Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Advice for Romney for Debate: Add Yours
10/3/12 | 1 Old Pro

Posted on 10/03/2012 6:40:23 AM PDT by 1Old Pro

Please post your ideas for Romney to WIN this debate:


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2012; pagingmittromney; romney; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last
I've been thinking about two things regarding the debate: 1) We know Obama will blame Bush for the horrible economy, he has in the past and it works. 2) Romney needs a zinger and one that will work.

My advice, use the Reagan Line the FIRST time Obama blames the previous administration - There you go again Mr. Obama, failing to take responsibility for your mistakes.

Obama will know he cannot blame Bush again during the entire debate or he throw's Romney a softball to use the line again and make it the most memorable takeaway from the debate - that Obama can't take responsibility for the horrible economy he caused.

1 posted on 10/03/2012 6:40:25 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Stay on the big themes of a society of liberty versus a society of government. Quit nit picking crap like a an ad campaign about China to win the votes of the China phobes and another one over here to win a few voters on some other issue. (not that the issue isn’t valid, just saying...)

Stay big - it’s freedom versus totalitarianism. It’s liberty versus government. Two choices.

If there is one particular issue to focus in on, its energy. Because energy effects ALMOST EVERY OTHER ISSUE so it is in and of itself a general issue as well as a specific issue.


2 posted on 10/03/2012 6:43:16 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright ("You Might Be a Liberal" (YMBAL) Coming out Sept 1 by C. Edmund Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Sidestep the moderators. Answer the questions directly in one sentence then proceed to your points.


3 posted on 10/03/2012 6:44:32 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
passion and righteous indignation at what Obama has done to us these past 4 years.
4 posted on 10/03/2012 6:45:13 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

.

Very good idea, old Pro!

________________________

If America only knew....

Will America be lost because noone had the guts to expose Obama?

The best Obama exposure site on the net:
(By our own FReeper, Beckwith)

The Obama File
http://www.theobamafile.com/index_next_personal.html

The United States Library of Congress has selected
TheObamaFile.com for inclusion in its historic collection
of Internet materials
http://theobamafile.com/LibraryOfCongress.html

Just a few of the pages:

http://www.theobamafile.com/index_next_politics.html

http://www.theobamafile.com/BarackObama.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/_family/FamilyPage.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaEducation.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaPsychology.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaReligion.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaWife.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/_associates/ObamaAssociates.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaIconography.htm

.

.


5 posted on 10/03/2012 6:45:25 AM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro; pburgh01; All

As pburgh01 said:

“he (Romney) needs something people can vote for not just the other guy besides Obama. Talk about us really pursuing our own energy, really doing it, oil exploration, oil shale, natural gas, the millions of jobs and how it can power our economy. Talk about simplifying the tax code so people can run businesses not operate businesses trying to hide from the government. Be Reaganesque, really drive home we want to increase the size of the pie, not divvy up the different pieces to voting blocks. Be positive and enthusiastic about the future, how we need to unleash the private sector, that “Partnerships” and “Investments” in the private sector lead to Solyndra.(This would blunt all of Obama’s thought speak, about his friendly Fascism, government\private sector partnerships). Drive home we need respect in the world again and to show strength, that appeasing and shaking hands and groveling at with dictators and madmen is very Un-American like.”


6 posted on 10/03/2012 6:47:59 AM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Neuter all arguments Obama makes against your record as being meaningless in the face of the problems that Obama has created for the Americans people. Also, mention Fast and Furious.


7 posted on 10/03/2012 6:48:14 AM PDT by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Mitt has yet to define his own Presidency and policies. That’s what’s been missing.

Yes, we know he can create job and Obama has lost jobs. But these bumper sticker slogans are not going to cut it. We’re beyond that. The American people need a lesson in Capitalism 101. HOW is Mitt going to created jobs? How is Mitt going to do all of the things he says will happen when Obama is gone. You and I may know this but the average American does NOT.

Mitt Romney needs to define his own policies and explain them in detail so that the American people understand them while at the same time defining Obama as a destroyer in chief.

Mark my words, even if Romney does well in the debates, if he fails to define his own policies, whatever bump he gets from the debates will fade quickly. There’s no substance to maintain a bump.


8 posted on 10/03/2012 6:48:20 AM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

Start the debate by saying

“In preparing for this debate, I’ve spent a great deal of time studying Barack in an attempt to know him better. While there are many things we just don’t know about him, one thing I’ve determined is that when he’s filtering his words, he stutters and stammers. Back when he was a younger radical, he spoke without concern of his hatred for our country and did it without stuttering. Mr. President, tonight speak without hesitation or reservation about the America you know.”


9 posted on 10/03/2012 6:49:47 AM PDT by King Hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Don’t get backed into discussing George Bush or Hurricane Katrina because of that stupid video that was released yesterday (which gave the Dems an excuse to revive the whole non-issue).


10 posted on 10/03/2012 6:50:22 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Do your level best to rattle Barry and get him off script. He is in trouble and he knows it. He is arrogant and has a VERY thin skin. He is just a gentle shove or two away from a massive on-camera meltdown that will cinch his defeat.


11 posted on 10/03/2012 6:50:36 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

.

Romney ahs a big advantage as soon as he stips out on the stage with Obama; he is tall, handsome and robust.
He looks like a president straight out of central casting.

People will compare him to the skinny, jug earred, purple lipped Obama.


12 posted on 10/03/2012 6:50:36 AM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/obamas-america-has-worse-gdp-growth-than-cuba/

thats all he needs to talk about IMHO....that and

“Mr. President...things that have happened in Libya on 911 have yet to be explained clearly to the American public. Could you use this opportunity to give us a cogent explanation of exactly what went down ?”


13 posted on 10/03/2012 6:50:58 AM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Against Obama: Have a catchy one-liner to use for each issue. It must be a strong statement that makes the media want to ask you about it later.

For Romney: Have a simple plan for the economy, jobs, foreign policy. Keep saying: Obama did x. It’s serious and terrible. But I can fix it, and stay true to our country while doing it. Here’s how (simple plan).

Keep saying the the nightmare will be over. Prosperity for all and national security are both going to rebound if I am elected.


14 posted on 10/03/2012 6:51:32 AM PDT by married21 (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

has, steps
Sorry


15 posted on 10/03/2012 6:52:03 AM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Don’t try to be a nice guy, folksy or any of that. Be a smart, rich guy businessman who can get the economy going. Your strong suit is being a strong suit.


16 posted on 10/03/2012 6:52:52 AM PDT by Hugin ("Most times a man'll tell you his bad intentions, if you listen and let yourself hear."---Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
This entry from the comments on a Yahoo! news story trying to put pressure on Romney gave me a chuckle:

Moderator: Governor Romney, Given that everybody hates you and knows you are not going to win, How will you address the deficit?

Moderator: President Obama, What is your favorite Jay Z song?

Moderator: We are rolling to commercial so Chris Matthews can hide his boner.

17 posted on 10/03/2012 6:54:51 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne (Democrats - The Treasonous Pervert Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Fairy Tale
18 posted on 10/03/2012 6:55:51 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Obama at the UN: The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Bring up Zero’s homosexual tendencies.


19 posted on 10/03/2012 6:57:49 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (ABO to the core.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

I would illuminate the potential of oil and shale production by using the “Dakota’s” as a model to lowering unemployment and raising tremendous royalty dividends that lower the tax burden for our citizens. With a national push to truly become energy independent, we will be able to modify our foreign policy to focus only on actions that are in America’s best interest. Currently we are at the mercy of the Islamic world.


20 posted on 10/03/2012 6:59:22 AM PDT by Kahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

Or better yet, take a page out of Newt’s book and humiliate the moderators. I remember when Newt got that standing ovation during the South Carolina GOP debate:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SijidSC1Quw

THIS will generate the enthusiasm that Romney needs to win.


21 posted on 10/03/2012 7:00:10 AM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Romney needs to gain control of the debate right away. The questions will be skewed in Obama’s favor. Mitt needs to reframe the question, answer it quickly and then go on the offensive with his own related question, prefacing it with something like “A better question would be....” or “Perhaps you should ask Mr. Obama....”. Even if the moderator admonishes Mitt for asking his own questions, the damage will already be done and Obama will be on his heels.


22 posted on 10/03/2012 7:09:07 AM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Romney should say his policy is to stimulate economic growth by lowering the tax burden on the private sector, eliminating growth-killing regulations, and getting more American’s back to work and out of the choom wagon.


23 posted on 10/03/2012 7:10:24 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
I say offer Obama and his supporters an olive branch for the unfair treatment given to him by the birthers by making this promise to Obama and his supporters and not breaking the promise...

"when I move into the White House the new attorney general will initiate a thorough and complete investigation in order to clarify to the American people that Barack Obama was indeed eligible and was the legitimate President of these United States. Such an investigation is only fair to not only President Obama and his legacy but also to the American people. I'm sure that the results of this investigation will provide proof that President Obama was indeed legitimately the President of the United States.

However, if by some chance the accusations turn out to be correct, there is a promise that anybody in Congress whether they be republican or democrat will be legally held accountable and justice will be served for any wrong doing and illegal activity. Let that be a warning to the leaders of Congress who have taken the oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America."

24 posted on 10/03/2012 7:10:52 AM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Hawk

very good


25 posted on 10/03/2012 7:11:59 AM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Just don’t do a “McCain” and tell everyone how good a guy 0bama is.

Make fun of his big ears....oh never mind.


26 posted on 10/03/2012 7:12:41 AM PDT by hadaclueonce (you are paying 12% more for fuel because of Ethanol. Smile big Corn Lobby,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Unless Romney STOPS being a wimp and STOPS treating obama like a in guy over his head and STOPS being the nice guy - he wont win anything.
He should pretend obama is a conservative and treat him like he treats conservatives.


27 posted on 10/03/2012 7:15:08 AM PDT by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce

Mitt needs to look straight into the camera and say “For the past 3 years President Obama has submitted a Budget for this country that NO ONE in his OWN party has voted for, so now he’s asking all of America to vote for 4 MORE years of this?


28 posted on 10/03/2012 7:15:12 AM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
Say "You betcha alot". And wink.

Seriously, This debate is about domestic issues. Romney needs to let Obama talk about his current plan for the economy and then say. That is the same "plan" you had in 2008. It didn't work and it wont work.

29 posted on 10/03/2012 7:15:27 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Why?


30 posted on 10/03/2012 7:16:26 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

My advice: Let the “pros” manage the process. The Romney team is not going to consult with this board regarding debate strategy.

If the mental masturbation gives you a warm feeling...go for it.

Otherwise...let’s tune in tonight and see what Mitt and the team have planned.


31 posted on 10/03/2012 7:16:29 AM PDT by Herodes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

Excellent post! Thanks!


32 posted on 10/03/2012 7:20:14 AM PDT by hadaclueonce (you are paying 12% more for fuel because of Ethanol. Smile big Corn Lobby,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Bad case of laryngitis, Newt to fill in.


33 posted on 10/03/2012 7:20:40 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Agree with all that you said.
Empty words like “We need to....” or “I will put Americans back to work..” without saying HOW, are meaningless.
We need to hear some specifics.

And Romney needs to use his “man parts” after he grows a pair. He needs to HAMMER Obama on ALL his failures. If there is not time for that, pick 3 big ones-

-Obamacare and the way its TAXES will hit the middle class and GUT Medicare and the current SPIKE in insurance that we are all experiencing NOW due to Obamacare.

-Fast and Furious

-Bengazi and Obama’s FAILURE to deal with terrorism.


34 posted on 10/03/2012 7:23:05 AM PDT by a real Sheila (RYAN/romney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

I agree, bring up gas prices and why Obama is to blame.

Also, parents want their kids out of the house paying their own college loans off with a real job - this will connect to women.


35 posted on 10/03/2012 7:25:18 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

ha ha ha ha!

YES!


36 posted on 10/03/2012 7:25:30 AM PDT by a real Sheila (RYAN/romney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

This is a small one..but it could resonate..ask Obama why he has avoided holding a press conference, yet has found the time to sit down with local weirdos..i.e. “pimp with a limp”..this should make Lehrer pay attention..


37 posted on 10/03/2012 7:27:10 AM PDT by ken5050 (Laura Ingraham:"If the GOP can't beat Obama in this economy; shut down the party!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Herodes
My advice: Let the “pros” manage the process. We can only hope - but sometimes we give the pros too much credit - like the pros who were supposed to protect our embassies.
38 posted on 10/03/2012 7:30:54 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan
Mitt Romney needs to define his own policies and explain them in detail so that the American people understand them

With due respect, I do not think you could be more wrong. Worrying about policy details is a left brained type B bureaucratic liberal mindset from the outset.

Besides - there is NO WAY to do that. Anyone who can "understand" them is already a Romney supporter OR a hard core leftist Obama supporter. Broad themes, liberty versus big government, is all he can do, and all he needs to do.

39 posted on 10/03/2012 7:31:58 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright ("You Might Be a Liberal" (YMBAL) Coming out Sept 1 by C. Edmund Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA
Obama is much more limited in this debate than Romney. But Obama has the moderator bias in his favor.

Obama is limited because he must stick with a strict set of talking points...Bush did it, things are much worse than I thought, blah, blah, blah.

We know Obama cannot freely speak about who he is and what he rally wants to do. He may very well end up sounding like a scripted dummy.

Romney, while not perfect, has a career, character and true American spirit he can express without being covert.

Romney...for God's sake...do not respond to the moderators or B.O. Look directly into the camera and address the American people! Deflect their stupid gotcha questions! Tell us what we need to hear...not what the moderators want to hear.

Over the course of the debate I predict Romney will appear gracious, intelligent, sincere, strong and prepared.

Obama will be revealed as shallow, petulant and boring.

40 posted on 10/03/2012 7:32:22 AM PDT by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Awgie
Over the course of the debate I predict Romney will appear gracious, intelligent, sincere, strong and prepared. Obama will be revealed as shallow, petulant and boring. I hope you're correct - It should happen as it is the truth.
41 posted on 10/03/2012 7:34:37 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA
Or better yet, take a page out of Newt’s book and humiliate the moderators. I remember when Newt got that standing ovation during the South Carolina GOP debate:

Hmmmmm...it's one thing to take a stand against John King of CNN, but tonight, it would be risky against Jim Lehrer, executive editor of PBS's "NewsHour".

Throughout the decades Lehrer has set forth a demeanor that is calm, business like, 'grandfatherly'. I would liken it to the perception Walter Cronkite had "as the most trusted man in America". Lehrer would be difficult to 'attack'.

42 posted on 10/03/2012 7:35:04 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Rumor has it that Obama is going to keep asking Romney to provide specifics on his tax plan. The first time Obama addresses him directly with a question, Romney should point at the moderator and say “I'm answering his questions, not yours. If you would like to become a moderator, You'll get your chance after you lose the election.”
43 posted on 10/03/2012 7:45:48 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
You have two options:

1) Stay the course...

2) Get Real...


44 posted on 10/03/2012 8:12:33 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

My only advice to Romney is to get the thought of Obama being a nice guy out of his head. Obama is NOT a nice guy. If he could, he would have all of us who support the Constitution locked up, never to be heard from again.


45 posted on 10/03/2012 8:15:28 AM PDT by anoldafvet (One million people attended Obama's inauguration, 14 of them missed work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Romney needs to appeal to the emotions of the voters. Sounds silly, but it was one of the keys to why 0bama won in 2008. His loosey goosey hopey changey stirred the emotions of people who don’t pay attention to the details of the political system because they are engrossed in “real housewives of somewhere.”

If Romney gets into detailed technical solutions for the political issues of the day, as Republicans do, then 0bama can say something that sounds good but means nothing and it will resonate with the undecided squishy center.

Appeal to the emotions of the lowest common denominator!


46 posted on 10/03/2012 8:23:22 AM PDT by BradyBug (Holy Rolling Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

First, some assumptions:

1) This debate will be watched mostly by people already interested in politics, including many independents who are leaning Obama’s direction. Those watching could, however, favorably influence friends who aren’t interested enough to watch.

2) Reporters from the MSM will be looking for anything they can portray as a Romney gaffe, as they did on his foreign trip, and have been doing since.

3) Many of those independents leaning toward Obama have heard little of what most of us on the right consider to be outright scandals perpetrated by this administration, including (but definitely not limited to) Fast & Furious, stimulus funds going heavily toward Obama bundlers, the recent Libyan debacle, and, most important of all, his outright disrespect for our laws.

Given the above assumptions, I believe Romney should respectfully address the Independent voters in the audience and tell them that he was going to spend his time informing them of actions Obama has taken over the past four years that they might not be aware of, and that the reason they might not be aware of them is because the mainstream press (and call them out by name) has not done its job for the past four years. The intent should be to inform swing voters while putting the MSM on the defensive, giving them less time to play offense, which they will surely do otherwise.

In other words, address the Independent voter and attack the press. Start with a simple statement that many of you have very likely never heard of Fast & Furious, or about how the Obama administration invoked executive privilege to prevent a Congressional investigation from determining how high into the administration knowledge of the program went. Add that they sent one person involved in it to Iraq to spend his time out of the reach of U.S. reporters, who, incidentally, show little inclination to attempt to locate him. Then point out that Hispanic voters, unlike most Independent voters who rely upon NBC, ABC, CNN, etc., for their news “coverage” (if you can call it that) were recently treated to extensive coverage of Fast & Furious by not ABC, or CNN, but by Univision. Yes, Hispanic voters, and most Mexicans, are now more informed about Fast & Furious than you are as Independents, because Univision did its job.

Sum up with: “Tonight, I am going to ask you to listen as I describe, at every opportunity, facts, not opinions, but facts, that have been withheld from you by your typical, in-the-tank-for-Obama, news sources. When I am done with this debate, those same sources will likely go stark raving crazy in attempting to disprove everything I assert here tonight, but I intend to stick to direct, provable facts. And I believe that, when you realize how much has been withheld from you by your traditional news sources, you will begin to realize why so many of us think that the future direction of our country, and of our children and our grandchildren, depends upon your discovery of what the present administration has been doing these past four years.”

In other words, tell the American people, especially the swing voters, exactly what they’ve not been told by the MSM, and drag the MSM’s name through the mud at the same time. The objective should be to make them realize that they’ve been intentionally misled, and to know, name by name, exactly who has done that to them. Go after the MSM with a vengeance.

Oh, and call out Jake Tapper, Shirley Atkisson, and Univision as a whole, as exceptions to the rule. They’re the only ones that have gone off the liberal MSM reservation in all this.

Then, as the questions proceed, focus on one group after another, from working women, to single women, to union members, to Hispanics, to blacks, etc., pointing out a law ignored, or a policy enacted, that they have likely heard nothing of, but which directly, and unfavorably, affects them directly. There’s certainly no lack of material.

Yes, even blacks. How many black Americans know that Obama doesn’t support the DC voucher program, a program supported by most black parents in DC, for example? Given that, what chance is there that he will actually try to improve the lot of center-city blacks? For that matter, what has he accomplished in the four years he’s had already? And why aren’t you hearing about his position on the DC voucher program? That’s right. You’re getting your news from the “in-the-tank-for-Obama” media. (After using that phrase once or twice, keep using it, but start making quote signs with his fingers as he says it.)

Alinsky: Ridicule works. And the MSM is fully deserving of outright ridicule today. Use this debate, and only this debate, to heap ridicule where it belongs, on the people who’ve abdicated their responsibility to keep the public informed. (I say “only this debate” because it will work once, but will be viewed as piling on if used in the next debate. Gingrich scored once, but failed when he tried it again.)

By the way, I know it’s ludicrous to expect Romney to read threads like this. It’s not, however, ludicrous to expect his staff to read it. In fact, I would expect it, so I don’t think time is wasted putting forth ideas here. One just might stick.


47 posted on 10/03/2012 8:24:25 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

To “win” the debate he needs to inject the post-debate commentators with truth serum. We all know the media grades these things with even less objectivity than that of an East German judge at the Olympics.

In lieu of that, Romney needs to show passion. Show that he is a fighter and really wants to win the Presidency. Ironically, with the media saying for weeks now that Obama has this election in the bag, that actually affords Romney the opportunity to be aggressive without coming across as a bully, since people expect underdogs to be scrappy.

Yet he needs to avoid looking like he did in some of the Republican debates, where at times it seemed like he wanted to throttle his opponents. Hopefully he can adopt more of a Giuliani style: hit hard but do so in a likeable way.

Specifically, he needs to remind people again and again that just about everything Obama promised 4 years he would do as President he has failed to do even though his own party controlled the House and Senate his first two years, an advantage not many Presidents have enjoyed in recent decades. He then needs to ask why voters should trust Obama’s new promises when he failed to deliver on his old ones.


48 posted on 10/03/2012 8:26:27 AM PDT by Humbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Just remember you are debating a Con Man, and all those asking the questions are in on the Con.


49 posted on 10/03/2012 8:27:23 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Bring up obama encouraging companies to break the law requiring them to notify workers 60days before a layoff, just to hide the issue until after the election. It shows how hypocritical Obama is in his “support” of workers.


50 posted on 10/03/2012 8:36:18 AM PDT by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson