Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wimping Out on Repeal
Creators Syndicate ^ | April 30, 2014 | Betsy McCaughey

Posted on 04/29/2014 11:44:26 AM PDT by jazusamo

Top Republican Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Washington, is walking back comments attributed to her that Obamacare can't be repealed. But she's not the only one suggesting that the goal should be making changes within the framework of the health law. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, says the goal is to get the law "fixed." Apparently, a lot of Republican lawmakers still haven't read the law. If they had, they'd know the framework is corrupt.

Even presidential hopeful Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, speculated on Friday that repeal is unlikely, because it will be "difficult to turn the clock back."

Nonsense. Even by the most inflated Obama administration claims, some 8 million people have signed up for exchange plans out of a nation of 318 million. Obamacare is able to be repealed and should be replaced with a plan to cover the uninsured and reduce costs.

Obamacare's authors paid lip service to these goals but had an ulterior motive: forging a permanent Democratic majority. The law creates a huge infrastructure for enrolling millions of people not just in health care but also food stamps, housing assistance and other welfare programs — and registering them to vote.

Here are the pillars of this corrupt scheme. None of the minor fixes Republicans are discussing come even close to sweeping away this corruption.

—Navigators and assisters (Section 1311): Instead of government employees promoting Obamacare and enrolling the uninsured, the law reserves these jobs for community activists, unions, community health centers and other not-for-profits. Players include the NAACP, Planned Parenthood and the Service Employees International Union. Hiring these groups is a way to fund the shadow army of the Democratic Party in between elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at creators.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: abortion; corruption; deathpanels; kentucky; obamacare; randpaultruthfile; repeal; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2014 11:44:26 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, says the goal is to get the law “fixed.”
___________________________________

yeah Mafia fixed would be good...


2 posted on 04/29/2014 11:53:58 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Well we kind of knew didn’t we?


3 posted on 04/29/2014 11:57:57 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

End it, don’t mend it.


4 posted on 04/29/2014 11:58:02 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; All

“Republican Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Washington, is walking back comments attributed to her that Obamacare can’t be repealed.”

So in 1519 when Spanish Conquistador Hernando Cortez landed in Mexico on the shores of the Yucatan he made a complete and total commitment.

Cortez got the “buy in” from the rest of his men and took away the option of failure.

It was either conquer and be hero’s and enjoy the spoils of victory…or DIE!

When Cortez and his men arrived on the shores of the Yucatan he rallied the men for one final pep talk before leading his men into battle, and uttered these three words that changed the course of history — “Burn the Ships!”

Who on the right is willing to burn the ships and risk winning big and going down as hero’s?

We know there are lots and lots of politicians that will play safe - No risk, no reward, small ball.

But who will buy into the Cortez model?


5 posted on 04/29/2014 12:04:08 PM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
...the goal should be making changes within the framework of the health law.

It seems these Republicans are just more RAT commies.

6 posted on 04/29/2014 12:08:29 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Shot Heard Around The World’ is coming again and I doubt it will be pretty when it does.


7 posted on 04/29/2014 12:08:45 PM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Certain portions of it will likely never be repealed.

The “Junior can stay on dad’s plan till age 26” provision won’t ever be repealed.

The “they have to take you and your pre-existing condition” clause seems pretty repeal-proof.

In states that were stupid enough to expand Medicaid there are tens of millions of new recipients who will be hard to discharge.

Other than that though, plenty of room to work.


8 posted on 04/29/2014 12:09:23 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug; DaveA37

Yep, and anything short of repeal will be a disaster, IMO.


9 posted on 04/29/2014 12:12:26 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I doubt much of anything will be repealed until a particular item has cost millions to billions and it’s done as a last resort. 0care will be a money pit and become nothing but socialized medicine.


10 posted on 04/29/2014 12:18:58 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!

11 posted on 04/29/2014 12:20:46 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Ultimately you are correct. It is headed for financial collapse, due to all of the phony bookkeeping and faked-out numbers used to keep its CBO score down while it was being passed.


12 posted on 04/29/2014 12:27:43 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
When the real numbers come in...it will choke itself...just too many are being subsidized...Medicaid on steroids....

The end game will be another deduction out of your paycheck.

13 posted on 04/29/2014 12:34:09 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Let me get this straight. Going into midterms against a president with approval ratings around 40%, the GOP cannot find the courage to promise repeal of the most hated, destructive, job-killing, freedom usurping law since prohibition.

It is beyond silly to think the Republican Party will even consider the reforms necessary to save our republic.

Article V is our only hope.

14 posted on 04/29/2014 12:35:14 PM PDT by Jacquerie (By their oaths, it is the duty of state legislators to invoke Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
2014 may not be ripe to push repeal but by 2016 everybody will be screaming for it.

Certainly shouldn't call it here to stay now.

15 posted on 04/29/2014 12:39:06 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Well said and that’s where the Republican Party is at.


16 posted on 04/29/2014 12:40:57 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

BTTT!


17 posted on 04/29/2014 12:49:29 PM PDT by neverdem (Register pressure cookers! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72

That is why I am really hoping that Vermont will go ahead and pull the trigger on state-level single payer.

They will be broke in two years, and deter any skulls o’ mush out there from considering that option.


18 posted on 04/29/2014 1:29:28 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Rand Paul On Shutdown: "Even Though It Appeared I Was Participating In It, It Was A Dumb Idea"
I said throughout the whole battle that shutting down the government was a dumb idea. Even though it did appear as if I was participating in it, I said it was a dumb idea. And the reason I voted for it, though, is that it's a conundrum. Here's the conundrum. We have a $17 trillion debt and people at home tell me you can't give the president a blank check. We just can't keep raising the debt ceiling without conditions. So unconditionally raising the debt ceiling, nobody at home wants me to vote for that and I can't vote for that. But the conundrum is if I don't we do approach these deadlines. So there is an impasse. In 2011, though, we had this impasse and the president did negotiate. We got the sequester. If we were to extend the sequester from discretionary spending to all the entitlements we would actually fix our problem within a few years.
[Posted on 11/19/2013 12:16:51 PM by Third Person]

19 posted on 04/29/2014 1:35:23 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AU72
Certainly shouldn't call it here to stay now.

The goal of Obama et al. is to ensure that by the time the system collapses, which it will, there won't be an old system to go back to and the only alternative will be single-payer. Giving Obama et al. another two years to destroy the existing health-care system doesn't seem like a good idea to me.

20 posted on 04/29/2014 4:06:59 PM PDT by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson