Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Toomey-Manchin Proposal Will Allow Doctors to Block Your Right to Guns
Red State ^ | 4/10/2013 | Erick Erickson

Posted on 04/10/2013 11:40:05 AM PDT by rmlew

I just talked to someone familiar with the Toomey-Manchin proposal who raises a serious concern based on his understanding of the legislation.

Everyone on all sides agrees that we need better help for those with mental health problems who need treatment.

Unfortunately, the person I talked with is concerned that the Toomey-Manchin proposal could discourage people from getting help.

The proposal will allow a doctor to add a patient to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) without ever telling the patient he or she has been added.

There would be no due process requirement. Not all doctors will be able to do it with the same ease, but many will. Knowing a doctor could add him to a federal database as mentally ill without his knowledge could potentially dissuade a patient from going to the doctor in the first place to get help.

Worse, if the doctor does so and makes a mistake, the patient would have to actively work through the system to get himself removed — guilty before being proven innocent. In some states, should a doctor flag you as having mental illness without your knowledge, you may very well see the state come collect your previously purchased guns.

Activist mental health providers will probably be overly aggressive in adding people to the list. Give it five years in liberal areas and people who believe in the physical resurrection of Christ will probably get automatic entry onto the list.

Mental health is a serious issue and the Toomey-Manchin legislation could have negative consequences. Worse, it would still not stop a Columbine, a Newtown, or the daily massacres in Chicago.

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; gunrights; manchin; secondamendment; toomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Cricket24
Soooo....I suppose if you have a concealed carry permit, they will go back through your medical records AND if they find that xanax was presribed for you, you will lose that ccp and maybe your guns? I was prescribed xanax twice for flying but they won’t know that. I used one both times. I didn’t think it helped at all so I threw both of the prescriptions out but they won’t know that. WE are SCREWED with this legislation. I just can’t tell you how damn mad I am at Sen Toomey. That Blankety blank. I will do anything I can to help him get defeated in his next primary election. I just hope to God we can find someone decent to take his place!! Then there’s Joe Manchin who has been selling the coal miners in his state out for YEARS BUT they keep voting for the SOB! They might think about that now.

West Virginia is like Murtha's district here in PA but on steroids. Murtha, like Manchin, sees his people as below him and useless idiots so he give them goodies with one had and hits them with the others. It is like the Stockholm or "Battered Wife" Syndrome, the people gets screwed but they still vote for the jagoff.

If Toomey does not wise up, we have what I call the "Charlie Brown/Lucy Syndrome" with the football. She says that she will not pull it away and even promises but she still does. When will Toomey and many others learn that? I'm wondering if he is paying Toomey off or he has something on him? I'm going conspiratorial here but other than that, how can I explain it?
61 posted on 04/10/2013 1:27:17 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Whitey, I miss you so much. Take care, pretty girl. (4-15-2001 - 10-12-2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends

Please Help FR Complete THIS FReepathon THIS Month!

Contribute Today, no matter the amount.

62 posted on 04/10/2013 1:28:08 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest
No use voting anymore. People always said this is where they would draw the line. Yeah right. Just kicking the can down the road. The fight is over.

I don't think it is but like you, it seems like voting does not work either. The only other thing I could suggest is if someone is charged with a crime under these new laws, if you are selected for a jury (or try to be selected) when the jury vote comes, vote to acquit. Use jury nullification if you can convince the others to see your way or if not, at least cause a mistrial.

We have four boxes:

Soap Box: well, they got the media for the most part. With the exception of AM talk radio (and some FM) and the internet, sans Facebook, we lost that one.

Ballot Box: Too many low info and welfare sheeple out there along with some fraud. We lost there.

Jury Box: We can't count on the Supremes anymore but jury nullification is all we have left. Our last hope before????

Cartridge Box: God, I hope not, but we are being forced into a corner here. As we all know, if you corner an animal, be it a tiger or even a day old baby chick, well, nothing to lose, everything to gain, they'll come out fighting.
63 posted on 04/10/2013 1:39:30 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Whitey, I miss you so much. Take care, pretty girl. (4-15-2001 - 10-12-2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
I guess I'll have to let my doctor know
the consequences of being a Quisling.
64 posted on 04/10/2013 2:04:10 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

To be a loyal opposition to this is to collaborate, for what we face is a non-violent revolution. It must be met with a determined but non-violent counter-revolution. Our battlefields are the hearts and minds of our fellow citizens, the halls of governance, the institutions of education, finance, and industry and the media.

A president elected with a majority of less than 6% has no mandate to shred the Constitution, to enslave and indoctrinate our children under the rubric of mandatory community service, to declare what when and how political opinions may be discussed, to nationalize healthcare or the automobile industry, or to elect a new voting demographic. Our duty is to say no to Vichy Republicans and the collaborationist loyal opposition. Our duty is to the vanguard of a peaceful counterrevolution.

65 posted on 04/10/2013 3:12:33 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, ...

When elected officials and bureaucracies act outside the law they are simply lawbreakers. When the majority of the people vote in favor of total lawlessness in the highest offices they are withdrawing their consent to be governed by a constitutional government. (however slim the majority) By what legitimate basis does the United States of America, as a Constitutional republic, still exist?

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

'The People' no longer support that. They voted in support of lawlessness from the highest office on down. They voted against the rule of law. By referendum we now have a banana republic. The USAINO.

66 posted on 04/10/2013 3:31:27 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

“Our duty is to the vanguard of a peaceful counterrevolution”

THEY are the counterrevolution, WE are original Revolutionaries of America 1776 !

67 posted on 04/10/2013 3:31:37 PM PDT by AlexisHeavyMetal1981 (x)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

This way, the politicians can say they are not going to take away gu ns.

They’re going to have your doctor state the claim and law ‘enforce ment’ confiscate.

This is triangulation.

“I’m not gonna ki l l ya. Vinnie, kil l him.”

68 posted on 04/10/2013 3:43:49 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexisHeavyMetal1981

Yes, we ceased to be revolutionaries when the Brits accepted defeat and we formed our own government. Since then we have simply been patriots who support the rule of law of our own system of governance.

69 posted on 04/10/2013 3:52:56 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Email or call Toomey NOW. I just emailed him.

My gut feeling is he is dead meat in PA. It just proves what happens when you start hanging out with Chuck Schumer. Toomey would be much better off if he didn't talk to anyone and just voted against every bill in the Senate. We don't need any new laws. We don't need any more spending. We don't need any more taxes. We don't need any more regulations.

Maybe I am a simple man, but wouldn't it be great if Republicans just shut up and they only vote for bills that spend, regular and control less?

70 posted on 04/10/2013 5:21:21 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA (Molon Labe - Shall not be questioned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction

Oh yeah! And scary looking as well!

71 posted on 04/10/2013 5:38:17 PM PDT by cyn (Benghazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan

That would be scary.

Most Americans haven’t lived under tyranny and don’t appreciate the freedoms that we all take for granted. They eagerly give away our freedoms for false security.

72 posted on 04/10/2013 5:56:54 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction

Haha, yeah — black, and scary!

73 posted on 04/10/2013 6:04:52 PM PDT by cyn (Benghazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’ve contacted my Senators (Manchin and Rockefeller — ugh!!) to voice my opposition.

74 posted on 04/11/2013 5:18:53 AM PDT by white trash redneck (Just one of B. Hussein Obama's "typical white people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

Someone needs to ask this asshat Toomey that question.

75 posted on 04/11/2013 6:02:32 AM PDT by paul544
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson