Skip to comments.Three So Called ‘Reasonable’ Policy’s Leading to National Gun Registration
Posted on 03/14/2013 2:31:39 PM PDT by EXCH54FE
Colorado -(Ammoland.com)- The most dangerous phase in the fight to defeat the gun grabbers all-out assault on our Second Amendment freedoms is upon us.
Im talking about the gun grabbers Plan B alternative a triple threat designed to sound more reasonable to the public than a total gun ban.
After I explain why this Plan B triple threat is so dangerous, I need you to take IMMEDIATE action and forward this article to every pro-gun person you know and ask them to help fight back as well.
The Plan B alternative has three components: Fictitious gun trafficking legislation, so-called mental health screenings and expanded background checks.
Gun Trafficking So-called Gun trafficking is the gun grabbers latest scheme, and its flying fast under the radar.
The ultimate goal is to hand Obamas ATF goons the power to terrorize gun owners via sting operations, and get gun owners to start screaming for a national gun registry.
Theres Senator Patrick Leahys so-called Stop Illegal Trafficking in Firearms Act of 2013 (S. 443) and Kristin Gillibrands Gun Trafficking Prevention Act (S. 179) in the Senate, and then theres the Scott Rigell/Carolyn Maloney Gun Trafficking Prevention Act (H.R. 452) in the House.
More properly referred to as the Forced Gun Owner Registration Act, S. 443 imposes harsh sentences on gun owners up to 15 years in prison for buying a firearm to sell our give a prohibited person.
Already, 150,000 of our nations veterans are considered prohibited just because they acknowledged stress on returning from war.
So just buying a shotgun for a son returning home from Afghanistan - so you could spend some time in the woods together hunting like the old days -could be enough to land you in jail for 15 years.
(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...
And you and I both know so-called gun registration is the first step toward TOTAL GUN CONFISCATION!
Repeat until the murder rate declines 50%~
Oh, and leave everybody else alone. BTW, no need to do that body cavity search on Feinstein ~
F_Stein? hee hee hee
Once you cede control, it will be gone forever and the control will get tighter and tighter.
“When They Pry Them From My Cold,Dead,Hands”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by what Constitutional authority does the fedgovt regulate or restrict or limit or do anything at all with arms sales or ownership rights of American citizens?
Yep. And remember the 2nd amendment is a Right granted by God not Government or Men.
Free Men Need Not Ask Permission.
Policy’s what? What belongs to policy?
Is that anything like ‘reasonable policies’?
Progressives today are communists plus their Saul Alinsky motto is to never let a good tradegy/crisis go to waste.
This gun grab cannot be done if the Republican House refuses to allow it.
Ever Republican Congressman must be emailed, faxed, written to and told he/she will be voted out if they let this pass.
If and when the penalty for possessing a semi-auto “prohibited” weapon is the same as possessing a full-auto “prohibited” weapon, the choice will be clear.
It’s the classic Hegelian Dialect. The outcome has already been determined.
The E-pubs bitched and moaned to put up a good fight but did nothing after, Hell, they are even funding it without a whimper. These people are cut from the same cloth. The only thing they are fighting over is who is going to be in charge when it is over.
Only someone with totalitarian plans would try to make laws like this.
Progressives have always been communists. The Progressive Movement was an emulation of the worker’s revolution in Russia in the early 20th century.
Suits them to a T and they read it as the other more positive word.
Sorry to bother you, but there is an issue with the link I think.
Nelson T. ‘Pete’ Shields
Founder of Handgun Control, Inc.
“I’m convinced that we have to have federal legislation to build on. We’re going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily given the political realities going to be very modest.
Of course, it’s true that politicians will then go home and say, ‘This is a great law. The problem is solved.’ And it’s also true that such statements will tend to defuse the gun-control issue for a time.
So then we’ll have to strengthen that law, and then again to strengthen that law, and maybe again and again. Right now, though, we’d be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a slice. Our ultimate goal total control of handguns in the United States is going to take time.
My estimate is from seven to ten years. The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors totally illegal.”
-Pete Shields, Chairman and founder, Handgun Control Inc., “A Reporter At Large: Handguns,” The New Yorker, July 26, 1976, 57-58
“Yes, I’m for an outright ban [on handguns].”
-Pete Shields, Chairman emeritus, Handgun Control, Inc., 60 Minutes interview
IN the mid 1980s, HCI decided to push for a BAN on certain rifles and shotguns.
“Sorry to bother you, but there is an issue with the link I think.”
No problem, yes there is some sort of problem/issue. I’m not sure what the problem is, article went into the “black hole” just after I posted on FR.
someone with more knowledge needs to provide assistance, I sure cannot!!(I can find the keyboard on most good days):-)
Yep - and they used to whittle away with an ice pick. These days they are trying to use jack hammers.
“this is how they do it” bump...proppressives, indeed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.