Posted on 07/16/2012 12:57:11 PM PDT by JimWayne
No matter who wins the election in November, a Communist will occupy the White House. However, a Romney win has an added disadvantage. It will strengthen the Communist grip over the GOP.
Right now, there is a struggle between the Tea Party and the Trotskyite neocons for the control of the GOP. If Romney is defeated, it will give a boost to the Tea Party. If he wins, it could be over for the Tea Party.
The RINO GOP establishment has opposed every Tea Party candidate and has ganged up with the Democrats whenever it seemed like a Tea Party candidate would win. It started with NY-23 and then they opposed the TP candidates in other states. In AK, when the establishment candidate lost the primaries, they ran her as an independent, but they now expect us to unite and support a Comiecare pioneer.
It is time for payback and at least save the GOP and vote against every RINO. Four more years of Obama cannot be worse than four years of Mittens, and with good candidates in the House and Senate, Obama's agenda can be blunted, but Mittens winning and strengthening the RINO grip on GOP will put America in an extremely dangerous situation.
A request to Mitt Romney supporters. Stop posting your propaganda here. Don't you get it? Mitt Romney is unwanted here.
Nope. You'll explain to your children why you voted for the Repubican president who enacted, with the support of Democrats, laws to force adoption agencies to cooperate with homosexual couples "who love each other" and want to adopt "children of their own," and who ensured that when your kids join the military, they will be forced to accommodate (in fact, punished if they express any dislike for) open homosexuality in their living spaces and chain of command.
You'll explain to your children why you voted for the Republican president who brought on nationalized health care that even "against his own wishes" (ha ha) included tax-payer funded on-demand abortion for anyone 18 or older.
You'll explain to your children why you voted for the Republican who expanded global warming regulations so extensively that America surrendered its sovereignty with regard to energy and food production and consumption to the UN because, as Romney said in his CPAC speech of '08, "Any carbon plan has to be world-wide in scope -- let's have a world-wide solution, not an American one."
You won't have to explain to your children that you helped Obama destroy their country -- you'll have to explain that you lacked the courage to stand and fight government tyranny because Obama scared you too much, so you helped Romney destroy their country instead.
I'll be voting to deny a mandate to either Romney or Obama; I'll be voting to help conservatives fight either one that wins. YOU will be voting for government tyranny and in so doing, risk a landslide victory "popular mandate" for a guy you despise, a guy who would hinder all those conservatives you'll presumably be voting for down-ticket, and a guy who would enslave your children to government tyranny advanced by the Republican party.
Yes, you'd certainly owe them an explanation.
Goodbye, bobbie, we hardly knew ye.
This is the biggest load of bilge I have ever seen. Disgusting.
That doesn't matter to people frightened into supporting the devil himself if they believe he can stop Obama and what he is doing.
Again, I have major issues with the mindset that grants the Executive the station of a Crown, whereby everyone screaming that we replace THEIR KING with our own KING. That somehow, voting for Romney STOPS what Obama will do, and has already done.
They have no clue what time it already is. But I oppose as much as I do this regime that has usurped power for itself by the consent of Congress, the Courts and half the people - the notion that we elect kings and voting for Romney for King stops Obama from ruling us.
Hey Romneybot, make up your mind - are the people who oppose the baby-killer and Commiecare creator Romney from DU, Daily Kos, Ron Paul gang, Chicago political machine or are they all funded by George Soros? These are the epithets thrown at the opponents of Commiecare that you support.
BTW, there is no Kolob either if that is what you believe.
Please, ALL of you remember one of the most powerful of the Checks & Balances the FFs wrote into the Constitution:
ALL (every single dime) of expenditure MIST be authorized by Congress. If they had any ball, they would just SPECIFICALLY disallow the Executive Branch spending ANY funds on ANY program or process that the Congress does not agree with.
This has only been done a few times, but there is precedence and it DOES work.
They really don’t have to repeal ObCare, just defund the implementation of it.
... and yet another bumbling, self-righteous Mittens shill is unceremoniously shown the door.
Awwwwww.
Just like a bad penny, Dumb shows up on every thread spouting this falsehood in order to demonize the people who refuse to vote the way he wants them to. His contempt for those who reject his "math" is EXACTLY akin to legislators stunned at the "people who don't mathematically understand" that failure to increase a standing budget is a budget "cut."
Folks, down deep, you know the truth: There's only one way for a Republican or anyone else to vote for Obama, and that's to mark his name on their ballot.
There's only one way for a Democrat or anyone else to vote for Romney, and that's to mark his name on their ballot.
There's only one way for anyone to vote for government tyranny, and thats to mark a statist's name on their ballot. A vote for Romney, like a vote for Obama, is a vote for government tyranny.
THAT, FRiends, is the math.
Cut! Print! PERFECT! ;)
Mathematically and materially false, but emotionally gratifying for those who need to demonize the folks who won't vote they way they want them to.
It is said that politics is the art of compromise.
I would say that conservatism is the art of standing your ground.
Many who think they are conservatives are fooling themselves.
They are equivocating cowards who will throw their supposed conservatism under the bus when under fire and compromise with the enemy.
They are not the ones I want at my side in battle.
They are unreliable.
Yup.
And if Obama wins he'll just gut welfare reform by presidential edict and raise the deficit even higher.
... for those suffering from ABO tunnel-vision, who think that when their candidate loses, it's because the folks who declined to vote for him "voted for the other guy even when they didn't actually mark his name on their ballot but it was the same thing because the other guy won."
Those of us free of the tunnel understand that when a candidate loses, it's because he didn't get enough votes. Period.
Well, Romney is definitely both. Anyone who can justify mass murder of innocent human life is definitely insane. And he’s a compulsive liar.
Read Jim Robinson’s take on Romney lately?
There's only one way for a Democrat or anyone else to vote for Romney, and that's to mark his name on their ballot.
You have the patience of a saint, gamely attempting to explain this basic, self-evident numerical truth to posters who -- really and truly; from all the evidence on the ground -- simply do not appear capable of grasping the baseline rudiments of electoral mathematics, ultimately.
It must be very like, one suspects, attempting to teach algebra to a grapefruit. ;)
You seriously need a psychiatrist if you think there’s no difference between Romney and Obama. And, I’m not even sure he/she could help you, your head is so far up your ideological butt. Proctologist is more like it.
Well, bob, I don't know what I said that could cause you to think I'm crazy so I'm just going to repeat my entire post again:
"Don't try to make me some sort of connoisseur of evil, savoring its various gradations. Evil is evil. Don't support it.
Reject Obama. Reject Romney. Reject all evil.
Trust God."
Sorry, bob, but that's exactly how I feel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.