a conservative sellout.

Those who vociferously campaign against Romney on this site (and there are a number of such folks) want him to lose and are deliberately trying to help bring this about. If Romney loses Obama wins. Thus campaigning against Romney on this site supports Obama. It is a matter of simple logic.

That those who are ABO are selling out their conservative principles is official FR dogma, coming right from the top. For some time it was a bannable offense to say that one was voting for the GOP nominee. Now saying this merely unleashes a swarm of attackers who deride the intellect and character of any who think Obama would be worse for America than Romney and plan to vote accordingly.

These are the facts.

388 posted on 07/11/2012 10:35:10 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
"I get a little annoyed with folks who claim that this is happening here since I've never seen it once."

That is a hilarious claim, given your own history doing just that. Should I pull up examples from your recent posting history?

Go ahead and try. I don't think I've done this once.

389 posted on 07/11/2012 10:36:59 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Well done, DJ.


390 posted on 07/11/2012 10:40:03 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
I don't believe that God intended that we should give up...

Of course He doesn't. Defeatism is un-Biblical.

391 posted on 07/11/2012 10:40:30 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
This is utterly deranged.

Only to the Sheeple...Do some research like I did before you call something deranged...

If you haven't done the research, you obviously are not qualified to participate in the conversation...

392 posted on 07/11/2012 10:41:17 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailerpark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

The democrats succeed in cheating and winning elections whne they’re close, because it is the narrow window of manufactured votes which benefits them to stomp on the legitimate votes. There is a clear effrot by some to make this election as close as can be, even in blue states. Is it because there are many blue states where the Soros Spanish vote counting company will be reporting the vote results? I wonder ... and in red states, if the vote for Romney can be reduced, in those states the cheating potential becomes more viable to turn the results by cheating.


393 posted on 07/11/2012 10:41:31 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
I get a little annoyed with folks who claim that this is happening here since I've never seen it once.
Go ahead and try. I don't think I've done this once.

Okay.
Easy.
This is utterly deranged.

LOL, we don't follow Romney because of his views on American Exceptionalism, and you say it's deranged.

394 posted on 07/11/2012 10:42:08 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
You were here when we had the anti-UN culties and their pictures of white tanks rolling around Mississippi.

I seem to recall you were one of them ~ right?!

As always, you are completely wrong.

395 posted on 07/11/2012 10:45:54 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2905011/posts?page=271#271

There you knock FR because it won’t follow you into Romneyville?

Heck, here’s a link for otehrs to browse at their liesure:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:rogueyam/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change


396 posted on 07/11/2012 10:46:36 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Trisham, conservative women have always been the feminists. We have men in our lives because we want them, not out of necessity. We don’t look to a leader of any type in order to form our thoughts. We don’t step all over our men in order to succeed, nor do we need them in order to succeed. We are not afraid or ashamed of our feminine appearance and we enjoy having the door opened for us.

So yeah, another “feminist”.


397 posted on 07/11/2012 10:48:50 AM PDT by swpa_mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
Political choice is not a binary proposition. THAT is realville.

The U.S. Presidential election on November 6th, 2012 is a binary choice.

THAT is Realville.

398 posted on 07/11/2012 10:48:50 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: prof.h.mandingo
I am quietly working with others to take back the Repubs. locally, and we are succeeding. Our local Tea Party can make or break candidates in our county. And they know it. But we need time...

This is the way of reason and of true patriotism.

All of this defeatism and apocalyptic talk is for poseurs.

The tea party movement started from nothing three short years ago. At the time the leftists were rolling, talking about a "progressive realignment" that would last generations, and talking about "the death of the Republican Party".

In 2010 the tea party movement knocked the leftists right onto their butts and they haven't gotten back up yet.

However now, just because we had no attractive, unifying conservative standard-bearer step forward to run for the 2012 GOP nomination, the ABRs on this site want to declare that the greatest grassroots conservative movement of our lifetimes is finished, and the whole Republic is doomed.

Nuts!

399 posted on 07/11/2012 10:59:33 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Romney is not, nor was ever a Conservative.
He is for bannign guns, homosexual marriage, Romneycare/Obamacare.
He speaks out both sides of his mouth AND other orifices.
At the same time.

But hey, we’re supposed to just follow him, right?
And then what?
What will you say when he starts his liberal pandering AGAIN?
Will you apologize, or will you go full rabid zealot on us for opposing him just as much as we opposed Obama’s liberal actions?
The choice between two evils is still evil.

We had Conservatives in this race, people like you chased them out.
Or frauded them out of delegates, like in Florida.
And we are not suposed to notice this or say anything?
Bite me.


400 posted on 07/11/2012 11:04:21 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 841-844 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson