Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/04/2014 5:25:29 PM PDT by Moseley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Moseley

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/the-lefts-anti-science/#IrlhJoKeQW8qsjrv.99

Modern scientists are “Imagineers.” Such tripe should be condemned because it encourages the modern attitude that speculation equals science. A culture of unbridled speculation permeates every aspect of today’s scientific world. If you read the most sophisticated scientific papers and analyses, you would see guesswork transformed into fact there in black and white. That is science fiction, not science. Flights of imagination have become popular under “thought experiments,” a contradiction in terms.

Real science is governed by the Scientific Method. Unless a hypothesis can be proven true or false by repeatable and repeated experiments it isn’t science. Results must be verified by independent teams of unbiased researchers, by experiments conducted under varying conditions and in different locations. Anything less doesn’t qualify as science. (Now, to be fair, probably 99 percent of the work of science is the thankless drudgery of collecting raw data out in the field. But those heroes who do the leg work are not drawing conclusions.)

A perfect example is Galileo. Aristotle and other Greek philosophers determined – by pure imagination or thought experiments – that if you drop a large and small cannonball, the larger one will fall faster. But nobody tried it until Galilei Galileo dropped cannonballs off the leaning tower of Pisa. The great Aristotle was wrong. Aristotle was brilliant, but totally wrong. Aristotle was highly educated, but wrong. And the physics Galileo discovered helped transform our understanding of nature. We would not have the orbital mechanics needed to land a man on the moon if Galileo hadn’t tested Aristotle’s conclusions. It doesn’t matter if someone is wise or educated; his opinion is meaningless without putting it to the test.

Another example is cold fusion. In 1989, chemists Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann made headlines by announcing that they had achieved fusion at room temperature – “cold” fusion. That would mean the generation of limitless, clean energy from water under relatively simple conditions. But when other researchers tried to repeat the experiments, no one could reproduce their positive results.

That is real science. Other teams have to be able to reproduce the same results. You can’t get from here all the way to science without repeating the experiment many times. Cold fusion was disproven at the stage of other teams trying to reproduce the results.

But that’s the problem: No one can ever perform even a single experiment to prove man-made global warming or evolution (meaning life springing from non-life) true or false. For certain, no experiment could be repeated.


2 posted on 04/04/2014 5:27:15 PM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

The attempt to conflate the two is not suprising but of course is specious.

TTOE is a full Scientific Theory that meets all the criteria thereof.

AGW is at best a hypothesis that meets exactly none.


3 posted on 04/04/2014 5:32:42 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Fight Tapinophobia in all its forms! Do not submit to arduus privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley
Real science should be worried about this. When the public realizes they've been lied to by the AGW jihadis, it will immeasurably damage the credibility of science.

But AGW is nothing new, it's just the biggest. We had DDT, nuclear energy, overpopulation, two minutes to midnight for decades, silicon breast implants, saccharine, and I'm sure I'm forgetting many. Oh, yes, we now have the fracking scare. It all has made me very suspicious whenever liberals base a policy on alleged science.

9 posted on 04/04/2014 5:55:55 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

There is no anthropomorphic global warming. It’s a hoax.

Wish the article didn’t muddy the fact of evolution along with it.

(My church, the RC Church has no problem with God working through evolution)


10 posted on 04/04/2014 5:58:19 PM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

There is no anthropomorphic global warming. It’s a hoax.

Wish the article didn’t muddy the fact of evolution along with it.

(My church, the RC Church has no problem with God working through evolution)


12 posted on 04/04/2014 5:58:40 PM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

bm


27 posted on 04/04/2014 6:20:39 PM PDT by Vision (Living in beauty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

*** When the fraud of man-made global warming finally dies, folks will start thinking: What else were we lied to about?***

No they won’t because by then the scientists will have found some other thing to keep the public frightened.

The purpose of a politician is to keep the public frightened of an imaginary booger man that only the politician can protect you from.


29 posted on 04/04/2014 6:23:10 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

... and still, after all these many years, evolution is still just a theory.


60 posted on 04/05/2014 8:05:12 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

global warming is a hoax democrats created to grow socialism


66 posted on 04/05/2014 9:22:24 PM PDT by Democrat_media (Obama ordered IRS to rig 2012 election and must resign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley
Oh goody !

Another Flat Earth thread !


(and we wonder why . . . )

83 posted on 04/07/2014 2:33:02 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

So Science is now dead because evolution can’t be proven through the scientific method, but it will spring back to like if they toss creationism into the mix?


103 posted on 04/10/2014 5:44:17 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Bookmark


134 posted on 04/14/2014 6:29:17 PM PDT by Pajamajan (Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley
One bit of evidence of the validity of a science is its ability to make reasonable accurate predictions as to future events. For example a sophisticated physicist can predict very accurately the position of the moon three hundred years hence; Take Hydrogen gas and oxygen gas and add a spark and one predicts water; etc. etc..

Therefore, as a "science" an evolutionist should be able to predict what a pigeon will look like in 11,000,000 years.

165 posted on 04/17/2014 2:25:09 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson