Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems want to mine for 'hate speech': Sen. Markey's legislation to monitor media and internet
One News Now ^ | 05/02/2014 | Chad Groening

Posted on 05/29/2014 7:02:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

A pro-family organization is warning that "hate crime"-related legislation introduced on Capitol Hill could potentially squash free speech and create a "thought-controlled society."

In mid-April, Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Massachusetts) introduced a bill authorizing the government to monitor and analyze speech online, on television, and over the radio, with the aim of classifying it as hate speech under the government's own vague guidelines and then possibly charging the "offenders" with a hate crime.

The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 (S. 2219) would create a comprehensive report of Internet and other telecommunications speech regarding gender, race, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation. It would also create recommendations to address such crimes.

If S. 2219 becomes law, it would be "a really big step toward a police state," says Patrick Vaughan, general counsel for the American Family Association.

"What they propose to do is capture and monitor everything that's said on broadcast or everything that's said on the Internet; they're going to grab it all," the attorney describes. "Then they're going to analyze it to see if there might be something going on that would lead to a crime in the future."

(Excerpt) Read more at onenewsnow.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democrats; edmarkey; hatespeech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: SeekAndFind
I'll save them the trouble:

I hate the government.

21 posted on 05/29/2014 7:43:03 AM PDT by clintonh8r (I wish no harm on Gen. Shinseki, but perhaps he should consider seppuku.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Is it ever a hate crime to want to take more money from your fellow citizens via tax increases? Or to steal their real property through more environmental regulations? Or to destroy their religious beliefs through employer mandates? Or is it only the beliefs of conservatives that constitute "hate"?

"Democrat" is just another word for fascist.

22 posted on 05/29/2014 7:52:57 AM PDT by Defiant (Let the Tea Party win, and we will declare peace on the American people and go home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How can they manage the backlash, when emails are dropped for snail mail?
How can they manage the backlash when folks write on postcards, again?
How can they manage, with the sale of so many writing instruments, both for use and collecting, whether that be in hand or mechanical?
How can they manage, when a regular pen and ink journal cannot be electronically mined, nor could they decipher the language, syntax, slang, and symmetry used by an individual for their own reference?


23 posted on 05/29/2014 8:04:20 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We don’t need a second “Sedition Act”. John Adams, another Bay-Stater, tried it and it did not work out well.


24 posted on 05/29/2014 8:14:55 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This should be easy.

Just go to any site where liberals congregate.

There they will find unlimited hate speech towards, Christians, Jews and white people.

Go to any site frequented by blacks. There you will find hatefilled speech and even OPEN THREATS towards white people.

(but they are not talking about THAT kind of hatespeech, are they? no no no)


25 posted on 05/29/2014 8:24:58 AM PDT by envisio (Its on like Donkey Kong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

NSA gets another department?.


26 posted on 05/29/2014 8:30:11 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

First they made ham sandwiches, bananas and watermelons hate speech. Then they said sports teams names were racist. Now anything and everything that a White Christian male says or does, or doesn’t say or doesn’t do, is classified as hate speech.

So then this is just a logical development.


27 posted on 05/29/2014 8:32:25 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

They think they’ll have a Holder to back them all the time. heehee


28 posted on 05/29/2014 8:41:40 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
...could potentially QUASH free speech. Quash, not squash.
29 posted on 05/29/2014 8:42:41 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Claire Wolfe’s ‘Awkward Phase’ is officially over. It’s really time to start.


30 posted on 05/29/2014 8:56:18 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

> When the left proposes laws that are ripe for abuse (like this one), the left is tacitly using the ethics of the right against them.

In other words taking advantage of our good nature and sense of fairness while being a snake in the grass about it. Yep. I get that.


31 posted on 05/29/2014 8:58:01 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

Sorry - I lapsed into a momentary bout of diplomacy! LOL


32 posted on 05/29/2014 8:59:39 AM PDT by MortMan (Avoid temporary variables and strange women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

33 posted on 05/29/2014 9:09:50 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne ("How long, O Lord, holy and true?" - Rev. 6:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 (S. 2219) would create a comprehensive report of Internet and other telecommunications speech regarding gender, race, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation.

If we comment on Obama's ambiguous and possibly undefined gender, is that a hate crime? What about that communist's ambiguous race, which is also a mix of the two most obvious guesses? The same for his religion, which he claims is Christian although for some reason few people believe his claim. As for sexual orientation, is there anyone alive who believes Obama is straight, and will it become a hate crime to wonder whether Obama even has an orientation?

34 posted on 05/29/2014 10:36:39 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Some locales are already monitoring what you say online:

http://www.prairiestatereport.us/2014/05/29/woman-mailed-citation-from-chicago-area-park-district-after-social-media-post/


35 posted on 05/29/2014 10:39:35 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Don’t we all?...lol


36 posted on 05/29/2014 10:42:46 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

That is disappointing.


37 posted on 05/29/2014 10:43:56 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

> Bill was sponsored in Congress by Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, representing New York’s 8th congressional district in Brooklyn and Queens.

Ahh one if the Muzzies and the white guilt ridden RINOs are probably siding with him for “solidarity” (votes). Hakeem is just setting the net for a spike to protect the Muzzie religion of Satanism later when they are lopping off body parts ad inifintum and don’t want anyone “blaspheming” their god and religion of pieces.


38 posted on 05/29/2014 10:47:12 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

> The fact that they’re even trying this indicates that they are worried that they are losing the debate online, and thus need to terminate discussion.

BAM! Nail on the head...


39 posted on 05/29/2014 10:48:41 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: envisio

“Go to any site frequented by blacks. There you will find hatefilled speech and even OPEN THREATS towards white people.”

If they pass this law, fine. The ACLJ can go after Malik “kill cracker babies” Shabazz. When the racist POS Eric Holder throws out the case again, the actual news outlets can show the people he is nothing but a modern negro nazi.

Foxnews was the ONLY one to carry the ‘08 NBP voter intimidation case.


40 posted on 05/29/2014 2:56:32 PM PDT by MikeSteelBe (Austrian Hitler was, as the Halfrican Hitler does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson