Posted on 11/04/2013 1:00:33 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
“The U.S. Senate is set to vote on the bill tonight. Reports say the bill is not expected to be brought up for a vote in the U.S. House.”
I thought queers, fags, homos, dykes and all other manner of freaks were already “protected”. Dare I ask what else there is?
I wish bonehead would pull a reed on this kind of krap.
I hope a halfway house of transgenders moves right next door to the good Senator.
I wish the same sort of thing would happen with illegals moving next door to Congressmen supporting amnesty.
However, this won’t happen as these “special people” live in gated communities well-protected and shielded from the social ills they encourage with their legislation.
I have always wanted to know why we can’t dicriminate against behavior, esp. degenerate, self-destructive behavior?
“He can see the Senate majority going up in smoke in November 2014, so he wants to get while the getting is good for his favorite groups.”
The really good news here is that he’s retiring and giving the GOP a seat ( that is if the GOPe doesn’t trash the likely Republican candidate). As for his legislation, my guess is that it’s dead in the House.
“Eastern Iowa is a strange place, full of former industrial small cities/towns.”
Eastern Iowa is more like Illinois. Just look at the Quad Cities Area.
You realize that heterosexual is a sexual orientation.
As is Pedophilia
NO! I realize that Heterosexual is a NORMAL sexual orientation and pedophilia is a ABNORMAL mental condition.
You can have YOUR normals and I will keep mine thank you very much. A person would not be reaching to far that by your comment you thought pedophilia should be protected.
Pedophilia is a sexual orientation.
There is no normal in the liberal world.
Never forget that the mechanical genius/progenator Mormon, Jonathan Browning, lived in extreme Western Ill.
“Happiness” is an orthogonal development wrt sexual “orientation”.
In other words - do not expect to freely practice your religion if it objects to homosexual behavior.
So if I get off on wearing women’s clothes, I can wear them to work and they can’t stop me? Does this apply for wearing leather and bondage gear as well? What if I’m a nudist and exhibitionist? If it’s illegal to discriminate against how I’m sexually oriented, then I should be able to go nude or wear bondage gear at work as well as cross-dress. Different strokes for different folks.
Didn’t the Civil Rights Act provide protection for all persons regardless of ......
See, balanced budgets are not hard.
:-)
100% agree. Heterosexuality, and to be more specific, heterosexuality for non-relatives of not totally dissimilar age is the only normal I recognize.
You speak the truth.
“How does Iowa send people like this to Washington? “
A small black buggie.
It is a very hard thing to watch all of this destruction of our great Republic.
Thanks Tailgunner Joe.
Obama Turns Blogger To Make Pitch for Gay Rights Bill
Yahoo News | November 4, 2013 | Joel Roberts, Yahoo! News
Posted on 11/04/2013 5:25:07 PM PST by lbryce
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3087533/posts
“They do love Muslims because Muslims are violent towards Jews and Christians.”
Yea but what they gonna do when the muzzies get violent towards the Homos and cross dressers?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.