Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Were they hiding anything at the Benghazi embassy that we need to know about?
10/31/12 | Republicanprofessor

Posted on 10/31/2012 5:50:32 AM PDT by Republicanprofessor

Was the Administration hiding something at the Benghazi embassy? It seems to me that the Benghazi scandal may not just be that the administration was not helping our men in trouble over there, but that they were working hard to keep Americans away from the compound. Why? Was there something they were hiding at that embassy?

SEALS Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were told not to go help Ambassador Stevens, and they are certainly heroes because they went anyway, saved the lives of thirty embassy workers and lost their lives in the process.

General Ham was going to offer help to Ambassador Stevens even after being told not to do so. He was summarily relieved of his job less than a minute after he made that offer. There was military support less than two hours away; were they also forbidden to help?

It seems to me that the Administration was actively working to keep Americans from the Benghazi compound. Why? What were they hiding? Does it go beyond incompetence?

I had thought the rumors of gun-running were far-fetched, and maybe I have been looking at too many TV shows like Sons of Anarchy, but two warehouses do seem to suggest something going on. Then again, if there were guns in the warehouses, why did they not use them to defend themselves?

From http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2012/10/29/beyond-impeachment-benghazi/?singlepage=trueFrom

Lyons adds, citing a Clare Lopez article at RadicalIslam.org, "…that there were two large warehouse-type buildings associated with our Benghazi mission. During the terrorist attack, the warehouses were probably looted. We do not know what was there and if it was being administrated by our two former Navy SEALs and the CIA operatives who were in Benghazi. Nonetheless, the equipment was going to hardline jihadis."

What else is the Administration hiding? Was there an operation in Benghazi that we know nothing about and that the administration is working actively to conceal? These are only some of the questions we need answered.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: benghazi; shadowwars; threatmatrix; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Izzy Dunne

Just an amazing lack of curiosity by the media..... Where is Wikileaks??


41 posted on 10/31/2012 7:55:45 AM PDT by ptsal (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

Great questions all. Ping for reference.


42 posted on 10/31/2012 8:22:32 AM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

I have been asking that as well since the second day after the bombing and a Reuters article talked about how many people had to be evacuated. I think I have read somewhere that most (CIA personnel) have been scattered around the world. I know one person was in Walter Reed. The Lamb lady testified that she was one the phone with these people the entire time. They knew exactly what was going on.


43 posted on 10/31/2012 8:31:39 AM PDT by gulf1609
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

Great questions all. Ping for reference.


44 posted on 10/31/2012 9:02:34 AM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

I believe this is the original source of this story about General Ham:

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1621.htm

It’s by a propagandist for Russia - Sorcha Faal. She’s pretty famous for generating panic in kookville with tales of some facts woven with a lot of nonsense. Even most of the kookiest kooks know not to beleive her/his articles because they have been stung so many time. Faal put the derangement in the Bush Derangement Syndrome. The source for the shocking information is often said to be from “the Kremlin” as it is for this story.

Just so you know.


45 posted on 10/31/2012 10:14:20 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

Why do you describe Navy SEALS being involved?


46 posted on 10/31/2012 10:29:39 AM PDT by ansel12 (Vote, but don't pretend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noamie

How did the AFTER of the fire fight happen? Something/someone stopped the terrorists and made them go home. Who, when, how?


47 posted on 10/31/2012 10:38:26 AM PDT by Hanna548 (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Noamie

But I saw a story, with video, showing the plane, supposedly carrying those rescued AND the bodies of the Ambassador and the other 3.


48 posted on 10/31/2012 10:40:34 AM PDT by Hanna548 (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I don’t think the SEALS were involved with any conspiracies. They were brave enough to come to Stevens’ rescue when called, despite being told not to go. I’m just asking questions about what doesn’t make sense, and I’m glad that others opened more questions on this thread.


49 posted on 10/31/2012 10:56:17 AM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
The Obama Administration blocked the FBI from going to Benghazi after the slaughter.

Why would Obama block the FBI from investigating Benghazi?

The Obama/Chicago Administration wanted control over evidence'. Obama said it was 'too dangerous' for the FBI to go to Benghazi - while watching CNN sift through the wreckage finding diaries etc.

It was NOT too dangerous. That was a lie.

I'm guessing the administration wanted certain kinds of evidence found - evidence that might not have been there at the time of the slaughter.

We'll know 'the evidence' is a lie when the New York Times and Washington Post jump up and DISCOVER Benghazi just in time to help the Obama campaign.

Watch for it.

50 posted on 10/31/2012 10:57:04 AM PDT by GOPJ ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbOuxqK2T34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
The Obama Administration blocked the FBI from going to Benghazi after the slaughter.

Why would Obama block the FBI from investigating Benghazi?

The Obama/Chicago Administration wanted control over evidence'. Obama said it was 'too dangerous' for the FBI to go to Benghazi - while watching CNN sift through the wreckage finding diaries etc.

It was NOT too dangerous. That was a lie.

I'm guessing the administration wanted certain kinds of evidence found - evidence that might not have been there at the time of the slaughter.

We'll know 'the evidence' is a lie when the New York Times and Washington Post jump up and DISCOVER Benghazi just in time to help the Obama campaign.

Watch for it.

51 posted on 10/31/2012 10:57:29 AM PDT by GOPJ ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbOuxqK2T34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gulf1609

I found this:

Evacuation

The bodies were taken to Benina International Airport and flown to the capital, Tripoli, and scheduled to fly to a U.S. airbase in Germany. From Germany, the four bodies arrived at Andrews Air Force Base near Washington, DC, where President Barack Obama and members of his cabinet held a ceremony in honor of those killed.

After the attack, all diplomatic staff were moved to the capital, Tripoli, with nonessential personnel to be flown out of Libya. Sensitive documents remained missing, including documents listing the names of Libyans working with the Americans, and documents relating to oil contracts.


52 posted on 10/31/2012 11:07:46 AM PDT by Hanna548 (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

Thanks for letting me know about the source of the General Ham story. I’ll have to be more careful next time.


53 posted on 10/31/2012 11:41:31 AM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

You missed my point, there were no “SEALS” there, an Air Force veteran and two Navy veterans were there, the Navy were ex-SEALS, but not active duty, nor was the Air Force man.

People have backgrounds but THE SEALS were not there and it is misleading to say they were, Obama did that and led us to believe that the US military was protecting Stevens.


54 posted on 10/31/2012 12:22:15 PM PDT by ansel12 (Vote, but don't pretend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Yeah. And the Ambassador’s diary was there to be found by CNN four days after the fact....


55 posted on 10/31/2012 12:30:12 PM PDT by gundog (Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hanna548

Found it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/world/africa/attack-in-libya-was-major-blow-to-cia-efforts.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

“Complicating the investigation, the officials said, is that many of the Americans who were evacuated from Benghazi after the attack are now scattered across Europe and the United States. It is also unclear, one of the officials said, whether there was much forensic evidence that could be extracted from the scene of The attacks”


56 posted on 10/31/2012 12:46:47 PM PDT by gulf1609
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson; All

http://waznmentobe.com/politics/an-admiral-and-a-general-relieved-of-command-in-the-same-week.html

TWO top brass fired within minutes of expressing intention not to obey the ‘stand down”?

They are covering up far more than we are likely to ever know...


57 posted on 10/31/2012 2:49:51 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

the Navy seals conection -

http://waznmentobe.com/politics/an-admiral-and-a-general-relieved-of-command-in-the-same-week.html


58 posted on 10/31/2012 2:51:23 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

See post 54, I wasn’t describing the entire area, just the men with Stevens.


59 posted on 10/31/2012 3:11:32 PM PDT by ansel12 (Vote, but don't pretend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

See post 54, I wasn’t describing the entire area, just the men with Stevens.


60 posted on 10/31/2012 3:15:33 PM PDT by ansel12 (Vote, but don't pretend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson