Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baker says he’d rather go to jail after judge orders him to bake cakes for gay ‘weddings’
Life Site News ^ | December 11, 2013 | KIRSTEN ANDERSEN

Posted on 12/11/2013 3:10:11 PM PST by NYer

DENVER, December 11, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A Denver cake baker who was ordered by a judge last week to service same-sex “weddings” or face punishing fines has told Fox News that he would rather shut down his business and serve jail time than violate his beliefs and play a role in facilitating gay nuptials.

In an interview with Fox’s Elisabeth Hasselbeck, cake maker Jack Phillips said, “You know, [I’ll serve jail time if] that’s what it takes.  It’s not like I have chosen this team or that team. This is who I am, it’s what I believe.”

“Does becoming a business owner mean you have to check your convictions at the door?” Hasselbeck asked. “Why is it important for you to have a business and not have to abandon personal religious beliefs just to make a buck?”

“I don't plan on giving up my religious beliefs ... I don't feel that I should participate in their wedding, and when I do a cake, I feel like I'm participating in the ceremony or the event or the celebration that the cake is for,” Phillips said. “My priorities would be towards my faith rather than towards my safety or security.”

Phillips, who owns Masterpiece Cakeshop in the Denver suburb of Lakewood, has been under fire since July 2012, when David Mullins and Charlie Craig filed a discrimination complaint after Phillips refused to sell them a wedding cake. 

While Colorado’s constitution states, “Only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as marriage in this state,” Mullins and Craig had nonetheless planned to “marry” in Massachusetts, where a court order made same-sex “marriage” legal in 2004.  Afterward, they planned to hold a reception in Colorado.  When they visited Phillips’ cake shop to ask him to provide a wedding cake for the event, he declined, explaining that his religious beliefs prevented him from participating in same-sex “weddings.”  Phillips said he would be happy to sell them brownies or other treats to serve at the reception, just not a wedding cake.

The two men reacted with angry disbelief.  “It was the most awkward, surreal, very brief encounter," Mullins told Denver Westword at the time. “We got up to leave, and to be totally honest, I said, ‘F--- you and your homophobic cake shop.’ And I may or may not have flipped him off.”

After the two men departed Phillips’s business, they filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission with the help of the ACLU, arguing that Phillips violated the state’s anti-discrimination laws, which were expanded in 2008 to include sexual preference and gender identity.

Phillips and his lawyers have argued that the religious nature of his objection to gay “marriage” warrants an exception to the anti-discrimination law, which also names religion among its protected classes.  

But on December 7, Judge Robert Spencer ruled in the gay couple’s favor, equating Phillips’s deeply held religious beliefs against gay “marriage” with racial bias.  To allow Phillips to refuse to serve gay “weddings,” the judge argued, “would allow a business that served all races to nonetheless refuse to serve an interracial couple because of the business owner's bias against interracial marriage.”

Wrote Spencer, “it may seem reasonable that a private business should be able to refuse service to anyone it chooses. This view, however, fails to take into account the cost to society and the hurt caused to persons who are denied service simply because of who they are.”

The judge also rejected Phillips’s argument that he was simply obeying the state constitution by refusing to recognize a same-sex relationship as “marriage.”

“Although [Phillips and his lawyers] are correct that Colorado does not recognize same-sex marriage,” wrote Spencer, “that fact does not excuse discrimination based upon sexual orientation.”

Phillips’s attorney, Nicolle Martin, told the Associated Press that Spencer’s decision was “reprehensible” and “antithetical to everything America stands for.”

“[Jack Phillips] can't violate his conscience in order to collect a paycheck,” Martin said. “If Jack can't make wedding cakes, he can't continue to support his family. And in order to make wedding cakes, Jack must violate his belief system.”

Martin says her client has not ruled out an appeal.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: bakery; glbt; homosexualagenda; wedding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-150 next last
To: NYer

Another political hack in a black muumuu setting forth an edict. Why do we ascribe any amount of societal honor to these political whores?


61 posted on 12/11/2013 3:59:48 PM PST by RKBA Democrat ( There is no worst president but owebama, and valerie jarrett is his prophet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Easy to identify and trace, he’d end up in jail on assault charges.

There’s a better idea: simply say that for every gay wedding cake he’s compelled to bake he’ll donate the profits to one of the number of Christian organizations that provide services to flip gays straight.

Problem will quickly solve itself.


62 posted on 12/11/2013 4:01:43 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

And some justice will use sophistry to deem it constitutional.


63 posted on 12/11/2013 4:01:50 PM PST by RKBA Democrat ( There is no worst president but owebama, and valerie jarrett is his prophet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here
This is more about property rights than religious freedom...

It's also about the rights of entering into (or otherwise) a legal contract. The libs have basically asserted that a businessperson must enter into a contractual agreement against one party's wishes. In contract law, that's illegal, and makes said coerced contract worthless and unenforcable.
64 posted on 12/11/2013 4:02:08 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Are the courts going to throw Muslim taxi drivers in jail for refusing people who have service dogs?
This type of refusal of service should apply to them also.


65 posted on 12/11/2013 4:02:48 PM PST by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

Did it to a photographer too. I think they purposely search out businesses to harass.


66 posted on 12/11/2013 4:04:15 PM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

Most likely add alum.


67 posted on 12/11/2013 4:04:49 PM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Charge them extra in advance, if they serve it they are nuts


68 posted on 12/11/2013 4:06:38 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

Interesting about that. I wonder if his lawyer brought that up during trial.


69 posted on 12/11/2013 4:09:02 PM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

I could have been a random coincidence, however based on the past tactics of the militant homosexuals, I’d say you are correct.


70 posted on 12/11/2013 4:09:05 PM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
..." fails to take into account the cost to society and the hurt caused to persons who are denied service simply because of who they are.

------------------------------------>

What about "the hurt caused to persons" - like the baker - who are forced by the government to abandon their personal views "because of who they are".

71 posted on 12/11/2013 4:10:28 PM PST by hummingbird (Don't be afraid of the big words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The baker could stop doing wedding cakes or maybe just stop doing any “Writing” on baked goods.


72 posted on 12/11/2013 4:13:08 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

You are correct. Could have packed the cake with fudge.


73 posted on 12/11/2013 4:17:05 PM PST by bobo1 (progressives=socialism/commies/fascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NYer

He should have raised his price to something that the homos could not afford


74 posted on 12/11/2013 4:17:22 PM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
This is my problem with fags also...don’t make me a participant in your perversion.

The homos are always telling us, "if you don't like 'gay marriage,' then don't have one." Well, this man doesn't like counterfeit marriage but is being forced to have (participate in) one. What liars the homosexual Left are.

75 posted on 12/11/2013 4:18:40 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
So there are some men left.

So.... Real men do bake cakes. Yes, apparently they do. Hope this goes to the SCOTUS.
76 posted on 12/11/2013 4:23:36 PM PST by keat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Just make a shitty cake for them.


77 posted on 12/11/2013 4:24:05 PM PST by The Iceman Cometh (Proud Teabagging Barbarian Terrorist Hobbit Crazy Cracker Son-of-a-Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NYer
"This view, however, fails to take into account the cost to society and the hurt caused to persons who are denied service simply because of who they are.”

Even with racial prejudice and discrimination -- the market will be the most moral deciding factor of the "hurt caused." Let my local grocery store discriminate against black folks, and watch me go shop somewhere else, and that grocery store be hounded out of business by moral people. That's the approach my grandfather took when racial discrimination in business was legal, back in the 1920s and 1930s. It worked. Such discrimination is held in contempt by right people.

This baker is behaving in a perfectly moral way -- peacefully, civilly discriminating against behavior that he thinks is wrong. The gay folks could go find another bakery.

You pays your money and you takes your chances; the judge pointedly ignores the truth that discriminating against open homosexuality is very different from discriminating purely by race. In any case, we risk bad moral behavior on the part of inevitable assclowns as the price of freedom, and hope that good overcomes bad. In a Christian society, that's what happens. America should be celebrating and embracing its Christian heritage. Loving your neighbor as you love yourself, treating others as you would yourself be treated -- that's a basic Christian tenet and why we live in a slavery-free Western Civilization.

78 posted on 12/11/2013 4:24:31 PM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

> While Colorado’s constitution states, “Only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as marriage in this state,” Mullins and Craig had nonetheless planned to “marry” in Massachusetts... they planned to hold a reception in Colorado. When they visited Phillips’ cake shop to ask him to provide a wedding cake for the event, he declined, explaining that his religious beliefs prevented him from participating in same-sex “weddings.” Phillips said he would be happy to sell them brownies or other treats to serve at the reception, just not a wedding cake.

Thanks NYer.


79 posted on 12/11/2013 4:27:25 PM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
Why do we ascribe any amount of societal honor to these political whores?

Because they've convinced us that it's illegal to assault (tar and feather) them.

80 posted on 12/11/2013 4:27:55 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson