Posted on 11/18/2012 4:05:03 PM PST by lowbridge
Lets not jump to any rash conclusions here. Probably is a very simple and rational reason for this.
There were a ton of ballot questions, so perhaps this precinct decided to use index cards for their ballots, and thus each of these 7 voters used 128.6 cards to complete their ballot!
He ran out there so fast it was jaw-dropping.
Probably was relieved in many ways.
This is a job for someone with fire in the belly, so much opposition esp from the propaganda press
Democrats have been perfecting voter fraud for years.
Read the 1880 case of Paul vs. Shibell.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_A._Shibell
This is also Federal Grand Jury, State Grand Jury, or State Attorney General material. As everyone here is thinking I’m sure, what has happened in other precincts? How many other Democrats won seats in the House of Representatives with similar suspicious voting numbers?
Will St Lucie SoE have the courage to certify election results with 900 votes in precinct 93 with only 7 registered voters or will the SoE clean this aberration up before certifying them???
LOL....... Heck according to the first published reports only 6 of the 7 voted and they voted 3 for west and 3 for Murphy.
I bet they have the 900 screw up corrected before they published the final results.
Page 22:
http://www.slcelections.com/Pdf%20Docs/2012%20General/GEMS%20SOVC%20REPORT.pdf
“I’m currently looking into this for a story, and I can’t find anything to back up what Tim Edison is saying. As far as I can tell, this “900 voters” thing is made up.”
I think the 900 voters was the number tallied in the recount. It’s probably why they would not finish the certification of the votes at noon like they were supposed to. If they did they could be responsible for certifying voter fraud so they claimed the machine jammed at the last minute and they could not finish certifying the recount. As far as where the 900 number came from, there were vote counting observers and they mayhave released this number.
The election board claimed that Murphy won in the recount, but if there were discrepancies such as 900 votes in one precint with only 7 registered voters, they knew they could not certify the recount without putting themselves in voter fraud jeopardy.
The above is just a guess. I don’t know where the number came from either.
But "HE" has a nice Tan!
Pima County Communists come up with a “lost load” every now and then.
Brewer did a good job as Sec of State and Ken B. is doing a good job. Purcell is doing a good job in Maricopa County.
This needs to be done every election we lose.
every single time.
AllenWest4Congress@AllenWest4Congr
#AllenWest Calls MUST be placed to Gov Scott Monday! Please call 850-488-7146 or fax 850-487-0801 regarding this travesty.
Why were we never told of this and how can a retired judge come back after retirement to renew it?
Because the monkeys have eaten all the bananas.
Someone needs to be sentenced to a lot worse than that!
Are you talking about Boehner, Cantor, or both?
“Murphy won the most precincts in St. Lucie County, with 43 favoring him, while West picked up 20. They tied 3 — 3 in precinct 93 at the Golden Ponds Recreation Center on Golden Pond Drive in Fort Pierce.”
http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2012/nov/07/no-headline-—tc_sl_precinct_numbers/?print=1
h/t
Neidermeyer
Absentee ballots are just as problematic. Ballots can be intercepted by SEIU workers at post offices. SEIU workers in most states count the ballots. Presumably, observers are allowed in the counting rooms, but the reality is otherwise. Absentee ballots are controlled by SEIU employees. Does anyone believe they will expose the fraud in their unions and precincts, denying their families income, health-care, and retirement.
Our voting system was once verifiable. It wasn't perfect. Ballots were counted in precincts in full view of other precinct workers, at least one from each party. The vote in the precinct was the official vote. Ballots were moved from the counting table into secure and numbered storage boxes, and were moved under guard, again, representing major parties, to storage vaults, never to be opened without a court order.
We have no idea how our voters voted. There is no end of clever techniques to defraud our citizens and redistribute the income generated by our private sector, but without fixing the process, local counts, paper ballots, validating voter's identities, citizenship, health status (dead or alive), will mean nothing. Voting in the US is a tragic joke. It is completely unverifiable.
Fortunately, one of our few legislators with integrity, Allen West, is doing what he can to expose some of the fraud. Without secured paper ballots he can never determine what the vote in his districts actually was, but he may be able to show that the numbers presented by the election board are fraudulent. Most states have problems, but the ridiculous over-counts in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Wisconsin, Florida, and even New Mexico, should have caused congress to invalidate votes from those states.
It is an old problem, but one which is now destroying what remains of representative government.
Tip of the iceberg.
If it becomes obvious that Obama won because of this type of fraud, there will be an uprising. Maybe Secession.
“If it becomes obvious that Obama won because of this type of fraud,”
There needs to be probable cause then indictments and arrests.
Even then, what does it say in the Constitution about removing presidents? Vote fraud is not among the options, and if it were you’d need to show that The 0ne was involved. There are no provisions for a recount after the election is certified, which is a state-by-state function.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.