Skip to comments.
Yes, Ted Cruz Can be President
Cato Institute ^
| August 26, 2013
| Ilya Shapiro
Posted on 08/26/2013 1:51:55 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-327 next last
|
|
|
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton |
|
|
|
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldnt make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan |
|
|
|
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792 |
|
|
|
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams |
|
|
|
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To: SoConPubbie; VinL; ex-snook; sport; INVAR; ejonesie22; PieterCasparzen; Colonel_Flagg; Washi; ...
2
posted on
08/26/2013 1:52:29 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
3
posted on
08/26/2013 1:56:23 PM PDT
by
Godebert
To: SoConPubbie
In before the birthers.
/johnny
To: JRandomFreeper
5
posted on
08/26/2013 1:57:03 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
To: JRandomFreeper
just 3 more years of them ...good lord what a nightmare
6
posted on
08/26/2013 1:57:52 PM PDT
by
thestob
(Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan are determined to destroy our country)
To: thestob
There aren't many here, but they are annoying with their conspiracies.
In the long run, they are meaningless.
/johnny
To: SoConPubbie
Yes, Ted Cruz Can SHOULD be President!
8
posted on
08/26/2013 2:01:56 PM PDT
by
Baynative
(Lord, keep your arm around my shoulder and your hand over my mouth.)
To: JRandomFreeper
"In the long run, they are meaningless."Then so is the rule of law.
9
posted on
08/26/2013 2:02:05 PM PDT
by
Godebert
To: SoConPubbie
Sober recitation of facts won’t satisfy the haters.
10
posted on
08/26/2013 2:02:29 PM PDT
by
iowamark
To: Godebert
You are a one trick pony.
/johnny
To: SoConPubbie
We’ve got a Kenyan for President so why not a Canadian, eh?
12
posted on
08/26/2013 2:04:20 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(A gun is like a parachute. If you need one, and don't have one, you'll never need one again.)
To: Godebert
Fortuntely (in the case of Cruz) and unfortunately (in the case of Obama), you are incorrect on the law.
13
posted on
08/26/2013 2:05:04 PM PDT
by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: SoConPubbie
Where does Cruz stand on intervention in Syria?
To: SoConPubbie
Obama has lowered the standards of this country so far that even Idi Amin could be President.
To: SoConPubbie
Sorry (sincerely sorry) but the good Senator “Ted” Cruz’s daddy was not an American citizen when “Ted” was born.
To: JRandomFreeper
"You are a one trick pony."The Constitution of the United States of America is not a "trick".
17
posted on
08/26/2013 2:09:23 PM PDT
by
Godebert
To: Uncle Chip
Obama has lowered the standards of this country so far that even Idi Amin could be President.Hell's bells, he'd probably be an improvement.
18
posted on
08/26/2013 2:09:34 PM PDT
by
Marathoner
(Sarah Palin is our Esther, for such a time as this)
To: Godebert; JRandomFreeper
Then so is the rule of law.
Please point out the relevant part of the US Constitution that supports your opinion of the meaning of "Natural Born" citizenship requirements.
Lacking that, please point out the relevant law pass by the US Congress and signed by a US President that supports your opinion of the meaning of "Natural Born" citizenship requirements.
Lacking that, please point out the relevant US Supreme Court ruling that supports your opinion of the meaning of "Natural Born" citizenship requirements.
If you can't provide any of the above, you don't have a leg to stand on, constitutionally speaking.
You see, the founders of this country (those guys who wrote the US Constitution) were really smart guys and with the exception of Slavery (for very real and well-stated reasons) covered everything that they could think of at the time in detail. I sincerely doubt that if they thought as you do on this subject, they would have overlooked this issue and not have left clear requirements/or a definition in the Constitution.
Does not seem very likely.
19
posted on
08/26/2013 2:10:39 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: faithhopecharity
Sorry (sincerely sorry) but the good Senator Ted Cruzs daddy was not an American citizen when Ted was born.
Please point out the relevant part of the US Constitution that supports your opinion of the meaning of "Natural Born" citizenship requirements.
Lacking that, please point out the relevant law pass by the US Congress and signed by a US President that supports your opinion of the meaning of "Natural Born" citizenship requirements.
Lacking that, please point out the relevant US Supreme Court ruling that supports your opinion of the meaning of "Natural Born" citizenship requirements.
If you can't provide any of the above, you don't have a leg to stand on, constitutionally speaking.
You see, the founders of this country (those guys who wrote the US Constitution) were really smart guys and with the exception of Slavery (for very real and well-stated reasons) covered everything that they could think of at the time in detail. I sincerely doubt that if they thought as you do on this subject, they would have overlooked this issue and not have left clear requirements/or a definition in the Constitution.
Does not seem very likely.
20
posted on
08/26/2013 2:11:41 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-327 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson