Posted on 11/29/2012 4:08:49 AM PST by reaganator
A sitting President of the United States not only failed to attempt a rescue of four Americans who were tortured, sodomized and murdered in Benghazi, Lybia he did nothing even though the military was staged and ready to act. Here's the plan; "We'll send UN Ambassador Susan Rice out to promote the false fact that this attack on America occurred because of a spontaneous demonstration, we have an election to win and we've been touting our success and the defeat of our enemies. When the true facts come out later, we'll leak that we are considering nominating Susan Rice for Secretary of State. The news talk will then be all about this and not about the impeachable offense of the intentional nondefense of an American Ambassador and 3 other Americans. We specifically picked Susan Rice for this because she is black and a woman so we can play up the "attacking a black woman" theme, this will keep them talking for a long time about Susan Rice and not about Obama's nonaction in Lybia in defense of Americans."
Well, the Clinton Obstruction of Justice scandal was bigger than Watergate but that man had absolutely no honor.
The “voters” are over it. They’re too busy shopping.
Obama needs to answer for why he arranged the attack on the compound in Benghazi.
The lesson from the Clinton Obstruction of Justice scandal was learned well. The distraction then was Monica Lewinsky. Even to this day the staunchest conservatives refer to the attempt of a sitting President to fix an American court case as the “Monica Lewinsky affair”.
And they continue to trot Clinton out as if he is an honorable man, he was even the lead campaigner for Comrade Obama! You cannot make this stuff up!
Come on now! If you have anything backing up that Obama arranged the attack on Benghazi, share it now or drop it.
The majority of voters don’t see a downside to Obama’s presidency. Simple as that.
Steely Tom, so what!? This is a nation that is NOT ruled by the will of the people but rather governed by the rule of law. It matters not if Obama received 90% of the vote if he is outside the law.
Why are the Republicans talking about Susan Rice and not Obama concerning Benghazi?
Go study Watergate... it starts slowly... the press ignores it... but then drip drip drip... it is coming... it takes time.
LLS
In the Garden, Eve was challenged .. "Yea, hath God said?" .. and because of human frailty and weakness (I know, it's deeper and more theological than that) .. she fumbled with her brain, logic and the truth and ended up in a lie.
Satan uses the same tactic over and over again to accomplish his goals and in politics, we, the masses, get bombarded with gazillions of pieces of datum that are all inter-related but not so clear as a stand alone.
So when the question is asked .. "Yea, is that what it says?" .. we do no better than Eve.
I appreciate FR because there are minds and disciplined people here that can make heads and tails out of a lot of stuff and can research or categorize information that .. at least in my case, .. I couldn't do myself.
How does zero get away with his shit?
The same as any hustler does ... confuse, obfuscate and question the thoughts of the inquirer followed by .. "I guess he ain't so bad after all"
“””Go study Watergate... it starts slowly... the press ignores it... but then drip drip drip... it is coming... it takes time.
LLS””””
That will NEVER happen against a democrat dictator.
The passage of time only favors Obama concerning Benghazi.
All I know is that this is the second time Americans have died so Obama could use it as an attack on the constitution.
That’s outright treason in my book.
“Why are the Republicans talking about Susan Rice and not Obama concerning Benghazi?”
Fear and cowardice. Surely you remember the clinton fbi files. You think obama doesn’t have ammo to use on these corrupt bastiches? Besides that, mccain and graham are just as guilty of getting weapons to terrorists in Libya as obama is.
Please note, (and I post this periodically in case people don’t get it,) I NEVER capitalize anything or anyone’s name I don’t respect. Not even at the beginning of a sentence.
What's infuriating is that if Benghazi had happened on a Republican president's watch the MSM would be going out of its mind. First president since Carter to lose an Ambassador to terrorism. Leaving the Seals to die, watching the whole thing unfold on video.
Add to that the fact that it happened on the anniversary of 9/11 — and that it was two months before a close election — and the MSM would be screaming about it 24-7. American honor lost, Americans don't leave other Americans to die, interviewing the flag officers, interviewing the parents, interviewing the survivors. A full-court press, wall-to-wall.
They both got away with it for reasons that should be obvious.
0 got a free pass from the media which apparently doesn’t care about people getting murdered.
Half of the American public is brain-dead and can not handle a complicated thought like “0 refused to show force so as not to annoy his buddies, and blamed the murders on anger over a Youtube video.”
What is it about these Muzzies that as soon as they storm the gates, the first thing they want to do is torture and Sodomy? I would be looking for code books or explosives or weapons. But with these guys, Sodomy is always Job One.
The passage of time only favors Obama concerning Fast and Furious. Just replace Benghazi with the next one and we can move on, and on, and on......
because he is half black, she is black and they are both libs.
100% protected.
Too many people know what happened and if it were not for the bought and paid for trent lott... there would have been no clinton II.
LLS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.